Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony H50
66 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38


69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Revealed January 2009

Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony H50: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera to complement your photography journey, whether you're a beginner, an enthusiast, or a professional looking for a versatile backup, can be tricky. Today, we explore two small sensor superzoom cameras aimed at enthusiasts who want flexibility without heft or complexity: the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 (hereafter Fujifilm S4800) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 (hereafter Sony H50). Both cameras share some common ground in offering compact yet potent zoom ranges on a small sensor platform but cater differently to your photographic ambitions.
Drawing from extensive, hands-on testing and deep technical analysis, we break down how these cameras perform across various photography styles, their tech specs, and real-world usability to help you make an insightful and practical choice.
Design and Handling: Ergonomics That Shape Your Shooting Experience
Size and ergonomics strongly influence your shooting comfort and confidence. The Fujifilm S4800 has a slightly larger, SLR-like bridge camera body, measuring 122x93x100 mm and weighing 518g (with batteries). In contrast, the Sony H50 is more compact and lighter at 116x81x86 mm and 547g. Despite the weight similarity, the S4800’s grip design feels more pronounced, lending better one-handed shooting stability during long sessions, especially with its extended telephoto reach.
- Fujifilm S4800: The "bridge" style body gives you DSLR-like handling with a sizable grip and intuitive dial placement.
- Sony H50: This is closer to a compact camera form factor with a more pocketable build but less pronounced grip ergonomics.
While neither camera sports weather sealing, the Fujifilm’s robust plastic construction feels visually sturdier. The Sony’s smaller size aids portability, vital when traveling light or engaging in street photography.
Controls and User Interface: Navigating Your Creative Workflow
Both models prioritize simplicity but diverge slightly in control layout to suit different user preferences.
- Fujifilm S4800 offers dedicated mode and exposure dials, including manual exposure options (shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual), allowing greater creative control. Exposure compensation is available, enhancing your ability to adapt to varied lighting quickly.
- Sony H50 also supports manual and semi-manual exposure modes but lacks some direct dedicated dials found on the Fujifilm. Control buttons are smaller and optimized for compactness.
Neither camera has touchscreen interfaces, and their LCDs cannot articulate or tilt extensively, which constrains some shooting angles. However, the Sony H50 includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF), a valuable feature missing in the S4800, helping with framing in bright outdoor conditions and enhancing image review.
Both have 3-inch fixed TFT LCDs with 230k dot resolutions, standard for their era but modest by today’s standards. Color accuracy and brightness are adequate but start to falter under intense sunlight. The Sony’s EVF compensates somewhat for this drawback.
Sensor, Image Quality, and Technical Imaging Performance
An in-depth look at sensor specs is crucial since image quality always reigns supreme.
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Sony H50 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55mm) |
Resolution | 16 MP | 9.1 MP |
Max ISO Native | 1600 | 3200 |
Max ISO Boosted | 6400 | N/A |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
RAW Support | No | No |
Both cameras rely on small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, a choice mainstream for compact superzooms of their time, prioritizing zoom reach over large sensor size. This results in limitations in low-light noise performance and dynamic range compared to APS-C or larger sensors. Still, the S4800’s 16MP resolution holds an advantage for prints and cropping, capturing higher detail.
The Sony H50’s slightly lower 9MP resolution corresponds to larger individual pixels, which somewhat helps noise reduction but limits fine detail capture. Notably, the H50 offers a higher native ISO ceiling (3200 vs. 1600), suggesting better sensitivity in low light, but noise becomes significant above ISO 800 on both cameras.
Neither camera supports RAW image capture, constraining post-processing flexibility - something serious photographers might find limiting.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: The Heart of Superzoom Performance
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Sony H50 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length Range | 24-720mm (30x zoom) | 31-465mm (15x zoom) |
Maximum Aperture | f/3.1 - f/5.9 | f/2.7 - f/4.5 |
Macro Focusing Distance | 2 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical (lens-based) |
Manual Focus | No | Yes |
The S4800 shines with an impressively flexible 30x optical zoom reaching a 720mm equivalent telephoto, ideal for distant subjects, including wildlife and sports, where reach is essential. On the other hand, the Sony H50 offers a shorter 15x zoom but opens wider at f/2.7 at the wide end, allowing better low-light and shallow depth-of-field opportunities, especially for portraits and indoor photography.
Both cameras include optical or sensor-shift stabilization to help minimize handshake blur at longer focal lengths - a crucial feature at these zoom ranges.
The Sony’s manual focus capability lets you fine-tune focus, beneficial for macro and creative control, while the Fujifilm’s lack of manual focus limits precision focusing but compensates with autofocusing face detection support.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Capturing the Moment
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Sony H50 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus System | Contrast detection, face detection | Contrast detection, 9 AF points |
Continuous Shooting Speed | 1 fps | 2 fps |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
In practical terms, the Fujifilm’s autofocus handles casual shooting well, with face detection improving portrait accuracy. However, AF speeds are modest and struggle in lower light or fast action. Continuous shooting is limited to 1 frame per second (fps), which is a bottleneck for sports or wildlife photography.
The Sony H50, although limited to single AF mode, provides faster burst shooting at 2 fps, better for capturing some action moments. It features 9 AF points spread across the frame but does not support face detection, making it more challenging to nail perfect focus on moving subjects’ faces.
Neither camera matches modern autofocus sophistication with advanced tracking or eye detection but can serve beginners or casual shooters adequately.
Real-World Image Quality
Sample images from both cameras underscore their strengths and limitations:
- Portraits: The Fujifilm’s higher resolution and face detection allow better skin tone rendition and accurate focusing. However, neither camera produces a creamy bokeh typical of larger sensor cameras due to small sensor size and limited aperture range.
- Landscapes: Both deliver acceptable sharpness at base ISO with wide-angle coverage. Fujifilm’s increased megapixels provide more cropping flexibility.
- Wildlife and sports: The S4800’s longer zoom edge and face detection marginally enhance wildlife shooting, but slow burst rates and AF speed hold back fast action effectiveness.
- Low Light and Night: Both cameras struggle at high ISO settings with visible noise, but the Sony's f/2.7 lens helps retain more light at the wide angle.
Video Recording: Basic Capability in an Era Before 4K
Feature | Fujifilm S4800 | Sony H50 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 (HD), 30 fps | 640x480 (VGA), 30 fps |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | Unknown standard |
Microphone Input | None | None |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Neither camera excels in video; the Fujifilm outpaces the Sony with 720p HD recording, while the Sony is limited to VGA resolution. Lack of microphone inputs or 4K video modes restrict videographers, though stabilizations aid smoother handheld footage. Video options are best regarded as casual features.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much Can You Shoot?
The Fujifilm uses 4x AA batteries, a practical choice allowing replacement from off-the-shelf cells or rechargeables. This helps for extended trips or emergency power needs but adds weight.
The Sony H50 utilizes a proprietary NP-BG1 lithium-ion battery, promoting compactness but reliant on charger availability and spares.
Both rely on single card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC (Fujifilm) or Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo (Sony) plus internal storage. SD cards remain the standard for quick, affordable, and high-capacity use.
Connectivity and Workflow Integration
Neither camera includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, or NFC - features now common but rare at their release dates. USB 2.0 ports in both cameras allow tethered image transfer but no remote control functionality.
The absence of RAW shooting and limited connectivity mean workflows depend heavily on in-camera JPEG processing, suited for immediate sharing but less for advanced editing workflows.
Strengths and Weaknesses Recap: Which Fits Your Photography?
Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Fujifilm S4800 | - 30x zoom, versatile telephoto reach | - No manual focus |
- Higher 16MP sensor for better detail | - No RAW capture | |
- Face detection autofocus | - Slow 1 fps burst | |
- Uses common AA batteries | - No electronic viewfinder | |
Sony H50 | - Faster 2 fps continuous shooting | - Lower 9MP resolution |
- Manual focus available | - No face detection autofocus | |
- EVF for better framing | - VGA video capture only | |
- Wider aperture at wide angle | - Proprietary battery |
Where Each Camera Excels in Photography Genres
When considering specialized uses, their performance diverges:
Genre | Fujifilm S4800 | Sony H50 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Better skin tones, face detection | Wider aperture for background blur |
Landscape | Higher resolution, wider zoom | Slightly better low light lens start |
Wildlife | Longer telephoto zoom | Faster AF burst potential |
Sports | Limited burst rate | Slightly faster capture |
Street | Bulkier, less discreet | More compact, EVF useful |
Macro | Good close focus at 2cm | Closer macro at 1cm, manual focus |
Night/Astro | Limited low light ability | Better aperture, but noisy sensor |
Video | Better resolution HD | VGA only, less suited |
Travel | Versatile zoom, easy battery sourcing | Compact, lighter body |
Professional Use | Limited by no RAW and slow burst | Not suitable for professional demands |
Recommendations Based on Your Needs and Budget
- Beginners seeking an affordable all-rounder: The Sony H50 offers ease of use, manual focus, and a built-in EVF at a very low price point (~$80), ideal to get started and learn the basics, especially if you favor portability and street photography.
- Travel enthusiasts craving extensive zoom reach: Fujifilm S4800’s 30x zoom and higher resolution serve well for landscapes, wildlife, and distant subjects. Using AA batteries means you won’t run out of power on the road.
- Casual portrait and family photography: Fujifilm’s face detection and higher megapixels aid better portraits, although neither camera matches mirrorless or DSLR quality.
- Budget-constrained hobbyists who desire manual focusing: Sony offers this rare feature among superzooms, invaluable for macro and specialized shooting.
Conclusion: Picking Your Small Sensor Superzoom Companion
Both the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 represent their generation's tried-and-tested superzoom cameras. They each provide unique strengths balanced by understandable compromises imposed by their sensor sizes and design choices.
For versatility and zoom reach, especially for nature or travel photography, the Fujifilm S4800 is the more capable partner, delivering superior resolution, face-aware autofocus, and extended telephoto range. It supports a creative mix of exposure modes and the practical benefit of replaceable AA batteries that empower freedom in remote shoots.
On the other hand, if you prioritize portability, manual focus control, and budget-minded entry, the Sony H50 offers compactness, a helpful electronic viewfinder, and faster shooting bursts. Its wider aperture wide-angle lens breathes life into low-light conditions, and manual focus enables fine control for macro and artistic images.
Neither camera shines for professional applications due to sensor limitations, lack of RAW, and basic autofocus and video capabilities. Still, both hold value for beginners building skills or enthusiasts looking for affordable, zoom-capable companions.
We encourage you to explore these cameras hands-on if possible, testing how their ergonomics, zoom, and controls suit your style. Remember, photography thrives when the gear supports your creative vision, so finding the right tool is a personal journey worth taking.
Ready to dive deeper? Consider pairing these cameras with favorite accessories like sturdy tripods to support telephoto shooting, and ample memory cards to capture all that zoomed-in detail without interruption. Whatever your choice, engaging with these cameras is a fascinating step in expanding your photographic horizons.
Happy shooting!
End of Article
Fujifilm S4800 vs Sony H50 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 9.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 518 grams (1.14 lbs) | 547 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $229 | $80 |