Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-520 was introduced 8 years earlier than the E-M10 II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-520 grades versus the E-M10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 E-520 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-520

 E-M10 II E-520 
RevealedAugust 2015August 2008More recent by 85 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-M10 II

 E-520 E-M10 II 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-520 vs the E-M10 II.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and E-M10 II is 68 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and E-M10 II.

As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M10 II to result in extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography details
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
72
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-520
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
83
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-520
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good battery (650 shots)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
MP count low (10MP)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography highlights
52
good battery (650 CIPA)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
73
has touch focus
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
does not posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography factors
58
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
good battery (650 shots)
small screen (2.7")
MP count low (10MP)
no Time Lapse function
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging factors
9
no video
35
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Olympus E-520Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2008-08-20 2015-08-25
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Lowest enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 390 gr (0.86 pounds)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 73
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.5
DXO Low light rating 548 842
Other
Battery life 650 images 320 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $400 $499