Clicky

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
39
Overall
37
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Launched January 2012
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm SL240 was launched 24 months before the Astro Zoom AZ651 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 matches up versus the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 Fujifilm SL240 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm SL240

 Astro Zoom AZ651 Fujifilm SL240 
IntroducedJanuary 2014January 2012More modern by 24 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 Fujifilm SL240 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL240 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has specifications of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 compared to the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 67 and 65 respectively.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL240 and Astro Zoom AZ651.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL240 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography info
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography info
38
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
53
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
features face detection focus
exports RAW formats
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm SL240
Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competition (510 grams)
59
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (567 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Sports photography details
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography details
47
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
51
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Travel photography features
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography features
54
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great reach (576mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (510g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
60
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1560mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (567g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL240
Landscape photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
41
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
54
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21MP)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm SL240 Vlogging highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging highlights
24
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (510g)
60
pretty wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
no external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (567g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Fujifilm FinePix SL240Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix SL240 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-01-05 2014-01-07
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 21MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-576mm (24.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing range 2cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 97% 100%
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 510 grams (1.12 lb) 567 grams (1.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-85 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $280 $419