Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49e87/49e87370fa49dea2e26560662d9ff1039089e86f" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was announced 5 months before the Tough-3000 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Tough-3000 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus Tough-3000
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has got exterior measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa7fc/aa7fcfbd89eaa2b8af41c0ea9579e3fb6e43a66c" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Tough-3000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34ed7/34ed7916c734fc14406abfbd537326c488175ced" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus Tough-3000 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfe57/dfe57b78d1d2ae98a757b4cef264eadb405650ae" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf14f/bf14fc248ff301f8f00fbf020700a493fb825cb4" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | RP (Real Photo) 3D | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 8cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $900 | $0 |