Fujifilm S4800 vs Panasonic FZ40
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38


68 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm S4800 vs Panasonic FZ40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 494g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ45

Fujifilm FinePix S4800 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40: A Hands-On Comparison for Budget Superzoom Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera in the crowded bridge camera category can be a daunting task, especially when budgets are tight but expectations remain high. Today, we’re diving deep into two small sensor superzoom contenders from the earlier 2010s that remain relevant to the budget-conscious photographer who wants versatile zoom power without breaking the bank: the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40.
I’ve spent extensive time shooting in various conditions with both cameras, checking their specs, ergonomic handling, and real-world image output to help you decide which fits your photography needs and budget best. Whether you’re dabbling in wildlife, travel, or casual shooting, I’ll break down the practical differences backed by my testing to give you a crystal clear buying guide.
First Impression: Size, Handling, and Build
Before you even point the lens, the feel in your hands is pivotal. Both cameras channel a classic DSLR-like bridge form but differ in subtle ergonomics and size.
-
Fujifilm S4800: Measures 122mm x 93mm x 100mm, weighing in at 518g with its 4x AA batteries. Its body is a little chunkier, and because it uses standard AA batteries, you avoid proprietary battery worries but potentially sacrifice longer shoot times. The grip is decent but on the compact side - comfortable for short bursts but might tire your hands in longer sessions.
-
Panasonic FZ40: Slightly smaller and lighter at 120mm x 80mm x 92mm and 494g, the FZ40 feels a tad more refined ergonomically. Using a proprietary lithium-ion battery, it delivers longer battery life and a more balanced heft that lessens fatigue over a day of shooting.
Ergonomics verdict: If you like to swap batteries on the fly with a quick trip to the grocery store (aka AA batteries), Fujifilm’s approach has charm. But for those who want a sleeker, slightly lighter build with better endurance, Panasonic nudges ahead.
Control Layout and User Interface: Intuitive or Clunky?
Handling ease makes or breaks the user experience, especially when you want to capture fleeting moments.
Both cameras sport traditional bridge camera control layouts with mode dials, exposure compensation wheels, and quick access buttons:
-
S4800: Features simple but somewhat basic control clusters. The absence of a viewfinder (optical or electronic) means relying solely on the fixed 3” LCD, which can be limiting in bright sunlight. A downside here is the lack of customizable buttons and no touchscreen, meaning you’re stuck scrolling with physical buttons.
-
FZ40: Comes with an electronic viewfinder, a serious advantage for composing in harsh light or when you want stability by shooting at eye level. The controls include manual focus rings and dedicated dials that feel akin to entry-level DSLRs, granting more tactile control - something enthusiasts appreciate. The UI is more polished with better feedback.
Trade-off: Fujifilm’s S4800 is simple to navigate but feels dated. Panasonic's FZ40 edges out with improved ergonomics and pro-feeling controls, which means faster operation and less fumbling.
Sensor and Image Quality: Key Specs Breakdown
The heart of any camera is its sensor, and here both use the ubiquitous 1/2.3” CCD sensor type with similar physical dimensions, but the devil’s in the details.
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Panasonic FZ40 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Resolution | 16 MP | 14 MP |
Max ISO | 6400 (boosted) | 6400 native |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
The slightly higher resolution of the S4800 gives it an edge on paper, but more megapixels on a small sensor can mean denser pixel packing and potential noise penalties. Interestingly, the FZ40 supports RAW capture, a crucial feature for enthusiasts wanting full control over post-processing flexibility - a big plus.
In testing, the Panasonic's Venus Engine HD II processor made a noticeable difference handling noise reduction and color rendering. The S4800’s images at base ISO are crisp and detailed but start showing noise earlier past ISO 400. The Panasonic's images have cleaner shadows and better dynamic range performance, an essential factor if you shoot landscapes or scenes with high contrast.
Let’s Talk About the Screen and Viewfinder
Both cameras pack a 3” fixed LCD with identical 230K dot resolutions. But that’s where similarity ends.
-
Fujifilm S4800: No viewfinder at all - only the LCD. The fixed LCD is a TFT type offering accurate colors when viewed head-on, but sunlight glare quickly becomes an issue. For careful composition, you’ll want a hood or to shoot indoors mostly.
-
Panasonic FZ40: The addition of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) changes the game. While the EVF isn’t high-res by today’s standards, it dramatically improves usability in bright outdoor conditions. For manual focusing, the EVF helps you nail focus, something you’ll appreciate given the fast lens and manual focus ring.
If you tend to shoot outdoors or want a more traditional shooting experience, Panasonic’s FZ40 makes a compelling case here.
Zoom Range and Lens Performance: Is Longer Always Better?
Superzoom cameras live and die by their zoom capabilities. Let’s compare:
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Panasonic FZ40 |
---|---|---|
Focal Range (35mm eq.) | 24-720mm (30x) | 25-600mm (24x) |
Max Aperture | f/3.1 (wide) - f/5.9 (tele) | f/2.8 (wide) - f/5.2 (tele) |
Macro Capability | 2 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Fujifilm’s longer reach (720mm!): Great when you want extreme telephoto shots - think distant wildlife or sports. But note the extra-long reach comes at the cost of a slower maximum aperture and more susceptibility to camera shake. The sensor-shift stabilization can help, but it’s no panacea at such extreme zoom lengths.
Panasonic’s faster lens: Wide-open aperture at f/2.8 means better low-light and shallow depth-of-field capabilities. While the zoom tops out at a still respectable 600mm, the lens optics are sharper across the zoom range, delivering cleaner edges and less distortion. The closer macro focusing at 1 cm also offers better close-up flexibility.
For long-range shooters who are patient with slower apertures, the S4800 might be more appealing. Meanwhile, Panasonic’s FZ40 serves better for generalist use, low-light conditions, and macro work.
Autofocus Systems and Continuous Shooting
Reliable autofocus and burst rates directly impact candid photography, sports, and wildlife use.
-
S4800 autofocus: Uses contrast detection with face detection but no phase detection or sophisticated tracking. Single autofocus is available, along with continuous AF and tracking modes. However, it’s on the slow side - expect lag in low light or when zoomed in.
-
FZ40 autofocus: Also contrast detection only, lacking phase detection. But Panasonic includes manual focus rings with focus assist, which many shooters appreciate for precise control. Continuous autofocus is not supported, but single AF is reasonably fast with good accuracy.
Continuous shooting:
-
S4800 caps at 1 fps (frames per second) - painfully slow for action or fast wildlife.
-
FZ40 doubles that at 2 fps, not blazing but still better for casual sports photography.
Neither camera is ideal for professionals chasing fast action, but for the price and category, the FZ40 offers a modest advantage.
Video Capabilities: Modest but Sufficient
Neither of these bridge cameras targets professional video creators, but they do allow for casual video capture.
Specs | Fujifilm S4800 | Panasonic FZ40 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | HD 1280 x 720 at 30 fps | HD 1280 x 720 at 60/30 fps |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
The Panasonic FZ40 wins in frame rate flexibility, letting you record smoother 60fps HD video, excellent for slight slow-motion or smoother playback. The Fujifilm maxes out at 30fps, which is still acceptable for general use. Both lack microphone inputs, limiting audio quality control.
Neither camera will replace a dedicated video camera or modern mirrorless, but for family clips or travel vlogs on a budget, they get the job done.
Battery Life and Storage
-
S4800: Uses 4 standard AA batteries, convenient for travelers who might not have access to charging but potentially heavier in the bag. Buy good NiMH rechargeables to reduce waste and running costs.
-
FZ40: Equipped with a proprietary lithium-ion pack delivering significantly longer life - ideal for shooting whole days without hunting for spares.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot, with Panasonic also supporting internal storage, a nice extra safety net.
Weather-Resistance and Durability
Neither camera boasts weather sealing, waterproofing, or ruggedness, which is typical for budget bridge models. Both should be treated as indoor or fair-weather travel companions rather than all-weather workhorses.
For serious outdoor pros, rugged compacts or mirrored DSLRs with sealing would be better bets.
Sample Image Quality: Real World Shooting
Shooting side-by-side under controlled daylight conditions and low light walks:
-
Fujifilm S4800 produces vibrant colors and good detail at base ISO but starts showing chroma noise and softness beyond ISO 400.
-
Panasonic FZ40 with slightly lower megapixel count delivers very clean images with balanced shadows and less noise even at higher ISO settings.
In landscapes, Panasonic’s better dynamic range allows more detail recovery in shadows and highlights. For portraits, the wider aperture lens and closer macros deliver more pleasing background blur, although don’t expect DSLR-like bokeh from either.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Fujifilm FinePix S4800
Pros:
- Massive 30x zoom (24–720 mm eq.)
- Sensor-shift stabilization
- Simple AA battery use
- Good image resolution (16 MP)
Cons:
- Slow autofocus and continuous shooting
- No RAW support
- No viewfinder, only LCD
- Lower max aperture limits low-light and bokeh ability
- Older interface and less refined ergonomics
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40
Pros:
- Faster f/2.8 zoom lens (25–600 mm eq.)
- Electronic viewfinder + manual focus ring
- RAW support for post-processing control
- Better autofocus speed and accuracy
- Higher frame rate video (720p @ 60fps)
- Proprietary battery with longer life
Cons:
- Slightly shorter zoom range (24x vs. 30x)
- Higher price point (~$419 vs $229)
- No continuous autofocus or tracking
- No touchscreen or wireless features
Which One Should You Buy?
Making a choice depends heavily on what you want from your camera.
For the Casual Photographer and Cheapskate
If your heart’s set on stretching every penny and you want longer zoom reach for occasional snapshooting, the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 offers excellent value. Its extensive zoom combined with AA battery power makes it travel-friendly with easy power backups. It’s best for daylight travel snaps, casual portraits, or wildlife if you’re patient.
For Enthusiasts and Hobbyists Seeking Control
If you value image quality, manual controls, and a better user experience, then Panasonic Lumix FZ40 is the clear winner despite its higher price. The RAW support allows you to improve images beyond the camera’s base processing, and its faster lens plus viewfinder make it capable in diverse shooting conditions, including indoor events and low light.
Broader Use Case Breakdown
Photography Type | Fujifilm S4800 Score | Panasonic FZ40 Score | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Portraits | 6/10 | 7.5/10 | Panasonic’s faster lens better bokeh & detail |
Landscape | 6/10 | 7/10 | Panasonic’s dynamic range slightly better |
Wildlife | 5/10 | 6.5/10 | Fujifilm’s zoom longer but slow AF limits usability |
Sports | 4/10 | 5/10 | Neither great; Panasonic’s faster burst helps somewhat |
Street | 5/10 | 6/10 | Panasonic smaller & EVF adds discreet shooting options |
Macro | 6/10 | 7.5/10 | Panasonic closer focusing distance, better detail |
Night/Astro | 4/10 | 6/10 | Panasonic’s better noise control extends usability |
Video | 5/10 | 6.5/10 | Panasonic’s 60fps smoothness stands out |
Travel | 6/10 | 7/10 | Panasonic’s battery & ergonomics easier on the road |
Professional | 3/10 | 4/10 | Neither strictly pro, but Panasonic’s RAW is notable |
Overall Performance Ratings
Our hands-on tests confirm Panasonic’s FZ40 consistently outperforms the Fujifilm S4800 by about one grade across general usage. The improvements in handling, sensor output, and feature set justify the price jump for most users requiring better creative control.
The Conclusion: Which Bridge Camera Wins?
If you’re selecting between these two small sensor bridge superzooms based on your needs:
-
Go for the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 if you want a budget-friendly zoom monster primarily for casual use or travel where AA batteries are a plus.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 if you want better image quality, more control, faster video frame rates, and an EVF, and don’t mind paying a little more up-front for a more adaptable camera.
Both cameras deliver solid image quality for their price and era, but Panasonic’s additional polish, shooting flexibility, and RAW support make it the better all-around tool for hobbyists and serious amateurs alike.
If you want me to sum this up in one sentence: Panasonic FZ40 is the smarter investment for those wanting enduring versatility and image quality; Fujifilm S4800 is a cheapskate’s faithful zoom companion.
I hope this deep dive helps you zero in on the camera that matches your style and shooting needs. Both cameras have strengths, but knowing their real-world quirks lets you avoid painful surprises and get snapping faster. Let me know if you want follow-up tips on lenses, accessories, or workflow with these models!
Happy shooting!
Fujifilm S4800 vs Panasonic FZ40 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ45 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 9.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 518g (1.14 lb) | 494g (1.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $229 | $420 |