Fujifilm S4500 vs Ricoh CX2
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm S4500 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009

Fujifilm FinePix S4500 vs. Ricoh CX2: A Detailed Comparison for Every Photography Journey
When considering small sensor superzoom cameras, the Fujifilm FinePix S4500 and Ricoh CX2 stand out with distinct strengths and unique design philosophies. Both cater to enthusiasts looking for versatility and decent image quality on a budget. But which one is the better fit for your photographic adventures? Drawing from extensive hands-on experience and rigorous testing, we’ll break down these cameras across core use cases, technical specs, and real-world performance - helping you make an informed choice.
Getting Acquainted: Physical Design and Ergonomics
The first impression often starts with how a camera feels in your hands. Ergonomics influence comfort, ease of use, and ultimately how much you enjoy shooting.
- Fujifilm S4500: This is a bridge camera with an SLR-like body. Its size and traditional grip offer a familiar feel for DSLR shooters or enthusiasts stepping up from compacts.
- Ricoh CX2: With its compact, pocket-friendly body, the CX2 is much smaller and lighter. Ideal if portability is a priority.
Looking at the dimensions:
Feature | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 118 x 81 x 100 | 102 x 58 x 29 |
Weight | 543 g (with batteries) | 185 g |
Body Type | Bridge, SLR-like | Compact |
Grip | Pronounced hand grip | Slim, minimal grip |
Controls | Physical dials and buttons | Minimalist, fewer controls |
The S4500’s larger body allows for better stability, especially during telephoto shots, while the CX2’s compactness makes it highly pocketable for travel and street photography.
Top-View and Handling: Control Layout Overview
The way controls are arranged impacts speed and accuracy of operation, especially in fast-paced shooting environments.
- The Fujifilm S4500 provides a more elaborate control scheme including dedicated zoom toggle, mode dial with manual options, and easy access to exposure compensation. This supports more advanced shooting approaches.
- The Ricoh CX2, geared towards simplicity, features fewer physical controls, relying heavily on menu navigation. It omits manual exposure modes entirely, making it less flexible for creative control.
For photographers comfortable with manual adjustments and faster physical access to settings, Fujifilm’s layout benefits the workflow. Conversely, CX2 is better suited for straightforward point-and-shoot scenarios.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
At the core, both cameras share the same sensor size: 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm), which is considered small by modern standards. But one key difference lies in the sensor technology and resolution.
Aspect | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
Resolution | 14 MP (4288x3216 px) | 9 MP (3456x2592 px) |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min Native ISO | 64 | 80 |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | No |
Why Sensor Type and Resolution Matter
CCD sensors, like Fujifilm’s, were traditionally preferred for their image quality and color depth but consume more power and are slower. CMOS sensors (in Ricoh CX2) tend to have better noise handling and lower power consumption but can vary in quality depending on implementation and processing.
- The Fujifilm’s 14MP CCD sensor typically delivers higher resolution images with better detail capture in good light.
- The Ricoh’s 9MP CMOS sensor, combined with Smooth Imaging Engine IV, offers good color reproduction and potentially better noise control, especially at mid-range ISO levels.
From real-world tests, Fujifilm consistently produces sharper images with more detailed textures, beneficial for print or crops. However, Ricoh’s sensor paired with its processor provides cleaner images with less noise in typical snapshots.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing Your Shot
Composition tools heavily influence usability and shooting comfort.
Feature | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Screen Size | 3.0" | 3.0" |
Resolution (pixels) | 230k | 920k |
Screen Type | TFT LCD, Fixed | Fixed, unspecified tech |
Viewfinder | Electronic (EVF) | None |
Viewfinder Coverage | 97% | N/A |
The Ricoh CX2’s noticeably higher resolution LCD provides a crisp preview, making manual focusing and review easier, despite the lack of an EVF. Conversely, the Fujifilm includes an electronic viewfinder, a helpful feature when shooting in bright daylight or for more precise framing.
From hands-on experience, EVFs in this class often lag or provide limited resolution, but it still can be preferable for stability and framing accuracy in varying lighting.
Versatility in Lens and Zoom Range: Field Adaptability
Given that both cameras feature fixed lenses, their zoom capabilities largely define versatility.
Feature | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm equiv) | 24-720 mm (30x) | 28-300 mm (10.7x) |
Max Aperture Range | F3.1–5.9 | F3.5–5.6 |
Macro Focus Distance | 2 cm | 1 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift IS | Sensor-shift IS |
The S4500’s vast 30x zoom range covers ultra-wide to super-telephoto, making it a powerful all-in-one option, especially when long reach is needed - great for wildlife and sports photography. The Ricoh CX2’s 10.7x zoom gives ample coverage for travel and street photography but won’t rival the reach of the Fujifilm.
Macro shooting benefits slightly more from Ricoh’s minimum focus distance of 1cm compared to 2cm on the S4500, offering closer close-ups.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment
Fast and accurate autofocus (AF) and burst shooting are critical, particularly for action, wildlife, and street photography.
Aspect | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Focus System | Contrast detection with face detection | Contrast detection |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking (face detection) | Single only |
Number of Focus Points | Not specified | Not specified |
Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | No continuous shooting |
While both cameras use contrast-detection AF, the Fujifilm S4500 benefits from face detection and continuous AF modes, enabling better subject tracking. Its burst rate is limited to 1 frame per second - modest compared to modern standards but serviceable for slower action.
The Ricoh CX2 lags here, offering only single AF without tracking or continuous shooting capability, making it less suited for fast-moving subjects.
Expanding the Photography Spectrum: Use Case Reviews
Photography is multifaceted. Let’s break down how these cameras perform across popular disciplines.
Portrait Photography
- Skin Tones & Colors: The Fujifilm’s CCD sensor tends to render warmer, pleasing skin tones, aided by customizable white balance. Ricoh’s CMOS sensor captures accurate color but can sometimes be cooler in tone.
- Bokeh and Depth of Field: Both cameras have small sensors limiting shallow depth-of-field effects; however, Fujifilm’s wider 24mm wide angle and longer telephoto reach can produce more pronounced background separation.
- Eye Detection & Focus: Fujifilm’s face detection autofocus gives it an edge in locking focus on faces for sharper portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Resolution & Detail: Fujifilm’s higher 14MP sensor captures more detail, important for large prints or cropping.
- Dynamic Range: Neither camera excels here due to sensor size and lack of RAW support, but Ricoh’s CMOS technology can preserve shadows better.
- Weather Sealing: Neither model offers environmental sealing, limiting outdoor ruggedness.
Wildlife Photography
- Telephoto Performance: Fujifilm’s 720mm equivalent zoom is a standout feature for wildlife, easily surpassing Ricoh’s 300mm max zoom.
- Autofocus Speed: Fujifilm’s continuous AF and tracking assist in following animals, although only at 1 fps burst rate.
- Ergonomics: The larger body of the S4500 aids stability during long focal length shooting.
Sports Photography
- Tracking Accuracy: Limited on both; Ricoh CX2 lacks tracking AF.
- Frame Rates: Both cameras are slow by modern standards; Fujifilm’s 1 fps burst can suffice for slower sports.
- Low Light: Max ISO 1600 is restrictive but Fujifilm’s manual exposure modes can help optimize shutter/aperture combos.
Street Photography
- Portability & Discretion: CX2 shines here due to its compact size and lighter weight.
- Low Light Performance: Both cameras have limited high ISO ability; CX2’s CMOS sensor and higher resolution screen help composing in dim conditions.
- Rapid Access to Controls: Fujifilm’s manual controls may slow quick street shooting.
Macro Photography
- Magnification & Close-focus: Ricoh CX2’s 1cm minimum focus distance yields more detailed macro shots.
- Focusing Precision: Both cameras rely on contrast-detection AF, but Ricoh’s higher resolution screen aids accurate manual focus.
- Stabilization: Both feature sensor-shift IS helpful for handheld macros.
Night & Astro Photography
- High ISO Noise: Both cameras are challenged here with noise at ISO 1600.
- Exposure Modes: Fujifilm offers shutter and aperture priority modes to tweak exposure manually.
- Long Exposure Support: Both cameras allow up to 8-second shutter speeds but lack bulb mode.
- Raw Support: Absent in both, limiting post-processing flexibility.
Video Capabilities
Video Feature | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1280x720 (30 fps) | 640x480 (30 fps) |
Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift IS | Sensor-shift IS |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Headphone Port | No | No |
Fujifilm’s HD video at 720p provides better quality and versatility. Ricoh’s video is more basic with VGA resolution only, making it less suitable for high-quality video projects.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Points
Feature | Fujifilm S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | 4x AA batteries | Proprietary rechargeable (DB-70) |
Battery Life (shots) | ~300 | Not specified |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC + Internal |
Wireless Connectivity | None | None |
HDMI Output | Yes | No |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Using standard AA batteries in the Fujifilm model offers convenience, especially when traveling without access to charging. The dedicated rechargeable battery of the CX2 is lighter but requires charging gear.
HDMI output on the S4500 allows easy connection to external displays, a plus for instant image review during shoots.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers environmental sealing or ruggedized build features. The Fujifilm’s larger body tends to feel more robust, while the Ricoh is slim and functional but less heavy-duty.
Price and Value Assessment
Camera | Approximate Price* | Comments |
---|---|---|
Fujifilm S4500 | $230 | Lower price, larger zoom, manual control |
Ricoh CX2 | $340 | Higher price, compact size, better LCD |
*Prices at time of review; vary by region and seller.
The Fujifilm offers more features at a lower price, prioritizing range and manual control. Ricoh asks a premium for compactness and image processor refinement but lacks advanced shooting flexibility.
Visual Samples: Image Quality in Practice
To truly grasp differences, seeing example shots is crucial. Here is a gallery comparing images from both cameras under various conditions:
Notice how Fujifilm’s photos render more fine detail and slightly warmer tones, especially in daylight. Ricoh’s images are cleaner at mid ISO but sometimes less sharp.
Overall Performance Scorecard
Considering sensor, controls, zoom, and other factors, here are consolidated performance ratings:
Specialized Photography Genres Performance
Breaking down suitability for different genres:
Who Should Choose Which?
-
Choose Fujifilm FinePix S4500 if:
- You need extensive zoom reach (up to 720mm) for wildlife or sports.
- Manual exposure and physical controls are important to your creative process.
- You prefer an electronic viewfinder for stable composition.
- You want better video quality at 720p HD.
- You prefer AA batteries for convenience.
-
Choose Ricoh CX2 if:
- Portability and low weight are your top priorities - ideal for street and travel photography.
- You prefer a higher resolution rear LCD for framing and image review.
- Macro photography with close focusing (1cm) is a focus.
- You want a simple interface with fewer manual control distractions.
- Compactness and ease of carry trump advanced zoom or manual settings.
Final Thoughts: Putting It into Perspective
Both the Fujifilm FinePix S4500 and Ricoh CX2 demonstrate strengths reflective of their design priorities. The Fujifilm is a versatile bridge camera with strong zoom and manual options suitable for enthusiasts wanting more control and creative flexibility. The Ricoh CX2, with its compactness and leaner control scheme, is more suited for casual shooting where ease and portability matter most.
Neither camera is cutting-edge by today’s standards, lacking RAW support and advanced autofocus. However, they remain capable companions for beginners stepping into superzoom territory or budget-conscious photographers seeking specialized features.
When possible, hands-on experience is invaluable – check out these cameras in-store or borrow from friends to feel which suits your style. Don’t forget to pair your choice with lenses and accessories that align with your photography goals.
Explore and Create
Photography is a personal journey - start with a camera that excites you to explore creativity and sharpen your skills. Whether it’s the expansive reach of the Fujifilm FinePix S4500 or the nimble convenience of the Ricoh CX2, these cameras can open doors to new photographic experiences.
Happy shooting - your next great photo is just a click away!
Fujifilm S4500 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2009-08-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 543 grams (1.20 lbs) | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $230 | $341 |