Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Successor is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FP2, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-1 was released 7 years earlier than the FP2 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-1 matches up versus the FP2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Panasonic FP2
E-1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-1
FP2 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | November 2003 | More modern by 74 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FP2
E-1 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 has got exterior measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FP2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-1 and the FP2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and FP2 is 59 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and FP2.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-1 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FP2 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Category | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735g (1.62 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,700 | $80 |