Fujifilm XP130 vs Ricoh WG-20: The Ultimate Waterproof Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros

When it comes to rugged, waterproof cameras that can keep up with your adventures - whether you’re hiking, snorkeling, or simply trying to capture life’s candid moments without stressing about weather - the Fujifilm XP130 and Ricoh WG-20 have been steady contenders. Though both cameras cater to the waterproof compact category, their specs, real-world usability, and price points differ enough to merit a full, no-nonsense comparison. Having put both through hands-on testing across multiple photography disciplines and scenarios, I’ll walk you through which one delivers where - and help you decide which makes the most sense for your budget and shooting style.

Let’s dive in!

Size, Handling, and Physical Ergonomics: Compact Survivors in the Wild

First impressions matter; how a camera feels in your hands can impact how many photos you actually take. The XP130 and WG-20 are both designed to survive the rigors of outdoor use, boasting water, dust, shock, and freeze proofing.

The Fujifilm XP130 clocks in at 110mm × 71mm × 28mm and weighs approximately 207 grams. Its ultracompact body fits comfortably in one hand with a nicely contoured grip that provides decent security without bulk. Although it doesn’t have clubs for thumbs or aggressive texturing, it strikes a decent balance between portability and handling for an outdoors camera.

The Ricoh WG-20, by contrast, is a bit smaller and lighter at 114mm × 58mm × 28mm and 164 grams, which might appeal to those who prize minimalism or pack light. Its slimmer profile means less bulk in a jacket pocket or small bag, but the thinner grip sacrifices a bit of security when holding in slippery conditions.

With both cameras designed to withstand drops and submersion (shockproof and waterproof to roughly 10m for the Fuji and 6m for the Ricoh), their build quality is impressive for the price - but I’d give the XP130 a slight edge in overall feel and weather resistance, thanks also to its freezeproofing down to -10°C and dustproofing.

User Interface and Controls: Keeping it Simple in Tough Conditions

A tough outdoor camera isn’t much good unless the controls are accessible - especially when your fingers are cold, wet, or gloved.

Neither the Fuji XP130 nor the WG-20 sports a raw exposure dial or customizable function buttons, reflecting their entry-level waterproof roles. Both rely on a handful of buttons and a fixed-function mode wheel around a modest LCD screen for menu navigation.

The XP130’s control layout is a bit cleaner - buttons are spaced for glove-friendly operation, and their tactile feedback is reassuring. The control wheel at top, with quick access to exposure modes like Program, Scene, and Panorama, makes switching shooting styles relatively smooth.

The WG-20, meanwhile, rides on simpler controls with fewer dedicated buttons and a more utilitarian feel. Menus can feel mildly clunky navigating the smaller 2.7-inch screen. There’s also no touchscreen on either, which is expected at this price but worth noting for real-time focusing tweaks.

Speaking of screens…

LCD Screen and Live View: A Window into Your Shot

Image framing and review hinge heavily on screen quality, especially since neither camera has an electronic viewfinder.

The XP130 sports a crisp 3-inch fixed LCD panel with 920k-dot resolution, appreciably sharper than the WG-20’s 2.7-inch 230k-dot TFT screen. This difference is not trivial. On bright sunny days or underwater, the Fujifilm's higher resolution plus better contrast and color fidelity provide a distinctly easier time composing and reviewing shots. The WG-20’s dimmer, lower-res screen often felt washed out in real-world outdoor tests, forcing me to rely more on guesswork for framing.

Neither screen supports touch input or live histogram overlays, nudging serious shooters to review images post-capture rather than in framing. But for quick client or social media previews in the field, the XP130 is clearly ahead.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At the core of any camera is the sensor, shaping color rendition, noise levels, and dynamic range. Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor type, common in this class, but the technology and resolution differences matter.

The Fujifilm XP130 uses a 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor, a more modern design optimizing light gathering and noise control. Its sensitivity tops out at ISO 3200 (expandable to 6400), a modest but usable range enabling reasonable low-light performance for snapshots. The XP130 also applies a physical anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré at the cost of slightly softer microcontrast.

Ricoh’s WG-20 leans on a 14MP CCD sensor, an older generation sensor technology known for vivid colors but generally higher noise and limited dynamic range, especially beyond ISO 800. Though it technically supports ISO 6400, noise levels at that setting become unmanageable. The CCD also consumes more power, which explains the WG-20’s marginally better battery life despite a smaller body.

In controlled studio tests, the XP130’s sensor edges out the WG-20 in both dynamic range and color depth, producing files with richer tones and more shadow detail, especially in challenging backlit or high contrast scenarios.

Autofocus and Speed: Catching That Decisive Moment

For any enthusiast, autofocus accuracy and speed are essential, whether shooting fast wildlife, sports, or casual street scenes.

Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus systems - standard for compacts - but the Fujifilm XP130’s more recent tech results in a smoother, noticeably faster AF acquisition and better continuous tracking in live view.

The XP130 supports face detection and basic AF tracking, helping with portraits and moving subjects, while the WG-20’s nine-point AF and center-weighted metering feel more rudimentary. Burst shooting on Fujifilm is a respectable 10fps, good for action snaps; Ricoh maxes out at just 1fps, which is sluggish if you’re aiming for multiple continuous shots.

Neither offers phase detection or advanced tracking modes, so neither is fit for professional sports or wildlife photography - but between the two, XP130’s AF system is the more reliable all-rounder.

Lens Performance: Fixed, But Versatile Zoom Ranges

A 28-140mm equivalent zoom range in both lenses makes these cameras pretty similar on paper. Macro capabilities, however, offer contrasting outcomes.

Ricoh WG-20 shines with a macro focus range down to 1cm, enabling close-up shots of insects, flowers, and textures with emphasis. The fine details captured by its CCD sensor pair well with this feature.

Meanwhile, Fujifilm XP130’s macro is rated at 9cm, quite a bit less forgiving for ultra-close work, though it benefits from sharper overall image output and sensor-shift image stabilization to prevent blur.

The optical performance of these fixed lenses is typical for compact zooms: moderate sharpness on the wide end, softness creeping in at telephoto lengths, and moderate chromatic aberration. Neither has aperture priority or manual exposure modes, so creative control over depth of field is somewhat limited.

Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Crisp on the Move

The XP130 is equipped with sensor-shift image stabilization, physically compensating for camera shake regardless of the attached lens (though here it’s fixed). This helps handheld shots at slower shutter speeds and makes video footage more watchable.

The WG-20 uses digital image stabilization, which digitally crops and processes the scene to reduce shake effects. This results in softer overall images and less effective correction in low light or motion. In practical field tests, the Fujifilm’s stabilization kept handheld shots sharper in dim conditions, especially at the telephoto end.

Video Capabilities: Not Hollywood, But Good Enough for Memories

Video specs showcase clear difference in ambition between the pair.

• Fujifilm XP130: Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps using H.264 compression and Linear PCM audio. This results in smooth, sharp footage suitable for casual video and vlogging. The in-body stabilization also enhances handheld video.

• Ricoh WG-20: Limited to 1280x720 (HD) at 30fps max using Motion JPEG format, an older codec producing bulky files and lower quality footage. Audio options are basic; no external mic input on either camera.

Neither supports 4K, slow-motion, or advanced video controls like manual focus or exposure, so video enthusiasts might feel constrained. But for casual clips of adventures, the XP130’s video is a clear winner.

Battery Life and Storage: Endurance for the Expedition

The WG-20 offers a slightly longer battery rating (approx. 260 shots per charge) versus 240 shots on the XP130. While not a vast difference, it could matter for day-long excursions without charging options.

Both cameras share similar storage options: internal memory plus a single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot. The flexibility here is standard fare for compacts.

USB 2.0 connectivity is available on both, though neither offers high-speed charging or fast file transfer - something to note if you’re moving large batches of photos in the field.

The XP130 also integrates Bluetooth wireless, simplifying image transfer to smartphones - an increasingly important feature for social media sharing on-the-go. The WG-20 lacks any wireless connectivity, so you’re tied to cables or card readers.

Waterproof and Toughness: How Deep and How Rough?

Both models promote ruggedness, but they do differ slightly in environmental sealing:

The XP130 clearly offers superior waterproofing (double the depth capability) and dustproofing, which makes it a better choice for beach, diving, or dusty hiking environments.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Let’s put these specs into practice along key photography types to better visualize strengths and weaknesses.

Portrait Photography

Portraits favor accurate skin tones, good bokeh, and face/eye detection autofocus.

• XP130: The 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor renders colors quite naturally, helped by Fuji’s color science legacy. Face detection AF works reasonably well for casual portraits, and sensor-shift stabilization aids in keeping images sharp. However, fixed aperture and small sensor limit shallow depth-of-field bokeh.

• WG-20: Tends to produce punchier but less subtle colors due to CCD sensor. Its macro mode allows some creative close-ups, but face detection is less reliable. Overall, portraits look less polished.

Landscape Photography

Key factors: resolution, dynamic range, weather sealing.

• XP130: Offers better dynamic range from sensor tech, richer color gradation, and true dustproofing improves reliability outdoors. 16MP resolution supports decent prints.

• WG-20: Lower resolution and CCD dynamic limitations reduce detail and tonal range. Lacking dustproof makes it less all-weather-friendly.

Wildlife Photography

Here we need quick autofocus, fast burst rates, and telephoto reach.

• XP130: 10fps burst capable, reliable continuous AF tracking, and sensor-shift stabilization for handheld shots.

• WG-20: 1fps burst kills chances of catching action; autofocus lags a bit, better suited for still subjects.

Sports Photography

Similar needs as wildlife: speed and accuracy.

XP130’s 10fps burst combined with decent AF tracking edge out WG-20, which struggles with lag and lack of frames-per-second speed.

Street Photography

Discretion, portability, and responsiveness count.

WG-20’s lighter weight and smaller grip may appeal to street shooters prioritizing unnoticed snapping. But XP130’s better AF and screen clarity give better results overall.

Macro Photography

Macro range and focusing precision matter most.

WG-20’s 1cm macro is impressive, enabling tight close-ups that Fujifilm’s 9cm minimum can’t match.

Night/Astro Photography

High ISO performance and stable exposures critical.

XP130’s BSI-CMOS sensor and max ISO 3200 deliver cleaner images. WG-20’s CCD noise spikes above ISO 800.

Video Capabilities

XP130 is a better video shooter with 1080p60 and stabilization. WG-20’s 720p max and digital IS feel outdated.

Travel Photography

Versatility, weight, battery life, and connectivity.

XP130 offers better connectivity (Bluetooth), better waterproofing, and more versatile video, though WG-20 is lighter and slightly more battery efficient.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera supports RAW output - limiting post-processing latitude for pros. Both shoot JPEG-only.

XP130 edges out with richer JPEG rendition. Neither integrates well into demanding professional pipelines but serve as rugged secondary cameras nicely.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Fujifilm XP130 front Fujifilm XP130 screen back Ricoh WG 20 front Ricoh WG 20 screen back

Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Analysis

Here’s a synthesized view of how these two cameras score across overall and genre-specific categories based on hands-on tests and customer reports:

Notably, the XP130 outperforms in image quality, burst speed, and video, while WG-20 rates higher for macro and lightweight travel portability.

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Fujifilm XP130 if you:

• Want a rugged camera with better image quality and low light performance
• Plan to capture action or sports with faster burst shooting
• Need better video specs and in-body stabilization
• Shoot in harsher environments needing dustproofing and deeper waterproofing
• Have a limited budget and want the best bang for your waterproof buck

Opt for the Ricoh WG-20 if you:

• Prioritize ultra-close macro photography and tight focusing distances
• Want a compact, lightweight camera for casual travel and street photography
• Are okay sacrificing speed and video quality for simpler operation
• Can afford the higher price (though arguably the value proposition is weaker here)
• Don’t require wireless connectivity or advanced video features

Final Thoughts: Which Tough Camera Wins?

Having used both in variegated environments - from coastal hikes to urban street walks and casual poolside shoots - the Fujifilm XP130 emerges as the more versatile, better-rounded option for most photography enthusiasts and modest pros looking for a reliable waterproof companion.

Its sharper sensor, faster autofocus, superior burst mode, stronger video specs, and enhanced durability set it apart at under half the WG-20’s price at the time of testing. The Ricoh WG-20, while flashy on paper for macro and slightly longer battery life, feels hampered by outdated sensor tech, slow responsiveness, and lesser overall ruggedness.

With that said, neither camera will replace a dedicated mirrorless or DSLR for demanding pro work - nor do they aspire to. They are useful second bodies or adventure cameras where ruggedness and simple operation are vital. For those needs, the XP130 is my call.

I hope this thorough comparison helps you make an informed decision tailored to your photography goals and budget. If ruggedness, image quality, and versatility are key, Fujifilm XP130 earns your trust. If close-focus macro and ultra-portability intrigue you - and you don’t mind the premium price for features you might only occasionally use - the Ricoh WG-20 remains a niche contender.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera adventure be splash-proof and stress-free!

End of Article