Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V
Portability
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Replaced the Sony HX300
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and HX400V (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL240 was brought out 3 years before the HX400V and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm SL240 matches up against the HX400V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Sony HX400V
| Fujifilm SL240 | HX400V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Fujifilm SL240
| HX400V | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Sony HX400V
| Fujifilm SL240 | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm SL240 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") with a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") having a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 and the HX400V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm SL240 and HX400V is 67 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL240 and HX400V.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sony HX400V to result in more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL240 will be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography features
Sony HX400V Portrait photography features
MP count decent (14MP)
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm SL240
Street photography with Sony HX400V
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average in class (660g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 Sports photography factors
Sony HX400V Sports photography factors
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 Travel photography info
Sony HX400V Travel photography info
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (576mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (660 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 Landscape photography factors
Sony HX400V Landscape photography factors
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 Vlogging details
Sony HX400V Vlogging details
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have microphone socket
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than average in class (660 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm SL240 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 510g (1.12 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-85 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $280 | $448 |
