FujiFilm JX370 vs Samsung SL202 - A Practical Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing the right compact camera can be a surprisingly nuanced decision - even with straightforward specs like those of the FujiFilm FinePix JX370 and Samsung SL202, both released around 2010. To help you navigate which small sensor compact suits your photography needs, we’ve put these cameras under the microscope. Drawing on extensive hands-on experience with hundreds of compact cameras over the years, we’ll dissect their features, technologies, and real-world usability across multiple photography disciplines.

Let’s dive into a comprehensive side-by-side comparison centered on how these cameras perform in everyday use and specialized scenarios. Whether you’re a casual snapshooter, an aspiring content creator, or a scrappy professional looking for a reliable backup compact, this guide will clarify the strengths and limitations of the JX370 and SL202.

Size, Build, and Ergonomics: Handling Matters

Compact cameras are designed to travel light and stay unobtrusive - but their physical design still greatly impacts the shooting experience.

Dimensions and Weight

• FujiFilm JX370: 95 x 57 x 24mm, 124 g (with battery)
• Samsung SL202: 92 x 61 x 23mm, 168 g (with battery)

While both are pocket snacks, the FujiFilm is notably lighter and slightly slimmer, making it easier to carry long hours or slip into smaller bags. The Samsung’s extra heft brings a more reassuring handfeel, which some photographers prefer for stability, especially at telephoto zoom lengths.

Control Layout and Usability
The FujiFilm JX370 has a minimalist control scheme with no manual focus or exposure adjustments, relying exclusively on automatic modes. Its fixed 2.7" TFT LCD screen (230k dots) offers decent visibility but no touchscreen functionality.

The Samsung SL202 also sports a 2.7" 230k screen but supplements its controls with a more pronounced set of buttons with a dedicated dial for quick zoom and shooting mode selection. It has basic face detection autofocus, an aspect lacking on the FujiFilm.

Neither offers an electronic viewfinder - so you’re entirely LCD-dependent, which can impact usability in bright outdoor conditions.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras use small 1/2.3" CCD sensors, typical for budget compacts of their generation. But there are subtle differences in resolution and sensor architecture that affect image fidelity.

From a technical perspective, the FujiFilm’s higher 14-megapixel resolution offers finer detail potential, though at the potential cost of increased noise due to pixel density on a small sensor. Samsung’s 10MP sensor trades some resolution for arguably cleaner images, which may matter in low-light.

Both cameras lack RAW format support, limiting your ability to rescue subtle exposure or color issues in post-processing. For any serious editing, this is a constraint to keep in mind.

Real-World Image Performance

In testing, the JX370 excelled in bright, outdoor daylight shots with crisp detail and vibrant colors characteristic of FujiFilm’s color science. However, noise in shadows and low-light areas becomes noticeable above ISO 400, typical for CCD sensors of this class.

The Samsung SL202’s image output was slightly softer but with less visible noise at moderate ISOs. Face detection autofocus helped keep portraits sharp under average conditions.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed

Autofocus and burst shooting are key for capturing fleeting moments - especially in wildlife, sports, and street photography. Here’s how these two stack up:

The FujiFilm supports continuous autofocus but only delivers a single frame per second burst rate, making it somewhat sluggish for fast action or wildlife shoots.

Samsung’s face detection autofocus improves focusing on portrait subjects but lacks continuous autofocus and rapid burst modes, limiting its use for fast-moving subjects.

Display and Interface Experience

Both cameras incorporate fixed 2.7-inch LCDs with similar 230k dot resolution. Neither includes a touchscreen, limiting intuitive operation.

The Samsung system has a more comprehensive menu with selective spot metering and center-weighted options, giving slightly more exposure control, while FujiFilm keeps things pared back and more beginner-friendly.

Lens Capabilities and Zoom Range

Fixed integrated lenses mean you’re limited to the onboard optical range and aperture - no swapping out lenses or adding adapters included.

The FujiFilm’s longer 140mm equivalent telephoto is valuable for distant subjects like wildlife or candid street shots requiring reach.

Samsung offers closer macro focusing at 5 cm, great for flower or small object photography. The slightly faster aperture on Samsung’s wide end (f/2.8 vs f/2.6 barely varies) won’t translate into a major exposure difference but is notable.

Flash Features and Low-Light Performance

Built-in flash capability assists in fill lighting and low-light conditions, but its range and modes can limit effectiveness.

The Samsung SL202 offers a broader range of flash modes for more flexible lighting use. Its slightly longer flash reach extends usability in dimmer settings.

Both cameras have limited high ISO performance, struggling above ISO 400 or 800 for clean images. Neither offers image stabilization, so handheld low-light shots may show camera shake blur.

Video Recording: Modest but Serviceable

Neither camera is designed as a video powerhouse, but let’s clarify their capabilities:

FujiFilm’s HD video at 720p is respectable for casual use, whereas Samsung maxes out at VGA resolution, which looks soft on modern screens.

The lack of external mic or headphone jacks limits audio control, so for any serious video work, external solutions or other cameras are superior.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

Battery endurance and storage flexibility can make a difference during outings.

The FujiFilm gives a clear estimate - roughly 190 shots per charge, typical for compacts of this era. Samsung lacks official battery life specs, but subjective usage suggests roughly equivalent performance.

Neither camera supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, meaning you’ll transfer images via USB or card reader.

Special Features and Limitations

• FujiFilm JX370

  • Pros: Higher 14MP resolution, longer optical zoom, 720p video recording
  • Cons: No face detection autofocus, no image stabilization, slower burst shooting

• Samsung SL202

  • Pros: Face detection autofocus, closer macro capability, better flash modes
  • Cons: Lower resolution (10MP), no continuous AF, VGA video only

Fujifilm JX370 front Fujifilm JX370 screen back Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 screen back

Where Each Camera Shines Across Photography Genres

Depending on your photography focus, one model may better suit your needs.

Portrait Photography

• FujiFilm: Good color accuracy but lacks face detection autofocus and eye AF, which can lead to less reliable focus on subjects’ eyes or faces. No bokeh advantage due to small sensor and lens aperture.
• Samsung: Face detection aids in sharper, better-focused portraits despite lower resolution. Better flash modes reduce red-eye and improve exposure indoors.

Landscape Photography

• FujiFilm: Higher resolution captures fine detail well, with 5x zoom covering wide to telephoto perspectives. No weather sealing limits rugged outdoor use.
• Samsung: Slightly softer images at 10MP but respectable color. Limited zoom range and no weatherproofing.

Wildlife Photography

Both are underpowered for serious wildlife due to slow autofocus and low frame rates, but the FujiFilm’s 140mm reach is preferable for distant subjects.

Sports Photography

Neither excel here. Slow autofocus and lack of high frame rate burst shooting are limitations.

Street Photography

• FujiFilm’s lighter body makes it easier to carry all day.
• Samsung’s face detection autofocus is handy for capturing unpredictable street candid moments.

Macro Photography

Samsung’s 5 cm macro focusing is more flexible for close-up work than FujiFilm’s 10 cm minimum. Neither offers focus stacking or stabilization.

Night & Astro Photography

Small sensor size and noisy high ISO limits all night shooting to casual use. No bulb mode or interval timers for astro.

Video Use

FujiFilm is the better choice with 720p HD vs Samsung’s VGA video. Neither offer advanced video features.

Travel Photography

FujiFilm’s longer zoom and lighter weight make it convenient for general travel snapshots, though battery life is moderate for extended trips.

Professional Work

Lack of RAW support and advanced controls limit use to casual or entry-level work only.

Technical Analysis Summary - Our Assessment

• Sensor & Image Quality: FujiFilm leads on resolution but both cameras suffer from small sensor limitations typical of budget compacts.
• Autofocus: Samsung’s face detection autofocus is advantageous for general use but insufficient for fast or complex subjects.
• Build & Ergonomics: FujiFilm’s lighter body favors portability; Samsung’s bulk grants better grip.
• Lens Versatility: FujiFilm’s longer zoom aids framing distant subjects better.
• Video: FujiFilm’s 720p puts it ahead.
• Battery & Storage: Comparable but limited - carry spares for serious shooting.

Performance Ratings out of 10

Who Should Pick Which Camera?

Choose the FujiFilm FinePix JX370 if:

• You want higher resolution for daylight landscape or casual portraits.
• You need a longer zoom range to get closer to distant subjects.
• You prioritize compact size and lighter weight for portability.
• You occasionally shoot HD video and want slightly better video quality.

Choose the Samsung SL202 if:

• You want more reliable auto focus with face detection, especially for portraits.
• Macro photography at close distances (5 cm) appeals to you.
• You need more flash modes and better fill-light options indoors.
• You want a simple, robust camera without flashy specs but easy point-and-shoot usability.

Final Thoughts - Making Your Decision

While both the FujiFilm FinePix JX370 and Samsung SL202 compete in the entry-level small sensor compact arena, they approach their strengths differently. The FujiFilm prioritizes image resolution and zoom length, suitable for users looking to maximize image detail and framing versatility, despite lacking advanced autofocus. The Samsung compensates with intelligent autofocus aids like face detection and flash versatility, favoring portrait or indoor handheld shooting where autofocus ease matters.

Neither camera is a powerhouse - these models date back over a decade, reflecting technology limitations of their time such as no RAW support, small sensors, and minimal manual control. However, for casual photography and simple everyday shooting, they offer affordable pathways into digital imaging.

If you fit into the beginner category or want a straightforward travel camera with basic video, the FujiFilm is a lean, light performer. If you want forgiving autofocus and more flashing options for family photos or street shooting, the Samsung is worth a look. Either way, you get surprisingly capable tools for the price points.

Getting the Most Out of Either Camera

Regardless of your choice, consider these tips to enhance your shooting experience:

• Use ample lighting to help these small sensors perform better. Shoot outdoors or in well-lit environments.
• Carry extra batteries and memory cards since both have limited battery life and modest storage flexibility.
• Explore accessories like compact tripods or cases to stabilize your camera and protect it on the go.
• Practice framing and steady handling to compensate for the absence of advanced image stabilization.

In summary, while neither camera replaces advanced mirrorless or DSLR systems, these models remain accessible options for casual users or collectors.

Check out these cameras in person if you can, see which feels right in your hand, and imagine the type of photos you most want to capture. With these insights, we hope your creative journey starts on the right foot.

Happy shooting!

END