Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched March 2013
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both are created by FujiFilm. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S8400W was released 9 months earlier than the Fujifilm S9200 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades against the Fujifilm S9200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W & Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery & Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Fujifilm S9200
| Fujifilm S8400W | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| Fujifilm S9200 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | March 2013 | More modern by 9 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Fujifilm S9200
| Fujifilm S8400W | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8400W has got exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W and the Fujifilm S9200.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and Fujifilm S9200 is 61 and 61 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and Fujifilm S9200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files though you will want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm S8400W is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Portrait photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Street photography info
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography info
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average (670g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (670g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9200
incredible zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery (500 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Travel photography info
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography info
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (1056mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (670 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
great battery (500 shots)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (670 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Landscape photography info
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography info
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
great battery (500 per charge)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging info
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging info
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than average (670 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (670g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S8400W vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 670 gr (1.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 500 pictures |
| Battery type | AA | AA |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |