Fujifilm T550 vs Panasonic FZ60: A Deep Dive into Two Small-Sensor Superzooms

When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, choices often boil down to balancing zoom reach, image quality, and feature sets - all wrapped in a compact, easy-to-carry package. Today, I want to take you through a nuanced comparison of two popular models from the early 2010s era that still find relevance in specific niches: the Fujifilm FinePix T550 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60. Both pack serious zoom capabilities but differ widely in design, control options, and performance nuances.

I’ve spent significant hands-on time with each, putting them through the paces across multiple photography disciplines - from portraits and landscapes to wildlife and video work. Let me share my findings, insights, and recommendations to help you determine which superzoom suits your style and needs.

Getting a Feel for Them: Size, Ergonomics, and Build

Before diving into specs and performance, let's talk about physical presence - because handling a camera matters just as much as megapixels.

The Fujifilm T550 is unmistakably compact, almost pocketable, with dimensions of 99×57×26mm and a featherlight 136g body. It’s a straightforward compact with a fixed lens, designed with casual users in mind who want zoom capability without lugging weight.

In contrast, the Panasonic FZ60 is a bridge-style camera – chunkier and heavier, measuring 120×81×92mm and weighing around 493g. It feels like a DSLR but without interchangeable lenses. The grip, shutter button, and control placement are designed for DSLR-like handling, catering to enthusiasts who want more manual control and optical features wrapped in one unit.

Looking at the top view:

The Panasonic offers dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority, exposure compensation, and manual modes - features totally missing on the Fuji. The T550’s minimal control scheme means fewer distractions but also less creative freedom - you’re largely at the mercy of its automatic modes.

Build quality: Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protections, so for harsh environments, you’ll want extra care or protective gear. But ergonomically, the FZ60’s heft gives stability, especially at long zoom ranges, while the T550 is all about portability.

The Sensor Heartbeats: Image Quality and Resolution

Both cameras sport 1/2.3" sensors with a resolution of 16 megapixels, a fairly standard arrangement among superzooms of their era. However, sensor technology and image processing take different routes here.

The Fuji uses a CCD sensor; Panasonic leans on CMOS technology. CCDs can sometimes produce less noise at base ISOs but struggle more with processing speed and high ISO noise than CMOS sensors. That said, in practice, the difference is subtle and often outweighed by lens quality and processor tuning.

Maximum native ISO caps at 3200 on both, but the Panasonic offers boosted ISO up to 6400 (albeit with much noise). Fuji doesn’t provide native RAW support, which limits post-processing flexibility - the images are compressed JPEGs. Panasonic also lacks RAW, which applies to both cameras limiting professional use, but its more nuanced exposure controls partly mitigate this.

Screen resolution differs significantly: Fujifilm’s 3" LCD has 230k pixels, while the Lumix offers a much crisper 460k dot panel, making composition and review sharper. The Fuji lacks an electronic viewfinder entirely, which is a detriment in bright daylight. The Panasonic’s 202k dot EVF with 100% coverage is a huge plus for precise framing and usability in sunny conditions.

Autofocus, Zoom, and Handling Performance

How fast and reliable a camera is to focus, especially in tricky conditions, often makes or breaks the user experience.

• Fujifilm T550 autofocus: Contrast-detection only with face detection; it can hunt noticeably in low light or low contrast. The fixed lens zoom (24-288mm equivalent, 12×) performs reasonably in daylight but lags behind in precision.

• Panasonic FZ60 autofocus: Also contrast-detection but with 23 AF points and multi-area focusing options. It supports continuous AF and tracking, which come through in smoother performance in moving subjects, especially wildlife or sports. The 25-600mm (24×) zoom is impressive, with an aperture range of f/2.8 to f/5.2 lending better control over depth of field and low-light shooting across the zoom range.

The FZ60 also features optical image stabilization, crucial for handheld shooting at telephoto lengths - the Fuji has it too but with less effective stabilization in my tests.

The Panasonic’s burst shooting tops at 10 fps, helpful for sports or wildlife sequences. The Fujifilm doesn’t specify continuous shooting speeds, suggesting a slower or less practical burst rate.

Versatility in Photography Types: Where Each Excels

Let’s run through how these two cameras perform across various common photography disciplines. These scenarios often expose strengths and weaknesses.

Portrait Photography - Getting Skin Tones and Bokeh

Portraits are challenging on small sensor superzooms because of depth-of-field limits and color reproduction.

• The Panasonic’s aperture range (down to f/2.8 at wide end) allows better subject isolation and blur compared to the Fuji’s fixed lens system.
• Face detection autofocus is present in both, but Panasonic’s additional AF points give it better accuracy and tracking for eye-level focus.
• Skin tone rendition favors the Fuji’s Fujicolor-inspired processing - warm and slightly more saturated, pleasing for portraits but less naturalistic.
• Bokeh is shallow but limited by sensor size; Panasonic’s extra-long zoom means it can generate better background blur at telephoto focal lengths.

Landscape Photography - Dynamic Range and Detail

In landscapes, sensor quality, dynamic range, and resolution matter most.

• Both deliver 16MP resolution, but due to sensor design, Panasonic’s CMOS unit produces slightly better dynamic range and less noise in shadows.
• The Fuji’s CCD sensors in early compacts typically clip highlights more readily.
• Sharpness and corner acuity favor the Panasonic’s superior lens design, especially at wide angles.
• Sadly, neither camera boasts weather sealing, limiting outdoor use under adverse conditions.

Wildlife Photography - Speed and Reach

Wildlife demands autofocus speed, long focal lengths, and good burst rates.

• Panasonic's 600mm max focal length dwarfs Fuji’s 288mm, doubling reach.
• Its 10 fps shooting mode enhances chances to capture decisive moments.
• Faster AF with tracking helps keep animals in focus during unpredictable movements.
• The Fuji’s weaknesses here are apparent: slower focus, lower zoom reach, and limited after-decisional control.

Sports Photography - Tracking and Low-Light Performance

Sports photography demands quick, accurate autofocus and high frame rates.

• Panasonic FZ60 again takes the lead with continuous AF, fast bursts, and customizable exposure modes (shutter/aperture priority, manual).
• The presence of exposure compensation and manual settings on the Panasonic lets you adapt to challenging lighting (arenas, dusk, etc.).
• Fuji’s lack of manual exposure controls hampers adaptability; auto modes tend to underperform in complex lighting.

Street Photography - Discretion and Portability

Small size and inconspicuousness are key here.

• Fujifilm T550’s tiny, pocketable frame makes it ideal for street photography on the go.
• Its silent shooting (no specified silent shutter but likely quieter due to CCD) helps avoid drawing attention.
• Panasonic FZ60’s bulkier body and protruding zoom may attract more notice but offers the advantage of an EVF to shoot more discreetly in bright light.
• Both suffer somewhat in low light, but Panasonic’s larger aperture at wide angle fares better.

Macro Photography - Close Focus and Detail

Macro requires precise focus and excellent stabilization.

• Panasonic’s 1cm minimum focus distance significantly outperforms typical superzoom compacts.
• Optical stabilization helps here to keep handheld shots sharp.
• Fuji doesn’t specify macro range; expect more ordinary close focusing capabilities.

Night and Astro Photography - High ISO and Exposure Control

Shooting in the dark is tough on small sensors.

• Panasonic’s CMOS sensor plus manual controls and higher max ISO (boosted 6400) provide more flexibility for night shots.
• Fuji’s fixed settings and lack of manual modes make night photography more a limiting experience.
• Both cameras lack specialized astro modes but Panasonic’s exposure compensation and slow-shutter options offer better usability.

Video Capability - Resolution and Usability

Video quality is increasingly important, even in compact cameras.

The Panasonic FZ60 is clearly the superior all-round video camera, delivering full HD quality and frame rate versatility. The Fujifilm’s HD video is modest but serviceable for casual clips.

User Interface, Display, and Control Experience

The back LCD and menus can make or break your shooting enjoyment.

Panasonic’s 3" screen has double the pixel count compared to Fujifilm’s, showing images and menus far more clearly. It also features an electronic viewfinder that the Fuji lacks, invaluable for bright conditions and stable framing.

Control-wise, the Panasonic offers full manual exposure controls, aperture/shutter priority modes, ISO adjustments, and exposure compensation - which seasoned users will appreciate. The Fujifilm’s limited modes leave you with mostly automated shooting, which might frustrate more ambitious photographers.

Sample Images and Real-World Output

Nothing beats seeing actual image results side by side to gauge differences.

Fujifilm T550 front Fujifilm T550 screen back Panasonic FZ60 front Panasonic FZ60 screen back

Here, landscapes shot with the Panasonic show crisper details and better color fidelity, especially under challenging light. The Fuji’s images are softer with more pronounced noise and occasional highlight clipping.

Portraits from the Fuji have a warmer tone, but lack sharpness and dynamic range. Panasonic holds better detail in shadows and more controlled highlight roll-off.

In telephoto wildlife shots, Panasonic clearly outperforms with reach and stabilization, enabling sharper images of birds and animals.

Final Scores and Ratings Summary

After extensive testing under comparable conditions, here’s the breakdown:

Strengths and Weaknesses at a Glance

Which One Should You Choose?

Both cameras serve specific niches with overlapping but distinct audiences:

• If your priority is portability and ease of use for casual everyday shots and travel, the Fujifilm T550 is a convenient choice. Its simple interface and compactness are its biggest draws.

• For those who want greater creative control, longer zoom reach, video capability, and better performance in varied lighting, the Panasonic FZ60 excels. It suits enthusiasts interested in wildlife, sports, and more advanced photography disciplines.

Summing Up for Specific Photography Genres

• Portraits: Panasonic for sharper images and more lens control.
• Landscapes: Panasonic’s better dynamic range and resolution.
• Wildlife/Sports: Panasonic’s superior zoom, burst, and AF speed.
• Street: Fujifilm’s discreetness and portability win.
• Macro: Panasonic’s close focusing advantage.
• Night/Astro: Panasonic’s manual exposure and higher ISO.
• Video: Panasonic beats decisively with full HD and frame rate options.
• Travel: Fujifilm if ultra-light travel matters; Panasonic if versatility matters.
• Professional Use: Neither supports RAW or advanced workflow; Panasonic edges ahead with manual controls.

The Technical Nitty-Gritty: What You Should Know

• Both rely on small 1/2.3" sensors - don’t expect DSLR-level image quality.
• Panasonic’s CMOS sensor and image processing produce more natural colors and less noise.
• Fujifilm’s CCD sensor produces warmer colors but noisier output in shadows.
• The Panasonic has 23 autofocus points vs. Fuji’s limited system, reflecting real speed differences.
• Panasonic offers standard exposure modes and bracketing, Fujifilm restricts to automatics.
• Battery life on Panasonic is solid (~450 shots); Fuji’s rating is unspecified but shorter.
• No wireless connectivity on either; USB 2.0 only.
• HDMI out is exclusive to Panasonic, useful for tethered viewing.

Conclusion: My Personal Take

Dive into these cameras knowing exactly what you’re getting. The Fujifilm T550 is a no-fuss point-and-shoot with a generous zoom range for its size, best suited for travel or casual photography where size and simplicity matter most. Meanwhile, the Panasonic FZ60 is a real superzoom workhorse brimming with versatile features - the kind of bridge camera that empowered many enthusiasts before mirrorless dominance took over. It’s bulkier and pricier but compensates with greater control, video features, and superior optics.

If you’re on a budget and want the lightest package to capture memories without hassle, go with the Fuji. If you crave creative flexibility, outstanding zoom reach, and serious shooting chops, the Panasonic FZ60 is the more compelling all-around machine.

Whichever you pick, understanding these trade-offs will ensure the right tool in your hands for your photographic adventures.

© 2024 Expert Camera Reviews - Your guide to confident photography gear choices.