Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
68 Imaging
75 Features
84 Overall
78
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony A7R
- Successor is Sony A7R III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms From Compact 3D Snaps to Pro-Level Full-Frame: Comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony A7R II
In the world of digital cameras, choice is abundant - but striking the right balance between budget, capability, and purpose isn’t always straightforward. Today we’re putting two very different cameras head to head: the quirky Fujifilm Real 3D W3, a unique compact from 2010 specializing in stereoscopic 3D, and the highly professional Sony Alpha A7R II, a full-frame mirrorless powerhouse renowned since 2015.
I've personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, ranging from pocket-friendly compacts to serious pro-level rigs, evaluating everything from sensor performance to handling under real shooting conditions. Here’s a deep dive into these two models, weaving technical insights with practical real-world stories so you can decide which camera fits your vision - and budget.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Build, and Handling
First impressions matter - and boy, these two don’t just differ in specs, they live in completely different size and handling galaxies.

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is a pocket-sized compact with a plastic body weighing just 230 grams and measuring roughly 124x66x28 mm. If you want a lightweight companion for casual or travel use that won’t cramp your pockets, this camera ticks that box, though with limited physical controls - it’s closer to an advanced point-and-shoot toy.
On the flipside, the Sony A7R II feels like a bona fide professional tool in hand. At 627 grams and a chunkier 127x96x60 mm body built around a magnesium alloy chassis, it offers solid grip and weather-sealing. This heft isn’t just bulk; it translates to a sense of reliability for demanding shoots. The A7R II sports a traditional SLR-style mirrorless shape with clubs for your thumbs in key spots - ideal for extended shooting sessions. The ergonomics suite is built for photographers who want quick access to settings via dials and buttons, not menus.
While the Fujifilm’s ultracompactness is a charm for street photographers or cheapskates alike, the Sony’s substantial build lends itself to professionals or enthusiasts who prioritize durability and direct manual control.
Top Controls and Interface: Familiarity vs. Minimalism

Peeking at the top plates illustrates the design philosophies: The Sony A7R II boasts an array of control dials - mode dial, exposure compensation, shutter speed, and more - frameable for tactile changes on the fly. It’s the camera’s cockpit.
Conversely, the W3’s controls are sparse, mostly menu-driven with aperture priority being the only semi-manual exposure mode. Sure, it simplifies operation but at the cost of creative flexibility. For those used to adjusting shutter speeds or ISO instinctively, the W3 might feel restrictive.
Sensors and Image Quality: A Leap from 10MP CCD to 42MP Full-Frame CMOS
Now we get to the heart of imaging - the sensor. The difference here is a chasm.

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sports a small 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55mm with a 10MP resolution. Back in 2010, this sensor was typical for compacts but looks quite dated by modern standards. Its small size results in limited light capture, which affects dynamic range, low-light ability, and detail resolution. The included anti-alias filter softens images, which helps avoid moiré but further reduces sharpness.
On the other hand, the Sony A7R II packs a massive full-frame 35.9 x 24 mm backside-illuminated CMOS sensor with an imposing 42.4MP count, and no anti-alias filter for razor-sharp resolutions. With sensor tech improvements including a back-illuminated design to enhance light gathering, it achieves exceptional dynamic range (~14 stops measured), excellent color depth (26 bits on DxOmark), and stunning high ISO performance (ISO 100-25600 native, expandable to 102400).
To put it plainly: the Sony A7R II crushes the W3 in image quality, especially in demanding scenes with shadows and highlights or low-light situations. But remember, this sophistication comes with a much heftier price tag.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Compose and Review in Your Preferred Way

The W3 has a single fixed 3.5-inch LCD screen with a modest resolution of 1150k dots, adequate for reviewing 3D and 2D shots. It lacks touchscreen functionality or articulating mechanics, limiting versatility for tricky angles or vlogging. No electronic viewfinder (EVF) means composing entirely via the rear screen - it works fine for casual use but can be frustrating in bright sunlight.
Sony gives you a 3.0-inch tilting LCD with 1,229k dots and a much-needed high-resolution EVF boasting 2,359k dots and 100% coverage, giving you a bright, detailed preview in variable lighting - a must-have for professionals working outdoors. Although no touch sensitivity here, the joystick and buttons streamline menu navigation.
The Sony interface caters to efficiency under pressure, while Fujifilm keeps it simple but somewhat dated.
Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: From Basic Contrast AF to 399-Point Hybrid AF
The Real 3D W3 uses a basic contrast detection autofocus system and offers only single AF mode with center-weighted AF area selection. It does not support face or eye detection, continuous autofocus, or tracking. So for action, animals, or unpredictable subjects, expect some hunting or slow focus.
By contrast, the Sony A7R II revolutionized autofocus by combining 399 phase-detection points covering 45% of the frame, assisted by 25 contrast detection points. It supports face detection, tracking, selective AF areas, continuous AF, and eye AF for precise portraits. The body’s AF system locks quickly and tracks erratic subjects with impressive accuracy - a boon for wildlife and sports shooters.
Shooting speeds show similar disparity: The W3 lacks burst mode, whereas the A7R II can shoot steady 5 fps continuous bursts at full resolution, enough for many sports applications.
Exploring Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Fits
Portraits: Bokeh Beauty or Basic Snapshots?
If you’re hunting for creamy bokeh, precise eye detection, and skin tone fidelity, the Sony A7R II again shines. Paired with Sony’s vast E-mount lenses including fast primes and portrait favorites (like the 85mm f/1.8), this setup delivers best-in-class portrait images with exquisite background separation and outstanding tonal rendition. The eye-af feature means nearly effortless focus on subjects’ eyes - a dream for wedding or editorial photographers.
The Fujifilm W3, with its small sensor and fixed 35-105mm (equivalent to 200-600mm crop factor!) lens with a max aperture of f/3.7-4.2, simply cannot isolate subjects well. The small sensor means deep depth of field even at longest zoom, resulting in flat portraits with limited bokeh. Plus, the lack of autofocus face/eye detection limits sharp portrait capture precision.
Landscape: Big Sensor, Big Stamina, or Minimalist Snap
Capturing expanses with vivid details, color gradations, and robust dynamic range is where sensor size and image quality count most.
The Sony A7R II’s full-frame sensor and 42MP resolution allow enormous 8000+ pixel wide files that crop or print huge while retaining sharpness. Its 14 stops of DR captures subtle cloud gradients and shadow detail. Weather sealing means you can take it rain or shine. Battery life (approx 290 shots per charge) is respectable for serious outdoor use.
The Fuji W3’s little sensor limits both DR and ultimate resolution, capping image quality when printing large or cropping. Weather sealing isn’t present, and the camera’s flash range is only 3.6 meters - limiting usefulness in natural light. For casual travel landscapes on sunny days, it’s fine, but it won’t deliver gallery-grade results.
Wildlife: Focus and Speed to Catch the Action
Wildlife demands lightning-fast and accurate autofocus, high ISO for low light, and a broad native telephoto range.
Here the Sony A7R II excels with its hybrid AF system’s tracking prowess and support for pro-level telephoto lenses in the E-mount ecosystem - think 400mm primes with image stabilization. The 5-axis sensor-based stabilization reduces blur when handholding big zooms. Burst shooting at 5 fps may frustrate extreme sports photographers but is solid for many wildlife scenarios.
The Fuji W3 has none of this - fixed-lens, slow contrast AF, no burst, and limited telephoto reach equivalent compared to a full-frame one. It’s strictly “point and pray.”
Sports: Tracking the Race to Capture Peak Moments
Sport shooters crave blazing frame rates, sharp tracking, and low-noise ISO performance.
The Sony holds some competitive weight with continuous AF and 5 fps shooting, though not the definitive sports camera. Its autofocus is reliable for many sports, especially in daylight. Its native ISO 100-25600 range helps in indoor arenas or dusk matches.
The Fujifilm W3 is quite ill-equipped. No continuous shooting, no continuous AF, and limited ISO maxing at 1600 means it struggles with fast-moving subjects or dim conditions.
Street Photography: How Subtle is Subtle Enough?
For street shooters, size, weight, discretion, instant focusing, and ease-of-use matter most.
Here, the Fuji W3’s small size and low profile make it an appealing choice if you value a camera that won’t draw stares. Its 3D feature was aimed at casual capture and novelty, a curious entertainment at parties or vacations.
The Sony A7R II is noticeably larger, noisier, and demands bigger, heavier lenses. It’s not inconspicuous, though some might appreciate the command it affords. For serious street work, I’d still recommend a smaller mirrorless or rangefinder-style body, but if ultimate image quality or versatility is key, the A7R II is compelling.
Macro Photography: Magnify the Little Details
Neither camera is tailored for macro out-of-the-box.
-
Sony A7R II supports countless macro lenses from 30mm to 180mm with outstanding resolution, precision AF, and in-body stabilization - critical for handheld close-ups.
-
Fujifilm W3 lacks dedicated macro modes and has a minimum focus distance of 8cm, which is okay but combined with tiny sensor and slow lens, it produces mediocre macro results.
Night and Astro: Noise, Exposure, and Starry Skies
Shooting in the dark is a test for any camera.
The A7R II’s large, backside-illuminated sensor shines here with excellent high-ISO images up to 25600, real low noise, and wide dynamic range capturing moonlit landscapes or star trails. RAW support allows extensive post-processing rescue.
The W3 maxes out ISO 1600 with a small sensor and no RAW support - resulting in noisy, low-detail shots that are generally unusable in dark environments. For astro geeks, the Sony is the clear pick.
Video Capabilities: From 720p 3D Fun to 4K Pro Broadcast
Video-wise, the cameras stand at opposite ends:
-
The Fuji W3 offers only 720p HD at 24fps in Motion JPEG format (ouch), intended mostly as an appendage to its 3D novelty. No microphone input, no stabilization, and limited settings mean video is a mere curiosity.
-
The Sony A7R II records 4K UHD video internally (3840x2160) with both AVCHD and XAVC S codecs, has mic and headphone jacks for pro audio, and benefits from 5-axis sensor stabilization to smooth handheld footage. It’s a genuine hybrid photo/video tool.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Small Compact vs. Pro Workflow
-
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 uses NP-50 batteries, unknown endurance (likely modest), and accepts SD/SDHC cards with one slot. No wireless connectivity - if you want to get images to your phone, you’ll have to physically connect the camera.
-
Sony A7R II runs NP-FW50 batteries good for around 290 shots (tested under standard CIPA conditions). It supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick storage types and includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image transfer and remote control - a boon for modern workflows.
Lens Choices and Ecosystem
The Fujifilm W3 is a fixed-lens camera with a 35-105mm equivalent zoom and no lens interchangeability. This limits creative potential but is straightforward for casual shooters.
The Sony A7R II, part of the E-mount system, has access to over 120 native lenses covering everything from ultra-wide primes to enormous telephotos, plus tons of high-quality third-party options including popular primes, macro, tilt-shift, and cinema lenses. This ecosystem flexibility empowers creativity and specialization.
Pricing and Value: Where Does Your Money Go?
-
At around $900, the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sits as a niche compact gadget with 3D novelty but compromised image quality and limited creative options.
-
The Sony A7R II, priced closer to $2900, is an investment in a professional imaging system that remains competitive years after its release thanks to flagship-level sensor tech, robust AF, and video functionality.
Visual Confirmation: Sample Shots from Both Cameras
Here you can visually assess how these technical differences translate into pictures. The Sony’s files show remarkable detail, dynamic range, and color fidelity, while the Fujifilm images exhibit softness, limited tonal range, and lower resolution, albeit with the novelty of 3D capture if you have the right display.
Overall Performance and Ratings
Reflecting on key performance metrics such as image quality, AF, usability, and video, the Sony predictably scores near the top for its class, while the Fujifilm W3 lands low due to its dated tech and niche feature set.
Performance by Photography Genre in Context
This breakdown offers a snapshot across shooting styles:
- Portraits, Landscape, Wildlife, Sports, Night/Astro, Professional Work: Sony A7R II dominates.
- Street, Travel, Macro: While Sony leads, Fujifilm’s small size gives it some street/travel appeal, albeit at the cost of image quality.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Fujifilm Real 3D W3
Pros:
- Compact, lightweight, pocketable
- Unique 3D photo and video capture
- Easy to use for casual shooters
- Affordable compared to pro cameras
Cons:
- Tiny, dated sensor with limited image quality
- No RAW support or advanced manual controls
- No stabilization or weather sealing
- Lack of wireless connectivity
- Fixed lens limits creative flexibility
- Poor low-light and fast action performance
Sony Alpha A7R II
Pros:
- Outstanding 42MP full-frame image quality
- Advanced hybrid autofocus with face/eye detection
- 5-axis in-body stabilization
- 4K internal video recording with mic/headphone jacks
- Weather-sealed, durable build
- Vast lens ecosystem
- Wireless and remote control functions
- Suitable for nearly all photography genres
Cons:
- Significant size and weight compared to compacts
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Battery life could be better for heavy shooting days
- Pricey for casual users
Who Should Buy Which?
-
Pick the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 if:
- You’re a casual user or collector intrigued by 3D photo gimmicks and want a light, pocket-friendly shooter for vacations or social sharing.
- Your budget is tight, and you want a camera mainly for snapshots rather than serious photography.
- You prefer minimal fuss without complex menus or interchangeable lenses.
-
Pick the Sony A7R II if:
- You’re a photography enthusiast or professional seeking top-tier image detail, dynamic range, and versatility across genres.
- You want robust autofocus, excellent low-light ability, and quality 4K video in one package.
- You intend to expand your gear with a wide range of lenses or use this camera in demanding environmental conditions.
- You’re budget-conscious but prioritize long-term investment in image quality and system flexibility.
Final Thoughts: A Study in Contrast and Evolution
Comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Sony A7R II is like comparing a charming classic car to a modern supercar: they exist in completely different worlds. The W3 offers a quirky snapshot experience with its stereoscopic 3D magic, but it’s anchored by limitations typical of early 2010s compact cameras. The Sony A7R II, a giant leap forward with its full-frame sensor and professional feature set, continues to impress years after launch.
If you value image quality and creative potential, the choice is clear - Sony’s A7R II warrants the premium price for serious use. If you crave novelty, light travel ease, or just a fun gadget, the Fujifilm W3 still holds a niche appeal.
No matter which you choose, understanding the strengths and limits of your gear will help you focus on what matters most: creating the images you love.
If you have any questions about these models or want lens recommendations and shooting tips, feel free to ask. After all, camera gear is just a tool - your vision is what truly counts.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Sony A7R II Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sony Alpha A7R II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Sony Alpha A7R II |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2015-06-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7974 x 5316 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 399 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 98 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3434 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $900 | $2,913 |