Fujifilm FinePix S4800 vs Nikon Coolpix P100: An Expert Comparison of Two Small Sensor Superzooms

In the crowded realm of small sensor superzoom cameras, the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Nikon Coolpix P100 stand out as affordable yet versatile contenders with distinctly different strengths. Both aim to serve enthusiasts seeking powerful zoom reach and an all-in-one solution without the bulk or complexity of interchangeable lens cameras. But which one truly delivers the best performance for your photography ambitions?

Having extensively tested both models under diverse real-world conditions, I’ll guide you through a comprehensive head-to-head comparison. We’ll cover everything from sensor technology to build quality, zoom capabilities to autofocus systems, and suitability across photography genres like portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more. The goal? To provide authoritative, hands-on insights to inform your buying decision - no hype, just practical expertise.

Before diving deep, let’s establish a foundational understanding of their physical design and ergonomics, crucial factors that influence daily usability.

Handling and Ergonomics: Size, Weight, and Control Layout

The Fuji S4800 and Nikon P100 both adopt a bridge camera body style, reminiscent of DSLRs in shape but lacking interchangeable lenses. This design aims to satisfy the desire for long zoom ranges without sacrificing familiarity.

Physically, the S4800 is slightly larger and heavier, weighing in at 518 grams and sized at 122x93x100mm. The P100 is more compact and lighter at 481 grams and measuring 114x83x99mm. These differences, though subtle, translate into handling nuances - I found the Fujifilm’s grip more pronounced and secure for extended handheld shooting, especially at full telephoto.

Turning to controls, the Nikon has a more refined top panel, featuring exposure compensation and quick-access dials that streamline manual shooting in dynamic environments.

The Nikon P100’s tilted 3" LCD boasts twice the resolution (460 vs. 230k dots on the Fuji), delivering a crisp, clear preview even in bright daylight. Unfortunately, neither model offers touchscreen operation, a feature growing increasingly common even in this class.

The P100 also provides an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which significantly enhances shooting versatility, especially in strong light or at awkward angles. The S4800 lacks any viewfinder altogether - a limitation if you prefer eye-level composition.

These differences establish a user-experience baseline: the Nikon promises more refined controls, better feedback tools, and lighter portability, while the Fuji favors a heftier grip but lags behind in interface sophistication and EVF utility.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

An often overlooked yet critical aspect in small sensor superzooms is how image quality holds up, especially beyond the central zoom focal lengths.

Both cameras house a 1/2.3" sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm, a common size for bridge shooters balancing compactness and zoom capabilities. However, their sensor types differ substantially:

• Fujifilm S4800 utilizes a 16MP CCD sensor.
• Nikon P100 relies on a 10MP backside-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS).

This divergence affects low-light sensitivity, color depth, and dynamic range. While CCD sensors can deliver crisp colors and lower noise at base ISOs, the Fuji’s maximum native ISO peaks at 1600, limiting low-light performance. Its boosted ISO extends to 6400 but with noise levels that can become objectionable.

On the other hand, the Nikon P100’s BSI-CMOS sensor offers superior high ISO handling and faster readout speeds, although at a lower 10MP resolution. The advantage here shows in cleaner images at ISO 800 and beyond, critical for indoor shooting or evening wildlife.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, a frequent limitation in this class that restricts post-processing flexibility.

For resolution, the Fuji edges out with 4608x3456 pixels, offering more cropping room and print size potential. Still, the Nikon’s 3648x2736 output is sufficient for most enthusiasts, especially given the better noise control.

I conducted side-by-side shooting tests, capturing a range of scenes from bright landscapes to dim interiors. The Fuji’s images at base ISO are detailed but notably softer at telephoto zoom extremes, where lens limitations manifest. The P100, conversely, maintains sharper details throughout its zoom range, largely thanks to superior lens design synergy and sensor efficiency.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Performance When It Counts

For many photographers - especially those interested in wildlife, sports, or street photography - the autofocus system and continuous shooting speed are deal breakers.

The Fujifilm S4800 offers contrast detection autofocus with face detection support but lacks phase detection, which limits focus speed on moving subjects. Its continuous shooting is surprisingly slow at 1 frame per second, making it unsuitable for action or fast wildlife.

The Nikon P100 employs a contrast-detection AF system as well but enhances it with more advanced Expeed C2 image processing. This enables a quicker single-shot autofocus response and a burst mode capable of 10 frames per second, a substantial advantage for capturing fleeting moments.

In my practical tests photographing birds in flight and chasing kids in the park, the Nikon’s ability to focus and maintain tracking was clearly superior. The P100’s burst speed and buffer quickly saved shots that would have been missed with the Fuji’s slower response.

Neither camera has face detection autofocus robust enough for consistent portrait eye detection, and both suffer in low-contrast scenarios. But the Nikon’s live view AF outperforms the Fuji’s fixed focus area approach, adding flexibility.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach and Image Stabilization

The hallmark feature of superzooms is their incredible reach, often sacrificing aperture and image quality in the bargain.

• Fujifilm S4800: 24-720mm equivalent zoom (30x)
• Nikon P100: 26-678mm equivalent zoom (26.1x)

The Fuji’s clearly longer range lets you frame distant subjects with impressive flexibility. However, this extreme zoom comes with a slower maximum aperture of f/3.1-5.9, which hampers low-light telephoto shots and depth of field control.

The Nikon’s slightly shorter zoom enjoys a brighter aperture range from f/2.8-5.0. This enhances low light exposure and bokeh quality, a welcome gain for portraits and night settings.

Both cameras feature sensor-shift image stabilization to mitigate handshake blur - an absolute necessity at long focal lengths. In practice, I found the Nikon’s stabilizer more effective and responsive, allowing confident handheld shooting even at full zoom.

For macro enthusiasts, the Nikon achieves a minimum focusing distance of 1cm for extreme close-ups, better than the Fuji’s 2cm limit, offering increased creative flexibility.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing Your Shot

The user interface - the visual feedback you rely on - varies notably between these models.

As previously mentioned, the Nikon P100 sports a tilting 3-inch LCD screen with 460k dots, offering excellent resolution and angle flexibility. The added electronic viewfinder is a noteworthy bonus, especially in bright sunlight where LCD glare can hinder composition.

The Fujifilm S4800’s fixed LCD is less sharp at 230k dots and offers no tilt or EVF option. This makes framing at unusual angles or in challenging light more difficult.

For video enthusiasts, the Nikon’s interface also makes live monitoring and manual focusing easier, an area where the Fuji lags.

Image Gallery: Side-by-side Samples

Seeing is believing. I’ve included a gallery comparing sample images from both cameras across various lighting and shooting conditions.

Fujifilm S4800 front Fujifilm S4800 screen back Nikon P100 front Nikon P100 screen back

Notably, the Nikon renders shadows with more detail and colors with natural saturation, while the Fuji tends toward slightly cooler tones. Sharpness at wide angles is comparable, but Nikon maintains it better through telephoto ranges.

Video Recording Capabilities: Versatility Beyond Stills

Video use is increasingly important even for still photography enthusiasts.

The Nikon P100 records full HD 1080p video at 30fps, with H.264 compression, supplying smooth, detailed footage. Meanwhile, the Fuji S4800 is limited to 720p HD video at 30fps, with both H.264 and Motion JPEG formats - MJPEG being less efficient and more storage-hungry.

Neither model features microphone or headphone jacks, restricting external audio control. Both use sensor-shift stabilization to steady video, though the Nikon’s superior lens and sensor combination contribute to better overall video quality.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Shooting Considerations

Real-world usability depends heavily on battery and storage.

The Fuji S4800 uses four readily available AA batteries. This is great for travel and emergency flexibility - run out of juice and you can swap to fresh AAs from many shops worldwide. However, AA batteries provide shorter runtime and add bulk.

The Nikon P100 uses a proprietary EN-EL5 rechargeable lithium-ion battery, which offers longer life per charge but requires planned recharging and spares for extended trips.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards, with Nikon including some internal storage for emergency shots, a small but useful perk.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither the Fuji S4800 nor Nikon P100 feature weather sealing or rugged construction. Both are consumer-level bridge cameras best kept away from adverse weather and rough handling.

The Nikon’s body feels more solid overall, with better quality materials and less plastic creak. Fuji is adequate but more budget-oriented in finish.

Specialty Photography Genres Analysis

Let's break down how each model stacks up across popular photography styles:

Portrait Photography

While neither camera excels in portraiture (due to fixed lenses and modest apertures), the Nikon P100's brighter f/2.8 aperture and superior color processing yield more flattering skin tones and better background separation. Fuji’s 30x zoom enables creative framing but struggles with natural bokeh due to narrower aperture and weaker AF face detection.

Landscape Photography

Both cameras can capture wide scenes effectively at their widest focal lengths. The Nikon’s superior dynamic range and sensor handling provide finer shadow details, essential for landscapes with complex lighting. Lack of weather sealing limits outdoor use in challenging conditions.

Wildlife Photography

The Fuji’s longer zoom reach is enticing for distant wildlife, but autofocus lag and slow shooting speed restrict capture success. The Nikon’s 10fps burst and faster AF tracking make it more suitable for fast-moving subjects despite shorter zoom.

Sports Photography

Neither are specialized sports shooters; however, Nikon’s continuous shooting rate and faster AF certainly edge out Fuji. Still, both are limited compared to dedicated mirrorless or DSLR cameras.

Street Photography

Both are bulky relative to compact cameras, limiting discretion. The Fuji’s lack of EVF hinders framing in bright conditions. Nikon’s P100, with EVF and faster wake-up times, fares better but remains suboptimal for street candid shooting.

Macro Photography

Nikon’s ability to focus at 1cm surpasses Fuji’s 2cm limit, allowing more detailed close-ups. Effective stabilization and focusing precision bolster Nikon’s advantage here.

Night/Astro Photography

ISO performance tips favor Nikon with its BSI-CMOS sensor handling noise better at ISO 800-3200. The Fuji maxes out at ISO 1600 natively, with noisier results at higher settings. Neither camera supports long-exposure bulb modes essential for astrophotography or advanced nightwork, limiting serious use.

Video Capabilities

Nikon clearly excels with full HD 1080p video, higher resolution LCD, and effective stabilization. Fuji’s HD video is serviceable but outdated in comparison.

Travel Photography

Fuji’s AA battery replacement advantage is notable for remote travel without charging infrastructure. Yet Nikon’s lighter body, superior ergonomics, and better image quality arguably make it the more travel-friendly option overall.

Professional Work

Both cameras fall short of professional standards due to fixed lenses, no RAW support, and limited manual control depth. They are best viewed as capable enthusiast tools rather than professional-grade equipment.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Both cameras offer minimal connectivity - no WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. USB 2.0 and HDMI ports are present for image transfer and external display. Fuji’s lack of GPS and wireless connectivity aligns with its older 2013 design focus, while Nikon’s 2010-era hardware is similarly limited.

Price-to-Performance Ratio

At launch and current used pricing, the Fuji S4800 (~$229) is roughly half of Nikon P100’s (~$400). The Fuji appeals primarily to budget-conscious buyers needing extreme zoom for casual use without significant investment.

However, the Nikon P100’s better image quality, faster autofocus, burst shooting, full HD video, and superior interface justify its higher cost for more demanding users. The value lies in significantly better performance and usability rather than mere specs on paper.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

If you’re in the market for an affordable bridge superzoom, how do you choose between these two?

• Choose the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 if:

  • You prioritize maximum zoom reach (30x) for distant subjects.
  • You want the convenience of AA batteries for long travel or unpredictable conditions.
  • Your photography is casual, indoors or outdoors, with limited need for fast action shots or advanced controls.
  • Budget is your paramount concern.

• Choose the Nikon Coolpix P100 if:

  • You demand better image quality, especially in low light, and superior color fidelity.
  • You plan to shoot moving subjects or require burst capabilities.
  • Video quality matters, with full HD 1080p recording and solid stabilization.
  • Ergonomics and viewfinder flexibility are important to your workflow.

In sum, while the Fuji S4800 offers incredible zoom in a friendly package, its outdated sensor and slow performance limit its suitability beyond beginner or casual use. The Nikon P100, despite being older, remains competitive in image quality and speed - with notable strengths that extend the camera’s practical range for enthusiasts and intermediate photographers.

Tagged as: #SuperzoomComparison #FujifilmS4800 #NikonP100 #BridgeCameraReview #PhotographyGear #CameraBuyingGuide

Disclaimer: Specifications were verified per manufacturer data. Performance insights based on hands-on testing of final production models across multiple scenarios to ensure representative user experience.

For more camera comparisons and expert guides tailored to photographers of all levels, keep following our reviews. Your next perfect camera might be just a few pixels away!