Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
![Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8200/Fujifilm-S8200-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3/Olympus-SH-3-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Let's look closer at the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S8200 was introduced 4 years before the SH-3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores versus the SH-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Olympus SH-3
Fujifilm S8200 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Fujifilm S8200
SH-3 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 37 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Olympus SH-3
Fujifilm S8200 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8200 provides physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S8200 versus Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 against the SH-3.
![Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8200-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and SH-3 is 61 and 88 respectively.
![Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8200-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and SH-3.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you will want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm S8200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8200-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8200-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8200 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $450 | $579 |