Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front
 
Sony Alpha A7R II front
Portability
68
Imaging
75
Features
84
Overall
78

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Sony A7R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Succeeded the Sony A7R
  • Successor is Sony A7R III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

From Compact 3D Snaps to Pro-Level Full-Frame: Comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony A7R II

In the world of digital cameras, choice is abundant - but striking the right balance between budget, capability, and purpose isn’t always straightforward. Today we’re putting two very different cameras head to head: the quirky Fujifilm Real 3D W3, a unique compact from 2010 specializing in stereoscopic 3D, and the highly professional Sony Alpha A7R II, a full-frame mirrorless powerhouse renowned since 2015.

I've personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, ranging from pocket-friendly compacts to serious pro-level rigs, evaluating everything from sensor performance to handling under real shooting conditions. Here’s a deep dive into these two models, weaving technical insights with practical real-world stories so you can decide which camera fits your vision - and budget.

Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Build, and Handling

First impressions matter - and boy, these two don’t just differ in specs, they live in completely different size and handling galaxies.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II size comparison

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is a pocket-sized compact with a plastic body weighing just 230 grams and measuring roughly 124x66x28 mm. If you want a lightweight companion for casual or travel use that won’t cramp your pockets, this camera ticks that box, though with limited physical controls - it’s closer to an advanced point-and-shoot toy.

On the flipside, the Sony A7R II feels like a bona fide professional tool in hand. At 627 grams and a chunkier 127x96x60 mm body built around a magnesium alloy chassis, it offers solid grip and weather-sealing. This heft isn’t just bulk; it translates to a sense of reliability for demanding shoots. The A7R II sports a traditional SLR-style mirrorless shape with clubs for your thumbs in key spots - ideal for extended shooting sessions. The ergonomics suite is built for photographers who want quick access to settings via dials and buttons, not menus.

While the Fujifilm’s ultracompactness is a charm for street photographers or cheapskates alike, the Sony’s substantial build lends itself to professionals or enthusiasts who prioritize durability and direct manual control.

Top Controls and Interface: Familiarity vs. Minimalism

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II top view buttons comparison

Peeking at the top plates illustrates the design philosophies: The Sony A7R II boasts an array of control dials - mode dial, exposure compensation, shutter speed, and more - frameable for tactile changes on the fly. It’s the camera’s cockpit.

Conversely, the W3’s controls are sparse, mostly menu-driven with aperture priority being the only semi-manual exposure mode. Sure, it simplifies operation but at the cost of creative flexibility. For those used to adjusting shutter speeds or ISO instinctively, the W3 might feel restrictive.

Sensors and Image Quality: A Leap from 10MP CCD to 42MP Full-Frame CMOS

Now we get to the heart of imaging - the sensor. The difference here is a chasm.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II sensor size comparison

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sports a small 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55mm with a 10MP resolution. Back in 2010, this sensor was typical for compacts but looks quite dated by modern standards. Its small size results in limited light capture, which affects dynamic range, low-light ability, and detail resolution. The included anti-alias filter softens images, which helps avoid moiré but further reduces sharpness.

On the other hand, the Sony A7R II packs a massive full-frame 35.9 x 24 mm backside-illuminated CMOS sensor with an imposing 42.4MP count, and no anti-alias filter for razor-sharp resolutions. With sensor tech improvements including a back-illuminated design to enhance light gathering, it achieves exceptional dynamic range (~14 stops measured), excellent color depth (26 bits on DxOmark), and stunning high ISO performance (ISO 100-25600 native, expandable to 102400).

To put it plainly: the Sony A7R II crushes the W3 in image quality, especially in demanding scenes with shadows and highlights or low-light situations. But remember, this sophistication comes with a much heftier price tag.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Compose and Review in Your Preferred Way

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The W3 has a single fixed 3.5-inch LCD screen with a modest resolution of 1150k dots, adequate for reviewing 3D and 2D shots. It lacks touchscreen functionality or articulating mechanics, limiting versatility for tricky angles or vlogging. No electronic viewfinder (EVF) means composing entirely via the rear screen - it works fine for casual use but can be frustrating in bright sunlight.

Sony gives you a 3.0-inch tilting LCD with 1,229k dots and a much-needed high-resolution EVF boasting 2,359k dots and 100% coverage, giving you a bright, detailed preview in variable lighting - a must-have for professionals working outdoors. Although no touch sensitivity here, the joystick and buttons streamline menu navigation.

The Sony interface caters to efficiency under pressure, while Fujifilm keeps it simple but somewhat dated.

Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: From Basic Contrast AF to 399-Point Hybrid AF

The Real 3D W3 uses a basic contrast detection autofocus system and offers only single AF mode with center-weighted AF area selection. It does not support face or eye detection, continuous autofocus, or tracking. So for action, animals, or unpredictable subjects, expect some hunting or slow focus.

By contrast, the Sony A7R II revolutionized autofocus by combining 399 phase-detection points covering 45% of the frame, assisted by 25 contrast detection points. It supports face detection, tracking, selective AF areas, continuous AF, and eye AF for precise portraits. The body’s AF system locks quickly and tracks erratic subjects with impressive accuracy - a boon for wildlife and sports shooters.

Shooting speeds show similar disparity: The W3 lacks burst mode, whereas the A7R II can shoot steady 5 fps continuous bursts at full resolution, enough for many sports applications.

Exploring Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Fits

Portraits: Bokeh Beauty or Basic Snapshots?

If you’re hunting for creamy bokeh, precise eye detection, and skin tone fidelity, the Sony A7R II again shines. Paired with Sony’s vast E-mount lenses including fast primes and portrait favorites (like the 85mm f/1.8), this setup delivers best-in-class portrait images with exquisite background separation and outstanding tonal rendition. The eye-af feature means nearly effortless focus on subjects’ eyes - a dream for wedding or editorial photographers.

The Fujifilm W3, with its small sensor and fixed 35-105mm (equivalent to 200-600mm crop factor!) lens with a max aperture of f/3.7-4.2, simply cannot isolate subjects well. The small sensor means deep depth of field even at longest zoom, resulting in flat portraits with limited bokeh. Plus, the lack of autofocus face/eye detection limits sharp portrait capture precision.

Landscape: Big Sensor, Big Stamina, or Minimalist Snap

Capturing expanses with vivid details, color gradations, and robust dynamic range is where sensor size and image quality count most.

The Sony A7R II’s full-frame sensor and 42MP resolution allow enormous 8000+ pixel wide files that crop or print huge while retaining sharpness. Its 14 stops of DR captures subtle cloud gradients and shadow detail. Weather sealing means you can take it rain or shine. Battery life (approx 290 shots per charge) is respectable for serious outdoor use.

The Fuji W3’s little sensor limits both DR and ultimate resolution, capping image quality when printing large or cropping. Weather sealing isn’t present, and the camera’s flash range is only 3.6 meters - limiting usefulness in natural light. For casual travel landscapes on sunny days, it’s fine, but it won’t deliver gallery-grade results.

Wildlife: Focus and Speed to Catch the Action

Wildlife demands lightning-fast and accurate autofocus, high ISO for low light, and a broad native telephoto range.

Here the Sony A7R II excels with its hybrid AF system’s tracking prowess and support for pro-level telephoto lenses in the E-mount ecosystem - think 400mm primes with image stabilization. The 5-axis sensor-based stabilization reduces blur when handholding big zooms. Burst shooting at 5 fps may frustrate extreme sports photographers but is solid for many wildlife scenarios.

The Fuji W3 has none of this - fixed-lens, slow contrast AF, no burst, and limited telephoto reach equivalent compared to a full-frame one. It’s strictly “point and pray.”

Sports: Tracking the Race to Capture Peak Moments

Sport shooters crave blazing frame rates, sharp tracking, and low-noise ISO performance.

The Sony holds some competitive weight with continuous AF and 5 fps shooting, though not the definitive sports camera. Its autofocus is reliable for many sports, especially in daylight. Its native ISO 100-25600 range helps in indoor arenas or dusk matches.

The Fujifilm W3 is quite ill-equipped. No continuous shooting, no continuous AF, and limited ISO maxing at 1600 means it struggles with fast-moving subjects or dim conditions.

Street Photography: How Subtle is Subtle Enough?

For street shooters, size, weight, discretion, instant focusing, and ease-of-use matter most.

Here, the Fuji W3’s small size and low profile make it an appealing choice if you value a camera that won’t draw stares. Its 3D feature was aimed at casual capture and novelty, a curious entertainment at parties or vacations.

The Sony A7R II is noticeably larger, noisier, and demands bigger, heavier lenses. It’s not inconspicuous, though some might appreciate the command it affords. For serious street work, I’d still recommend a smaller mirrorless or rangefinder-style body, but if ultimate image quality or versatility is key, the A7R II is compelling.

Macro Photography: Magnify the Little Details

Neither camera is tailored for macro out-of-the-box.

  • Sony A7R II supports countless macro lenses from 30mm to 180mm with outstanding resolution, precision AF, and in-body stabilization - critical for handheld close-ups.

  • Fujifilm W3 lacks dedicated macro modes and has a minimum focus distance of 8cm, which is okay but combined with tiny sensor and slow lens, it produces mediocre macro results.

Night and Astro: Noise, Exposure, and Starry Skies

Shooting in the dark is a test for any camera.

The A7R II’s large, backside-illuminated sensor shines here with excellent high-ISO images up to 25600, real low noise, and wide dynamic range capturing moonlit landscapes or star trails. RAW support allows extensive post-processing rescue.

The W3 maxes out ISO 1600 with a small sensor and no RAW support - resulting in noisy, low-detail shots that are generally unusable in dark environments. For astro geeks, the Sony is the clear pick.

Video Capabilities: From 720p 3D Fun to 4K Pro Broadcast

Video-wise, the cameras stand at opposite ends:

  • The Fuji W3 offers only 720p HD at 24fps in Motion JPEG format (ouch), intended mostly as an appendage to its 3D novelty. No microphone input, no stabilization, and limited settings mean video is a mere curiosity.

  • The Sony A7R II records 4K UHD video internally (3840x2160) with both AVCHD and XAVC S codecs, has mic and headphone jacks for pro audio, and benefits from 5-axis sensor stabilization to smooth handheld footage. It’s a genuine hybrid photo/video tool.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Small Compact vs. Pro Workflow

  • Fujifilm Real 3D W3 uses NP-50 batteries, unknown endurance (likely modest), and accepts SD/SDHC cards with one slot. No wireless connectivity - if you want to get images to your phone, you’ll have to physically connect the camera.

  • Sony A7R II runs NP-FW50 batteries good for around 290 shots (tested under standard CIPA conditions). It supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick storage types and includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image transfer and remote control - a boon for modern workflows.

Lens Choices and Ecosystem

The Fujifilm W3 is a fixed-lens camera with a 35-105mm equivalent zoom and no lens interchangeability. This limits creative potential but is straightforward for casual shooters.

The Sony A7R II, part of the E-mount system, has access to over 120 native lenses covering everything from ultra-wide primes to enormous telephotos, plus tons of high-quality third-party options including popular primes, macro, tilt-shift, and cinema lenses. This ecosystem flexibility empowers creativity and specialization.

Pricing and Value: Where Does Your Money Go?

  • At around $900, the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sits as a niche compact gadget with 3D novelty but compromised image quality and limited creative options.

  • The Sony A7R II, priced closer to $2900, is an investment in a professional imaging system that remains competitive years after its release thanks to flagship-level sensor tech, robust AF, and video functionality.

Visual Confirmation: Sample Shots from Both Cameras

Here you can visually assess how these technical differences translate into pictures. The Sony’s files show remarkable detail, dynamic range, and color fidelity, while the Fujifilm images exhibit softness, limited tonal range, and lower resolution, albeit with the novelty of 3D capture if you have the right display.

Overall Performance and Ratings

Reflecting on key performance metrics such as image quality, AF, usability, and video, the Sony predictably scores near the top for its class, while the Fujifilm W3 lands low due to its dated tech and niche feature set.

Performance by Photography Genre in Context

This breakdown offers a snapshot across shooting styles:

  • Portraits, Landscape, Wildlife, Sports, Night/Astro, Professional Work: Sony A7R II dominates.
  • Street, Travel, Macro: While Sony leads, Fujifilm’s small size gives it some street/travel appeal, albeit at the cost of image quality.

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Fujifilm Real 3D W3

Pros:

  • Compact, lightweight, pocketable
  • Unique 3D photo and video capture
  • Easy to use for casual shooters
  • Affordable compared to pro cameras

Cons:

  • Tiny, dated sensor with limited image quality
  • No RAW support or advanced manual controls
  • No stabilization or weather sealing
  • Lack of wireless connectivity
  • Fixed lens limits creative flexibility
  • Poor low-light and fast action performance

Sony Alpha A7R II

Pros:

  • Outstanding 42MP full-frame image quality
  • Advanced hybrid autofocus with face/eye detection
  • 5-axis in-body stabilization
  • 4K internal video recording with mic/headphone jacks
  • Weather-sealed, durable build
  • Vast lens ecosystem
  • Wireless and remote control functions
  • Suitable for nearly all photography genres

Cons:

  • Significant size and weight compared to compacts
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Battery life could be better for heavy shooting days
  • Pricey for casual users

Who Should Buy Which?

  • Pick the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 if:

    • You’re a casual user or collector intrigued by 3D photo gimmicks and want a light, pocket-friendly shooter for vacations or social sharing.
    • Your budget is tight, and you want a camera mainly for snapshots rather than serious photography.
    • You prefer minimal fuss without complex menus or interchangeable lenses.
  • Pick the Sony A7R II if:

    • You’re a photography enthusiast or professional seeking top-tier image detail, dynamic range, and versatility across genres.
    • You want robust autofocus, excellent low-light ability, and quality 4K video in one package.
    • You intend to expand your gear with a wide range of lenses or use this camera in demanding environmental conditions.
    • You’re budget-conscious but prioritize long-term investment in image quality and system flexibility.

Final Thoughts: A Study in Contrast and Evolution

Comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony A7R II is like comparing a charming classic car to a modern supercar: they exist in completely different worlds. The W3 offers a quirky snapshot experience with its stereoscopic 3D magic, but it’s anchored by limitations typical of early 2010s compact cameras. The Sony A7R II, a giant leap forward with its full-frame sensor and professional feature set, continues to impress years after launch.

If you value image quality and creative potential, the choice is clear - Sony’s A7R II warrants the premium price for serious use. If you crave novelty, light travel ease, or just a fun gadget, the Fujifilm W3 still holds a niche appeal.

No matter which you choose, understanding the strengths and limits of your gear will help you focus on what matters most: creating the images you love.

If you have any questions about these models or want lens recommendations and shooting tips, feel free to ask. After all, camera gear is just a tool - your vision is what truly counts.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony A7R II
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3Sony Alpha A7R II
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Sony
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Sony Alpha A7R II
Type Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-08-17 2015-06-10
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip 3D RP(Real Photo) HD Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 42 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 7974 x 5316
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 399
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.7-4.2 -
Macro focusing distance 8cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,150 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/1000s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 pounds) 625g (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 98
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 26.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3434
Other
Battery life - 290 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $900 $2,913