Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225
56 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Display
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Announced August 2000
- Renewed by Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and TL225 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S1 Pro was revealed 10 years earlier than the TL225 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro grades vs the TL225 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Samsung TL225
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
| TL225 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | August 2000 | More recent by 109 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 200k | Sharper display (+952k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Samsung TL225
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S1 Pro features physical measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro against the TL225.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and TL225 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and TL225.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S1 Pro with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung TL225 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S1 Pro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2000-08-08 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23 x 15.5mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 356.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3040 x 2016 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 320 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 309 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 200k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/125s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 820g (1.81 lb) | 187g (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $488 |