Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ad8/58ad8beaf10ab1e997eee3fd9d70d871d24d2ac7" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0405c/0405cbd1771c68e0e2f7522f4f00cce6f4c0bde2" alt="Nikon Coolpix P900 front Nikon Coolpix P900 front"
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Announced March 2015
- Newer Model is Nikon P1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon P900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the P900 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9200 was brought out 14 months prior to the P900 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades against the P900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Nikon Coolpix P900. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Nikon P900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Nikon P900
Fujifilm S9200 | P900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Fujifilm S9200
P900 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 14 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon P900
Fujifilm S9200 | P900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 features physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon P900 has proportions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") accompanied by a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon P900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the P900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e09/b4e09084115bab09bd2839868c5622fa0475ac4f" alt="Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and P900 is 61 and 52 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ea55/0ea555e7530c94bd407884f541530d30c912393c" alt="Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and P900.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of images however you will need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm S9200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25b0b/25b0bedfec3057c8fda79d884741006c189bd586" alt="Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f445/3f445f2c6659e66c97429c64bbaed566ebe7707e" alt="Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon P900 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Nikon Coolpix P900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Nikon Coolpix P900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-06 | 2015-03-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | 921k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 899 grams (1.98 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 360 photos |
Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL23 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $600 |