Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91294/91294afcddfb537e41c3a35a65fed92124da3a89" alt="Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077c8/077c8d0ffde6e06784e3efdfa010c6cd7eb8c7da" alt="Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front"
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm SL240 was launched 24 months before the Astro Zoom AZ651 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm SL240 matches up versus the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm SL240 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm SL240
Astro Zoom AZ651 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm SL240 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL240 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has specifications of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm SL240 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 compared to the Astro Zoom AZ651.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c924/5c9243ee17c8d739d2b5db5ace38235bf56b020d" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 67 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461e7/461e708eb47fe2e34e69b781bbbccbdcf6f73980" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL240 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL240 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba082/ba08205c7b491b2b570d48c3302eec288f1be1ed" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd18f/dd18fa55a786ab84f945fd3818397b35b1fbda4a" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 21MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 510 grams (1.12 lb) | 567 grams (1.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-85 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $419 |