Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Nikon L820

On this page, we are matching up the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Nikon L820, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and the L820 (16MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") and L820 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm HS50 EXR was manufactured around the same time to the L820 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm HS50 EXR scores vs the L820 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR & Nikon Coolpix L820. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery & Nikon L820 Gallery.

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR has got outer measurements of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs) and the Nikon L820 has sizing of 111mm x 76mm x 85mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 3.3") with a weight of 470 grams (1.04 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Nikon L820 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR compared to the L820.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and L820 is 54 and 72 respectively.

Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and L820.

To sum up, both cameras have the same MP but different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR contains the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult.