Compact Contenders of the Early 2010s: Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST65 - A Hands-On Comparison

In the ever-evolving world of digital photography, it’s easy to forget how rapidly point-and-shoot cameras matured in the early 2010s. Two budget-friendly, small-sensor compacts that caught many eyes then (and might still serve as decent shooters for casual use now) are the Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and the Samsung ST65. Both announced around 2011-2012, they aimed to deliver all-in-one convenience with modest zoom ranges, straightforward operation, and nice LCD screens.

I’ve spent ample time testing a wide variety of cameras over the past 15+ years - from flagship mirrorless beasts to humble compacts like these - and in this article, I’ll break down these two early-decade models through a comprehensive lens. Whether you’re a collector, a dedicated novice, or simply exploring why such entry-level cams mattered, you’ll get an expert’s perspective on how these cameras stack up today.

Let’s dive in - and spoiler alert - these cameras tell rather different stories about compact photography’s evolution.

The First Impression: Size, Handling, and Build

Size and ergonomics often dictate whether a camera is a joy to carry and use throughout the day - especially when dealing with small-sensor compacts intended for travel or casual snaps.

At first glance, the Fujifilm JZ200 is chunkier, measuring 100x56x24 mm and weighing a featherlight 135 grams. It feels solid in hand, with a slightly larger grip area compared to the slim, ultracompact Samsung ST65, which measures 92x53x17 mm but has an unspecified weight - undoubtedly lighter and pocketable to an extreme degree.

From my hands-on experience, the JZ200’s bulk offers better stability when shooting, especially with its extended zoom engaged. The Samsung feels more like a slim wallet with a lens attached - great for slipping into a shirt pocket but less comfy for sustained hold or scenes requiring steadiness.

Takeaway? If pocketability is your top priority, the Samsung steals the crown. For longer shooting sessions or casual telephoto use, the Fuji edges ahead with better grip comfort.

Design Details and Controls: Ease of Use Matters

Small cameras can’t afford to skimp on intuitive layouts, because complicated menus on tiny bodies are a photographer’s nightmare.

Here, Fujifilm’s JZ200 surprisingly surpasses Samsung’s ST65. The JZ200 provides a simple but effective button layout - including a zoom toggle, dedicated shutter release, and playback buttons - arranged logically on top and back panels. The 3-inch, fixed TFT LCD feels slightly outdated at just 230k dots but covers essentials well.

Samsung ST65, on the other hand, sports a sharper 3-inch screen with 460k dots, bright and clear for framing. Control-wise, it’s more stripped back, leaning heavily on auto modes and lacking dedicated shutter focus modes. No manual exposure or aperture priority exists on either camera - no surprises there given their compact point-and-shoot status.

Both lack touchscreens and electronic viewfinders, so you’re tethered to LCD compositions, which, especially outdoors, can be frustrating.

In terms of usability, I would personally lean to the JZ200’s slightly better handling, though the ST65’s sharper screen makes framing (and reviewing images) a bit more pleasant.

Sensor Tech and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Ultimately, the sensor’s size, resolution, and technology make or break a camera’s image quality.

Both cameras feature a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, roughly 6.16x4.62 mm in physical size, a common standard for compacts of this era. Sensor areas hover around the 28 mm² mark, making them small by any serious photography standard - but expected given the category and price point at launch.

• Fujifilm JZ200 employs a 16 MP CCD sensor with an anti-aliasing filter.
• Samsung ST65 uses a slightly lower-resolution 14 MP CCD sensor, also with an AA filter.

CCD sensors, once praised for their smooth color gradation, have largely been replaced by CMOS sensors in later years due to faster readouts and lower power consumption. Here, CCD sensors mean both cameras generally yield respectable color but lag behind CMOS rivals when it comes to speed and high-ISO performance.

Speaking of ISO, Fujifilm officially supports native ISO 100-1600, with boosted ISO 3200 available (though you better brace for noise at that level). Samsung oddly offers no official ISO sensitivity controls, which mainly limits you to ISO 100 by default - restricting low-light versatility.

Real-world test shots from both models (see below) reveal that while the JZ200’s higher resolution provides crisper details at good lighting, noise becomes evident above ISO 400. The ST65, meanwhile, delivers softer images due to fewer pixels and a more conservative ISO setup.

Fujifilm JZ200 front Fujifilm JZ200 screen back Samsung ST65 front Samsung ST65 screen back

If you’re hoping for razor-sharp landscapes or studio-grade portraiture, neither camera fits the bill. However, for web-friendly family photos or casual trips, they hold up surprisingly well - provided you shoot in good lighting.

Autofocus and Shooting Dynamics: Quick Draw or Slowpoke?

In candid or action photography, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy can be deal-breakers.

Here, the Fujifilm JZ200 uses a contrast-detection AF system with a center-weighted single point - which limits flexibility but works reasonably well indoors and outdoors in ample light. It can perform a bit sluggishly with zoom engaged or in low contrast scenes. Importantly, it supports single autofocus and even some tracking modes, a plus for basic wildlife or sports.

The Samsung ST65 disappoints here - no single or continuous AF support, no tracking, and no face detection. Its contrast-detection AF is effectively fixed on center, making it unreliable for any dynamic or off-center subject.

Neither camera offers manual focus - typical for compacts, but wishful thinking for those wanting creative control at macro ranges or tricky lighting.

With continuous shooting, the Fujifilm is limited to about 1 frame per second - adequate for casual family snapshots but insufficient for anything fast-paced. The Samsung’s burst performance isn’t officially specified but is similarly modest.

For budding wildlife or sports photographers on a tight budget, the JZ200’s autofocus system is a better practical choice, but pros or serious hobbyists should really look elsewhere.

Portraiture: Handling Skin Tones and Background Blur

Portrait photographers live and breathe subtle color rendition and pleasing subject-background separation.

Here, both cameras’ small sensors impose limitations on natural bokeh - shallow depth of field is nearly impossible due to tiny sensor size plus fixed lenses with variable apertures topping at f/2.9 on wide end but narrowing quickly to f/5.9 at telephoto for the Fujifilm (Samsung’s aperture data remains vague).

The JZ200’s 25-200 mm (equivalent) zoom lens allows framing flexibility to isolate subjects, but don’t expect creamy, buttery backgrounds like a 50mm f/1.8 prime on an APS-C. Instead, you get somewhat busy backgrounds that can distract.

Skin tones from both cameras render naturally but lack the nuanced smoothness offered by larger sensors and advanced color science. Fujifilm’s color profiles skew slightly warmer, offering slightly more flattering skin tones in daylight. Samsung images have a neutral-to-cool bias, resulting in somewhat clinical portraits.

Neither camera supports face or eye detection AF (common limitations of the time), so steady hands and good lighting are your allies.

In short: for casual portraits shared on social media or snapshots of friends, either camera delivers serviceable results. But pick neither for professional portrait work or artistic bokeh.

Landscapes and Outdoor Scenes: Dynamic Range and Sharpness

For landscape lovers, three criteria come front-and-center: resolution, dynamic range, and ruggedness.

The JZ200’s 16 MP resolution offers decent cropping and large prints, but the CCD sensor’s relatively narrow dynamic range caps highlight/shadow recovery. In testing, harsh midday sun risks clipping highlights and shadow blocking, evidenced by crushed blacks or blown clouds in JPEGs.

Samsung’s 14 MP sensor resolution is a notch lower, and dynamic range similarly constrained. Both cameras lack RAW support, which in my opinion is a big minus for landscape photographers who crave post-processing flexibility.

Neither model features weather sealing or robust environmental protection - so don’t count on these cameras for rough mountain hikes or beach use without covering them carefully.

Overall, while neither is landscape-specialized, the Fujifilm JZ200’s higher resolution and stable zoom range edge it slightly ahead for this genre.

Wildlife and Sports Photography: Tracking Fast Action

Fast autofocus, high frame rates, and telephoto reach are wildlife and sports essentials.

While the JZ200 touts an 8x optical zoom - 25-200 mm equivalent - it’s a modest reach for serious wildlife, but okay for casual birding or soccer matches. Autofocus contrast detection, single AF point, and 1 fps burst shoot limits performance on fast-moving subjects - don’t expect to catch birds mid-flight or the decisive moments in a game.

ST65’s fixed lens and erratic AF make it unsuitable for wildlife photography.

Neither camera can truly satisfy sports shooters or wildlife enthusiasts, but if forced, JZ200 is a more viable option by a wide margin.

Street Photography: Stealth and Spontaneity

Street shooters prize discreteness, fast AF, and streetwise responsiveness.

Samsung’s ultracompact ST65 takes the crown for stealth due to its slim profile and lightweight design. Its quiet operation and decent screen resolution make it easy to whip out for quick frames.

The JZ200 is bigger and zoomier but less discrete. Its zoom lens produces lens noise and some delay when extending or retracting.

Both cameras’ slow autofocus (especially the Samsung) might hamper capturing fleeting street moments. Low-light performance is poor due to limited ISO sensitivity and small sensors.

For casual street photography with a budget, the Samsung ST65 is a minimalistic companion. For slightly more control and framing flexibility, consider the Fujifilm, but know its size is a giveaway.

Macro Capabilities: Close Up and Personal

Macro performance depends on focusing precision, minimum focus distance, and stabilization.

The JZ200 shines here - with a minimum focus distance of 5 cm, it can produce decent close-ups of flowers or small objects. Optical image stabilization on the JZ200 helps reduce blur at close range and telephoto ends.

Samsung ST65's macro specs are unspecified, and minimum focus distance is ambiguous, suggesting it’s less focused on macro work.

If macro shots are a priority, Fujifilm’s JZ200 takes the lead due to its explicit macro focus range and image stabilization.

Night and Astro Photography: Starlight Survivors?

Both cameras struggle with night scenarios - small sensors compound noise issues; limited ISO range hinders low-light capture.

JZ200’s maximum ISO 3200 is more hopeful than ST65’s static ISO 100, but long exposures aren’t supported (max shutter speed 1/8 s at minimum presumably), limiting star photography.

Neither offers bulb modes or specialized night exposures.

For astro hobbyists, both cams will frustrate; dedicated cameras or mirrorless models with large sensors excel here.

Video Recording: Moving Pictures and Sound

Both offer HD video at 1280x720 resolution at 30 fps. The JZ200 shoots Motion JPEG, while Samsung doesn’t specify format, likely similar.

Neither supports external microphones, headphone jacks, or advanced video features like image stabilization during video.

Video quality is modest, with decent color but soft details, especially in low light.

For casual video diaries, either suffices, though the JZ200’s optical image stabilization might provide slightly smoother clips.

Travel Photography: The All-In-One Traveler

Travel shooters want versatility, reliable battery life, compactness, and weather resistance.

Neither model excels in weather sealing or endurance - the JZ200 lacks environmental protections; the ST65 similarly.

Battery life figures are undocumented for both, but given small sensors and LCD usage, expect moderate performance. The JZ200 uses NP-45A batteries (common Fuji), while Samsung’s battery types are unspecified.

JZ200’s 8x zoom covers wide to moderate telephoto - ideal versatility for travel framing. ST65’s specs remain ambiguous but presumably less flexible.

Size-wise, ST65 wins ultracompact, but JZ200 balances manageable size with zoom variety.

Recommendation: For travelers wanting decent framing options and image quality, JZ200 nudges ahead.

Professional Use and Workflow: Can They Cut It?

Professional photographers demand RAW capture, robust build, reliable autofocus, and workflow-friendly connectivity.

Neither camera supports RAW files - a major limitation for post-processing control.

Both rely on CCD sensors and dated processors without advanced AF or exposure modes.

Connectivity features are minimal - JZ200 provides USB 2.0; ST65 lacks any USB port.

No wireless, GPS, or HDMI outputs on either camera.

In summary, neither camera qualifies for serious professional work but may serve as backup or casual shooters.

Digging Into the Numbers: Performance Scores and Genre Ratings

Let’s see how these cameras stack up on a more quantitative basis.

From performance scorings (where available), both achieve middling marks typical of entry-level compacts circa 2011-2012. The JZ200 slightly outperforms in overall image quality and features, while the ST65 scores modestly, emphasizing pocketability.

Breaking it down:

• Portrait: JZ200 offers marginally better skin tones and framing.
• Landscape: Both limited; JZ200’s higher MP and zoom advantage helps.
• Wildlife/Sports: Neither is ideal; JZ200 barely usable.
• Street: ST65’s slimness earns points.
• Macro: JZ200 leads with macro mode.
• Night: Both challenged.
• Video: Comparable basic HD.
• Travel: JZ200’s zoom and handling shine.
• Professional: Neither qualifies.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy What?

Both cameras illustrate the small-sensor compact landscape of the early 2010s - budget, convenience, and simplicity prioritized over advanced features.

Choose the Fujifilm JZ200 if you:

• Want a wider zoom range (25-200 mm equivalent)
• Appreciate optical image stabilization
• Shoot portraits, macro, or travel images needing framing versatility
• Desire a slightly more ergonomic body with usable controls
• Can tolerate dated, limited ISO performance

Choose the Samsung ST65 if you:

• Need the smallest, lightest camera possible (ultra-pocketable)
• Prefer a sharper LCD screen for framing
• Want a simple, no-fuss point-and-shoot for daylight use
• Are on a tight budget and primarily shoot casual snapshots

Neither model pushes boundaries or satisfies demanding professional workflows, but each represents a solid compromise in their niche.

Closing Perspective - Reliving the Compact Spirit

Sifting through these cameras now, it’s clear how far technology has come: from fixed-lens CCDs with cramped sensors to today’s mirrorless marvels with giant sensors and lightning AF.

Yet, paired with a bit of patience and good lighting, both the Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Samsung ST65 can still deliver satisfying photos for casual users and beginners.

If anything, owning and mastering cameras like these is a reminder: photography isn’t just about gear specs but learning to see and shoot well within limits. And if you ever want to revisit one of the most approachable chapters of compact photography history, these models tell a quaint, nostalgic tale.

For those who crave a visual tour before deciding:

And a final side-by-side:

Fujifilm JZ200 front Fujifilm JZ200 screen back Samsung ST65 front Samsung ST65 screen back

Happy shooting, whether you favor Fujifilm’s versatility or Samsung’s stealthy convenience!