Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
53 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- Refreshed by Sony RX10 IV
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm S8200 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") possess different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm S8200 was released 4 years before the RX10 III which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores versus the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Sony RX10 III
Fujifilm S8200 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Fujifilm S8200
RX10 III | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2016 | January 2013 | Newer by 39 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Sony RX10 III
Fujifilm S8200 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8200 enjoys outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 compared to the RX10 III.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and RX10 III is 61 and 53 respectively.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and RX10 III.
Plainly, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm S8200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 III will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S8200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 1051 grams (2.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $450 | $1,398 |