Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31


93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 124g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012

Fujifilm FinePix JX370 vs. Fujifilm FinePix T400: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right compact camera can be daunting, especially when two models come from the same trusted brand and share many features yet deliver distinct experiences. In this in-depth comparison, we place the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 head-to-head with the Fujifilm FinePix T400. Both are small sensor compacts aimed at casual shooters and enthusiasts who want simple usability without sacrificing versatility.
Drawing on years of hands-on testing and technical analysis, we’ll uncover which camera fits your creative needs across genres like portraiture, landscape, sports, and beyond. We’ll break down real-world performance, technical aspects, ergonomics, and value so you can make an informed choice. Let’s get started!
Unpacking the Essentials: Key Specs at a Glance
Before diving deep, here’s a concise side-by-side summary of the main specifications to set the stage:
Feature | Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | Fujifilm FinePix T400 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD, 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | CCD, 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
Resolution | 14 MP | 16 MP |
Lens | 28-140mm equiv. (5x zoom), f/2.6-6.2 | 28-280mm equiv. (10x zoom), f/3.4-5.6 |
Image Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift (IBIS) |
ISO Range | 100-1600 (3200 boost) | 100-1600 (3200 boost) |
Autofocus System | Contrast-detection, center AF | Contrast-detection, center AF + Face detection |
Continuous Shooting | 1.0 fps | 1.0 fps |
Video | 720p at 30 fps, MJPEG format | 720p at 30 fps, MJPEG & H.264 formats |
Screen | 2.7” Fixed TFT LCD, 230k dots | 2.7” Fixed TFT LCD, 230k dots |
Weight | 124 g | 159 g |
Dimensions (WxHxD in mm) | 95 x 57 x 24 | 104 x 59 x 29 |
Battery Life | Approx. 190 shots | Approx. 180 shots |
Storage | SD / SDHC | SD / SDHC / SDXC |
Price (at launch) | $159 | $149.95 |
We immediately see the T400 offers a significant telephoto advantage in zoom and includes sensor-shift image stabilization - two potentially decisive features depending on your photography style.
Design, Build Quality, and Ergonomics: Handling & Controls Compared
Both cameras epitomize Fujifilm’s compact and straightforward design ethos geared toward casual users. However, subtle differences influence handling and usability.
- Fujifilm JX370 is smaller and lighter, weighing just 124 grams and measuring 95x57x24mm. Its slim profile makes it pocket-friendly for travel and street photography.
- Fujifilm T400 is slightly larger and heavier at 159 grams and 104x59x29mm, reflecting its extended zoom and added stabilization hardware.
Both feature fixed TFT LCDs of identical size and resolution without touch functionality, limiting interaction modes. The JX370 lacks any built-in image stabilization, which might impact handheld shots.
Looking at the top view comparison, both cameras offer simple control layouts without dedicated dials for aperture or shutter priority modes, emphasizing an automatic shooting experience suitable for beginners.
Ergonomics favor the JX370’s compact footprint for portability and discrete shooting situations like urban street photography. The T400’s grip is marginally larger, which may appeal if you prefer a slightly bulkier feel for telephoto framing and stability.
Note: Neither camera offers a viewfinder, electronic or optical, so reliance on the LCD screen is mandatory for composing shots outdoors.
Sensor and Image Quality: What to Expect from the Small CCD Sensors
Both models rely on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, with minor differences in megapixel count (14MP for JX370 and 16MP for T400). Although the resolution edge favors the T400, practical image quality will depend on more than pixel count alone.
- The CCD sensor excels at delivering punchy colors and relatively low noise at base ISO.
- The limited sensor size dictates compromises in dynamic range and high ISO performance compared to larger sensors.
ISO Sensitivity: Both cameras have a native max ISO of 1600 with extended boosts to 3200, but CCD sensors typically struggle with noise beyond ISO 800 under low light.
Image Stabilization: The T400 includes sensor-shift image stabilization, a rare feature in this class. This helps in low-light scenarios and when shooting at telephoto focal lengths, compensating for minor hand shacks and enhancing sharpness.
Lens Impact: The JX370’s f/2.6 maximum aperture at wide end is faster than the T400’s f/3.4, counterbalancing somewhat the lack of IS in low light.
Real-world results: Our tests show both cameras produce decent JPEGs for web sharing and casual prints up to 8x10”. However, images taken beyond ISO 400 start showing grain and attenuated detail, so shooting in good light is advisable.
Autofocus System and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Focus Modes
With fixed lenses and small sensors, autofocus capabilities are basic but functional for snapshot photography.
- Both cameras feature contrast-detection autofocus with a single center AF point.
- The T400 offers rudimentary face detection, improving focus accuracy on people in the frame. This is absent on the JX370.
- Neither offers manual focus, touch-to-focus, or multiple AF points, limiting creative focus control.
- Autofocus response times are comparable and smooth in bright light but slow down under dim conditions or low contrast subjects.
- Continuous autofocus tracking is limited but adequate for casual moving subjects.
For disciplines like portraiture, the T400’s face detection may give an edge in achieving sharper eye focus, though neither model has specialized eye-detection AF typical of higher-end cameras.
Video Capabilities: Basic HD Recording Suitable for Casual Use
Both cameras record HD video at 1280 x 720 pixels at 30 frames per second, with the T400 adding H.264 compression alongside Motion JPEG, offering more efficient video storage.
- Audio capture is limited; no external microphone or headphone jacks make these unsuitable for professional vlogging or interviews.
- No advanced video features such as 4K, slow motion, or time lapse are supported.
- The lack of image stabilization on the JX370 can lead to more shake in handheld video, while the T400’s IBIS improves footage steadiness.
If video will be a major part of your workflow, consider using a separate dedicated camera or smartphone with specialized video tools.
Exploring Photography Genres: How Do These Cameras Perform?
Each photography niche has unique demands. Here’s how the two compacts stack up in various popular shooting styles:
Portrait Photography
- T400 edges ahead thanks to face detection autofocus and longer zoom for flattering headshots.
- The wider max aperture on the JX370 can render slightly more background blur (bokeh), although small sensor size limits true creamy out-of-focus effects.
- Both cameras litigate color fidelity decently for natural skin tones but cannot match DSLRs or mirrorless with larger sensors.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras offer adequate resolution for printing 8x10” or smaller prints.
- The JX370’s wider aperture and slightly lighter body favor portability.
- Neither camera is weather sealed, which is a drawback for shooting in inclement conditions.
- Zoom reach differences matter less here since wide angles are more used; both start at 28mm equivalent.
Wildlife Photography
- The T400’s 10x telephoto zoom (280mm equiv.) provides much greater reach to photograph distant subjects.
- The JX370’s 5x zoom limits framing flexibility.
- Autofocus speed and burst rates (1 fps on both) are insufficient for fast action, so expect missed fleeting moments.
Sports Photography
- Both cameras run at a slow 1 fps continuous shooting, too limited for fast sports.
- Autofocus tracking is basic; pro-level tracking is absent.
- Low light performance is weak; neither suits indoor or night sports well.
Street Photography
- The JX370’s smaller size makes it more discreet and easier to carry on city walks.
- Both cameras lack viewfinders, possibly awkward in bright sun.
- Low light sensitivity requires cautious exposure management.
Macro Photography
- The JX370 focuses down to 10 cm, while the T400 gets closer at 5 cm, enabling more detailed close-ups.
- The T400’s image stabilization can help when shooting tight macro handheld shots.
- Neither has focus stacking, but close focusing comes handy for casual macro portraits of flowers or small objects.
Night and Astro Photography
- Small sensors and limited ISO range restrict performance for low light and astrophotography.
- Long shutter speeds (up to 30 seconds in JX370) help but noise becomes a major factor.
- No bulb mode or advanced astro features available.
User Interface and Screen Quality: Framing and Reviewing Your Shots
The two cameras share a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD screen with 230k dot resolution, offering basic brightness and viewing angles.
- Neither model has a touchscreen, so all controls rely on buttons and basic menus.
- The lack of an electronic viewfinder forces dependence on the screen, sometimes challenging in bright daylight.
- The T400 does not offer live view autofocus, whereas JX370 features live view AF - helpful for capturing moving subjects with precision.
User interfaces are minimalistic but straightforward, correct for the cameras’ target users.
Battery Performance and Storage Flexibility
Both cameras use Fuji’s NP-45A rechargeable battery packs.
- The JX370 claims approximately 190 shots per charge, slightly better than the T400’s 180 shots.
- Real-world usage with LCD preview, zooming, and video reduces effective battery life.
- Both feature single SD/SDHC card slots; T400 adds SDXC support for larger cards.
- USB 2.0 data ports are identical, allowing for basic file transfers but no tethering or fast data offloading.
Sample Images: Real-World Comparisons
To illustrate differences, examine these gallery images captured under various conditions, showcasing each camera’s capabilities.
- Outdoor daylight shots show both cameras produce pleasing color saturation.
- The T400’s longer zoom captures distant subjects with less quality degradation.
- Indoor low-light shots reveal the advantage of the T400’s image stabilization, reducing blur.
- Portraits highlight subtle skin tone rendering differences and the benefit of face detection autofocus in the T400.
Final Performance Ratings: How Do They Stack Up?
After extensive testing across photography scenarios, here’s our consolidated assessment scoring each camera’s overall performance.
- The Fujifilm T400 wins on zoom range, image stabilization, and autofocus versatility.
- The JX370 ranks slightly higher for portability, aperture speed at wide angle, and battery longevity.
- Both excel as easy-to-use compact cameras but fall short for demanding enthusiasts seeking manual control or professional features.
Specialized Genre Scores: Matching Cameras to Your Photography Interests
To help you pinpoint your best fit, here is a breakdown showing our ratings for important photography types.
- Portraits & Macro: T400 preferred for face detection and closer focusing.
- Landscape & Travel: JX370 favored for lighter weight and speed.
- Wildlife & Sports: T400’s longer zoom helps with distant subjects but both limited by slow frame rates.
- Street & Night: JX370’s discreetness and aperture help, but both have noise issues in low light.
- Video: T400’s H.264 codec offers a slight video edge.
Who Should Choose Which Camera? Clear Recommendations from Experience
-
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 if:
- You want a lightweight, pocket-sized point-and-shoot.
- Your primary uses are travel, street, and daylight portraiture.
- Aperture speed (f/2.6) helps your shooting style in moderate low light.
- You prefer simple controls without extra video formats to worry about.
-
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix T400 if:
- Zoom reach is a priority - for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
- You want the advantage of sensor-shift image stabilization to minimize blur.
- Face detection autofocus enhances your portrait shots.
- Slightly heavier body is acceptable for greater versatility.
- You shoot occasional HD video and want improved compression efficiency.
Wrapping Up: Navigating Your Next Step in Compact Photography
Both Fujifilm FinePix JX370 and T400 offer reliable, easy-to-use packages for photography enthusiasts stepping up from smartphones or entry-level compacts. Each has strengths targeting slightly different users:
- JX370 serves well as a lightweight travel or street camera optimized for daylight shooting.
- T400 pitches towards users needing strong zoom, better stabilization, and rudimentary portrait AF.
In this price segment, you gain convenience and decent image quality but should temper expectations on low light and fast action performance.
If you’re starting your creative journey or want an uncomplicated secondary camera, either model could fit. For more versatility and video, the T400 slightly leads.
Our advice: Hold each in your hand, try focusing and zooming, and see which feels right ergonomically and intuitively. Test shooting in your typical lighting conditions if possible. The best camera is one you enjoy using regularly.
Accessories and Further Exploration
To get the most from these cameras:
- Invest in a sturdy SDHC or SDXC card for ample storage.
- Consider a compact tripod especially for low light or macro work.
- Use external LED lighting to compensate for limited high ISO performance.
- Explore basic photo editing software to refine colors and crop compositions.
With this comprehensive knowledge, you’re now equipped to confidently select the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 or T400 tailored to your photographic goals. Start capturing your creative vision today and enjoy the journey!
Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | Fujifilm FinePix T400 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-08-11 | 2012-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3440 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/3.4-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1800 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 pictures | 180 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD / SDHC / SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $159 | $150 |