Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5020 was revealed 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FE-5020 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-5020
| XZ-2 iHS | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FE-5020 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The FE-5020 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging. The older FE-5020 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also called | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $160 | $450 |