Clicky

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Introduced March 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus SH-1
  • Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

The following is a in depth assessment of the Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S9200 was manufactured 14 months prior to the SH-2 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades vs the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm S9200 SH-2 

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm S9200

 SH-2 Fujifilm S9200 
IntroducedMarch 2015January 2014Newer by 14 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm S9200 SH-2 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 provides external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the SH-2.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and SH-2 is 61 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and SH-2.

Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos however you really should take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm S9200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography features
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography features
37
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
44
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Street photography info
Olympus SH-2 Street photography info
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors (670g)
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
includes focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (271g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography information
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography information
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery (500 per charge)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
51
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (380 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Travel photography camera
54
better than average battery (500 per charge)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
74
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
includes focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-2
44
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
55
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Vlogging camera
26
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of mic port
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
35
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9200 and Olympus SH-2
 Fujifilm FinePix S9200Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9200 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-01-06 2015-03-11
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s 11.5 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 271 grams (0.60 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images 380 images
Type of battery AA Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $399