Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro
95 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0777/d077721ecde7f54c1b31c0a91a4b4bf48c2f90df" alt="Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 front Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 129g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Fujifilm JZ100 versus Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ100 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm JZ100 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm JZ100 was launched 5 years before the Quattro and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm JZ100 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm JZ100 scores versus the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm JZ100 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ100 over the Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm JZ100 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm JZ100
Quattro | Fujifilm JZ100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 50 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ100 and Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm JZ100 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm JZ100 offers external measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm JZ100 versus Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm JZ100 versus the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83aa1/83aa1e18eb1959bab0c8b8eb0d3234e30f5e1b97" alt="Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm JZ100 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edc8e/edc8e4d0cdf9c4f5454cfde4caa85aa741a662b3" alt="Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ100 and Quattro.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm JZ100 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm JZ100 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/795ba/795bae335e554a65432e6d38b3ca5ccfa59fd4b7" alt="Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e051c/e051cf5f0d0abe93aa2f4a30e5f52c7ea1515e19" alt="Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 129g (0.28 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $190 | $738 |