Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The FE-4030 was introduced 9 months after the FS42 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FE-4030 grades against the FS42 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4030 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Panasonic FS42
FE-4030 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 9 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus FE-4030
FS42 | FE-4030 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic FS42
FE-4030 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 has got exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-4030 vs the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9205c/9205c20bc0387526ce37d850fe08c044f7add3b6" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c48b9/c48b9cdd2686dab7a70303c6384fe5f618d6d2b9" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The pic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4030 and FS42.
All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4030 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus FE-4030 will offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern FE-4030 provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03dc2/03dc2bd12dc4b7dee20b80bdd8e1a824a855683c" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2846d/2846dcbbe3eff2246084d970ab3a6529e28df7e2" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 146 grams (0.32 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $130 | $580 |