Clicky

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix JX370 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix T400 front
Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
28
Overall
34

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 Key Specs

Fujifilm JX370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
  • 124g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
  • Released August 2011
Fujifilm T400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm FinePix JX370 vs. Fujifilm FinePix T400: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right compact camera can be daunting, especially when two models come from the same trusted brand and share many features yet deliver distinct experiences. In this in-depth comparison, we place the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 head-to-head with the Fujifilm FinePix T400. Both are small sensor compacts aimed at casual shooters and enthusiasts who want simple usability without sacrificing versatility.

Drawing on years of hands-on testing and technical analysis, we’ll uncover which camera fits your creative needs across genres like portraiture, landscape, sports, and beyond. We’ll break down real-world performance, technical aspects, ergonomics, and value so you can make an informed choice. Let’s get started!

Unpacking the Essentials: Key Specs at a Glance

Before diving deep, here’s a concise side-by-side summary of the main specifications to set the stage:

Feature Fujifilm FinePix JX370 Fujifilm FinePix T400
Sensor Type CCD, 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) CCD, 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm)
Resolution 14 MP 16 MP
Lens 28-140mm equiv. (5x zoom), f/2.6-6.2 28-280mm equiv. (10x zoom), f/3.4-5.6
Image Stabilization None Sensor-shift (IBIS)
ISO Range 100-1600 (3200 boost) 100-1600 (3200 boost)
Autofocus System Contrast-detection, center AF Contrast-detection, center AF + Face detection
Continuous Shooting 1.0 fps 1.0 fps
Video 720p at 30 fps, MJPEG format 720p at 30 fps, MJPEG & H.264 formats
Screen 2.7” Fixed TFT LCD, 230k dots 2.7” Fixed TFT LCD, 230k dots
Weight 124 g 159 g
Dimensions (WxHxD in mm) 95 x 57 x 24 104 x 59 x 29
Battery Life Approx. 190 shots Approx. 180 shots
Storage SD / SDHC SD / SDHC / SDXC
Price (at launch) $159 $149.95

We immediately see the T400 offers a significant telephoto advantage in zoom and includes sensor-shift image stabilization - two potentially decisive features depending on your photography style.

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 size comparison

Design, Build Quality, and Ergonomics: Handling & Controls Compared

Both cameras epitomize Fujifilm’s compact and straightforward design ethos geared toward casual users. However, subtle differences influence handling and usability.

  • Fujifilm JX370 is smaller and lighter, weighing just 124 grams and measuring 95x57x24mm. Its slim profile makes it pocket-friendly for travel and street photography.
  • Fujifilm T400 is slightly larger and heavier at 159 grams and 104x59x29mm, reflecting its extended zoom and added stabilization hardware.

Both feature fixed TFT LCDs of identical size and resolution without touch functionality, limiting interaction modes. The JX370 lacks any built-in image stabilization, which might impact handheld shots.

Looking at the top view comparison, both cameras offer simple control layouts without dedicated dials for aperture or shutter priority modes, emphasizing an automatic shooting experience suitable for beginners.

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 top view buttons comparison

Ergonomics favor the JX370’s compact footprint for portability and discrete shooting situations like urban street photography. The T400’s grip is marginally larger, which may appeal if you prefer a slightly bulkier feel for telephoto framing and stability.

Note: Neither camera offers a viewfinder, electronic or optical, so reliance on the LCD screen is mandatory for composing shots outdoors.

Sensor and Image Quality: What to Expect from the Small CCD Sensors

Both models rely on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, with minor differences in megapixel count (14MP for JX370 and 16MP for T400). Although the resolution edge favors the T400, practical image quality will depend on more than pixel count alone.

  • The CCD sensor excels at delivering punchy colors and relatively low noise at base ISO.
  • The limited sensor size dictates compromises in dynamic range and high ISO performance compared to larger sensors.

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 sensor size comparison

ISO Sensitivity: Both cameras have a native max ISO of 1600 with extended boosts to 3200, but CCD sensors typically struggle with noise beyond ISO 800 under low light.

Image Stabilization: The T400 includes sensor-shift image stabilization, a rare feature in this class. This helps in low-light scenarios and when shooting at telephoto focal lengths, compensating for minor hand shacks and enhancing sharpness.

Lens Impact: The JX370’s f/2.6 maximum aperture at wide end is faster than the T400’s f/3.4, counterbalancing somewhat the lack of IS in low light.

Real-world results: Our tests show both cameras produce decent JPEGs for web sharing and casual prints up to 8x10”. However, images taken beyond ISO 400 start showing grain and attenuated detail, so shooting in good light is advisable.

Autofocus System and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Focus Modes

With fixed lenses and small sensors, autofocus capabilities are basic but functional for snapshot photography.

  • Both cameras feature contrast-detection autofocus with a single center AF point.
  • The T400 offers rudimentary face detection, improving focus accuracy on people in the frame. This is absent on the JX370.
  • Neither offers manual focus, touch-to-focus, or multiple AF points, limiting creative focus control.
  • Autofocus response times are comparable and smooth in bright light but slow down under dim conditions or low contrast subjects.
  • Continuous autofocus tracking is limited but adequate for casual moving subjects.

For disciplines like portraiture, the T400’s face detection may give an edge in achieving sharper eye focus, though neither model has specialized eye-detection AF typical of higher-end cameras.

Video Capabilities: Basic HD Recording Suitable for Casual Use

Both cameras record HD video at 1280 x 720 pixels at 30 frames per second, with the T400 adding H.264 compression alongside Motion JPEG, offering more efficient video storage.

  • Audio capture is limited; no external microphone or headphone jacks make these unsuitable for professional vlogging or interviews.
  • No advanced video features such as 4K, slow motion, or time lapse are supported.
  • The lack of image stabilization on the JX370 can lead to more shake in handheld video, while the T400’s IBIS improves footage steadiness.

If video will be a major part of your workflow, consider using a separate dedicated camera or smartphone with specialized video tools.

Exploring Photography Genres: How Do These Cameras Perform?

Each photography niche has unique demands. Here’s how the two compacts stack up in various popular shooting styles:

Portrait Photography

  • T400 edges ahead thanks to face detection autofocus and longer zoom for flattering headshots.
  • The wider max aperture on the JX370 can render slightly more background blur (bokeh), although small sensor size limits true creamy out-of-focus effects.
  • Both cameras litigate color fidelity decently for natural skin tones but cannot match DSLRs or mirrorless with larger sensors.

Landscape Photography

  • Both cameras offer adequate resolution for printing 8x10” or smaller prints.
  • The JX370’s wider aperture and slightly lighter body favor portability.
  • Neither camera is weather sealed, which is a drawback for shooting in inclement conditions.
  • Zoom reach differences matter less here since wide angles are more used; both start at 28mm equivalent.

Wildlife Photography

  • The T400’s 10x telephoto zoom (280mm equiv.) provides much greater reach to photograph distant subjects.
  • The JX370’s 5x zoom limits framing flexibility.
  • Autofocus speed and burst rates (1 fps on both) are insufficient for fast action, so expect missed fleeting moments.

Sports Photography

  • Both cameras run at a slow 1 fps continuous shooting, too limited for fast sports.
  • Autofocus tracking is basic; pro-level tracking is absent.
  • Low light performance is weak; neither suits indoor or night sports well.

Street Photography

  • The JX370’s smaller size makes it more discreet and easier to carry on city walks.
  • Both cameras lack viewfinders, possibly awkward in bright sun.
  • Low light sensitivity requires cautious exposure management.

Macro Photography

  • The JX370 focuses down to 10 cm, while the T400 gets closer at 5 cm, enabling more detailed close-ups.
  • The T400’s image stabilization can help when shooting tight macro handheld shots.
  • Neither has focus stacking, but close focusing comes handy for casual macro portraits of flowers or small objects.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Small sensors and limited ISO range restrict performance for low light and astrophotography.
  • Long shutter speeds (up to 30 seconds in JX370) help but noise becomes a major factor.
  • No bulb mode or advanced astro features available.

User Interface and Screen Quality: Framing and Reviewing Your Shots

The two cameras share a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD screen with 230k dot resolution, offering basic brightness and viewing angles.

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • Neither model has a touchscreen, so all controls rely on buttons and basic menus.
  • The lack of an electronic viewfinder forces dependence on the screen, sometimes challenging in bright daylight.
  • The T400 does not offer live view autofocus, whereas JX370 features live view AF - helpful for capturing moving subjects with precision.

User interfaces are minimalistic but straightforward, correct for the cameras’ target users.

Battery Performance and Storage Flexibility

Both cameras use Fuji’s NP-45A rechargeable battery packs.

  • The JX370 claims approximately 190 shots per charge, slightly better than the T400’s 180 shots.
  • Real-world usage with LCD preview, zooming, and video reduces effective battery life.
  • Both feature single SD/SDHC card slots; T400 adds SDXC support for larger cards.
  • USB 2.0 data ports are identical, allowing for basic file transfers but no tethering or fast data offloading.

Sample Images: Real-World Comparisons

To illustrate differences, examine these gallery images captured under various conditions, showcasing each camera’s capabilities.

  • Outdoor daylight shots show both cameras produce pleasing color saturation.
  • The T400’s longer zoom captures distant subjects with less quality degradation.
  • Indoor low-light shots reveal the advantage of the T400’s image stabilization, reducing blur.
  • Portraits highlight subtle skin tone rendering differences and the benefit of face detection autofocus in the T400.

Final Performance Ratings: How Do They Stack Up?

After extensive testing across photography scenarios, here’s our consolidated assessment scoring each camera’s overall performance.

  • The Fujifilm T400 wins on zoom range, image stabilization, and autofocus versatility.
  • The JX370 ranks slightly higher for portability, aperture speed at wide angle, and battery longevity.
  • Both excel as easy-to-use compact cameras but fall short for demanding enthusiasts seeking manual control or professional features.

Specialized Genre Scores: Matching Cameras to Your Photography Interests

To help you pinpoint your best fit, here is a breakdown showing our ratings for important photography types.

  • Portraits & Macro: T400 preferred for face detection and closer focusing.
  • Landscape & Travel: JX370 favored for lighter weight and speed.
  • Wildlife & Sports: T400’s longer zoom helps with distant subjects but both limited by slow frame rates.
  • Street & Night: JX370’s discreetness and aperture help, but both have noise issues in low light.
  • Video: T400’s H.264 codec offers a slight video edge.

Who Should Choose Which Camera? Clear Recommendations from Experience

  • Choose the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 if:

    • You want a lightweight, pocket-sized point-and-shoot.
    • Your primary uses are travel, street, and daylight portraiture.
    • Aperture speed (f/2.6) helps your shooting style in moderate low light.
    • You prefer simple controls without extra video formats to worry about.
  • Choose the Fujifilm FinePix T400 if:

    • Zoom reach is a priority - for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
    • You want the advantage of sensor-shift image stabilization to minimize blur.
    • Face detection autofocus enhances your portrait shots.
    • Slightly heavier body is acceptable for greater versatility.
    • You shoot occasional HD video and want improved compression efficiency.

Wrapping Up: Navigating Your Next Step in Compact Photography

Both Fujifilm FinePix JX370 and T400 offer reliable, easy-to-use packages for photography enthusiasts stepping up from smartphones or entry-level compacts. Each has strengths targeting slightly different users:

  • JX370 serves well as a lightweight travel or street camera optimized for daylight shooting.
  • T400 pitches towards users needing strong zoom, better stabilization, and rudimentary portrait AF.

In this price segment, you gain convenience and decent image quality but should temper expectations on low light and fast action performance.

If you’re starting your creative journey or want an uncomplicated secondary camera, either model could fit. For more versatility and video, the T400 slightly leads.

Our advice: Hold each in your hand, try focusing and zooming, and see which feels right ergonomically and intuitively. Test shooting in your typical lighting conditions if possible. The best camera is one you enjoy using regularly.

Accessories and Further Exploration

To get the most from these cameras:

  • Invest in a sturdy SDHC or SDXC card for ample storage.
  • Consider a compact tripod especially for low light or macro work.
  • Use external LED lighting to compensate for limited high ISO performance.
  • Explore basic photo editing software to refine colors and crop compositions.

With this comprehensive knowledge, you’re now equipped to confidently select the Fujifilm FinePix JX370 or T400 tailored to your photographic goals. Start capturing your creative vision today and enjoy the journey!

Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm T400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm JX370 and Fujifilm T400
 Fujifilm FinePix JX370Fujifilm FinePix T400
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm FujiFilm
Model Fujifilm FinePix JX370 Fujifilm FinePix T400
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-08-11 2012-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3440
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max boosted ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-6.2 f/3.4-5.6
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1800 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lb) 159 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 pictures 180 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-45A NP-45A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD / SDHC SD / SDHC / SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $159 $150