Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1/Fujifilm-Real-3D-W1-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Kodak Sport, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the Sport (12MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was launched 17 months prior to the Sport which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades against the Sport in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Kodak EasyShare Sport. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Kodak Sport
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.8" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Sport | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Kodak Sport
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 enjoys outer dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has sizing of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Kodak Sport in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the Sport.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sport is 90 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sport.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Sport to show more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.8 inch | 2.4 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 112k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-95 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $900 | $155 |