Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and PL200 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled within a month of the PL200 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores vs the PL200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Samsung PL200. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| PL200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the PL200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and PL200.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung PL200 to produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-08-17 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,150k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $900 | $0 |