Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony W570
91 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
96 Imaging
38 Features
25 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony W570 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 207g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Announced January 2018
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP120
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 116g - 91 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony W570: An Ultracompact Camera Face-Off with Real-World Insight
When it comes to ultracompact cameras, especially those aimed at casual enthusiasts looking for a pocketable solution, the choices can feel overwhelming. Today, I’m diving deep into two contenders from FujiFilm and Sony - the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 announced in 2018, and the older but still relevant Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 from 2011. Both come with fixed lenses, modest specs, and a friendly price tag, but serve very different user priorities.
Having tested thousands of cameras, with direct hands-on shooting as my main evaluation method, I’m keen to share how these two ultracompacts really stack up - across the broad spectrum of photography types and real-world use scenarios. Let’s see which camera delivers what, and who should consider adding either to their creative toolkit.
Getting a Feel for It: Size, Ergonomics, and Design
Size and comfort often make or break your everyday enjoyment, especially with ultracompact cameras - you want them to be as unobtrusive yet easy to handle as possible.

Fujifilm XP130 (left) versus Sony W570 (right) - size, shape, and grip differences clearly visible.
The Fujifilm XP130 is somewhat thicker but shorter in height (110x71x28mm) and weighs roughly 207g compared to Sony’s skinnier 91x52x19mm and lighter 116g body. Fuji's slightly bigger footprint translates into better ergonomics. It feels more substantial in hand with a decent grip bulge on the front - a relief when shooting outdoors, especially underwater or rugged conditions. The Sony W570, meanwhile, is impressively slim and pocket-ready, but that minimalistic design means a more cramped grip and less comfortable control access.
Physically, XP130's body screams durability, which aligns with its waterproof, shockproof, dustproof, and freezeproof certifications. The Sony W570 has no such robust environmental sealing - making it more vulnerable off the beaten path.
Control Layout and User Interface: Hands-On Operational Efficiency
Comfort goes beyond physical grip; intuitive operation via button placement, dials, and menus matters a lot when you’re chasing shots.

See the XP130’s thoughtfully placed mode dial and dedicated buttons versus the W570’s minimalist, pared-down control scheme.
Fujifilm gives you a definite edge here with a more comprehensive top plate layout - featuring zoom toggle, shutter, on/off, and a mode dial allowing quick access to scene presets, video mode, and advanced settings. The Sony chooses simplicity with minimal buttons, intended for casual shooters who won’t fiddle much beyond zoom and shutter.
Neither camera features a touchscreen, which is a missed opportunity on both, but standard given their price range and vintage.
Sensor and Image Quality: Technical Heart of the Machine
Both cameras sport a 1/2.3-inch sensor, measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm (28.07mm²), but they differ fundamentally in sensor type and processing technology.

While the Sony W570 uses an older CCD sensor, Fuji opts for a BSI-CMOS sensor, which is significantly more efficient in gathering light - a crucial advantage for low-light and dynamic range performance.
Though both have 16 MP resolution (4608 x 3456 max), the CMOS in the Fujifilm XP130 provides better high-ISO noise control, improved color reproduction, and faster performance overall. The CCD in the W570, while fine for bright daylight, falls short as ISO climbs beyond 400, showing pronounced grain and losing detail.
The XP130's max native ISO is 3200, with a boosted mode up to 6400, while Sony caps naturally at 3200 with no ISO boosting. In practical terms, this means Fuji’s camera better handles dusk, indoor shots, and tricky lighting (like street scenes and night photography).
Screen and Live View: Composing Your Shots
In ultracompacts, the rear screen is your viewfinder, so its quality is key. Let’s talk size, resolution, and visibility.

Fujifilm XP130 offers a 3-inch fixed screen with a solid 920K-dot resolution - crisp, bright, and quite usable in daylight. The Sony W570 has a smaller 2.7-inch screen with only 230K dots, resulting in less sharp preview images and difficulty judging fine detail or focus in bright conditions.
Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, which means you’re reliant on the LCD for framing - not ideal for bright outdoor shooting, but expected at this level.
Optical Performance and Lens Capabilities
Let’s zoom in on the fixed lenses - after all, the glass determines much of your image quality and versatility in ultracompacts.
- Fujifilm XP130: 28-140 mm equivalent, 5x zoom, aperture F3.9-4.9
- Sony W570: 25-125 mm equivalent, 5x zoom, aperture F2.6-6.3
Sony’s lens starts off brighter at the wide end with F2.6, great for low light and shallow depth-of-field effects, but its max aperture closes quickly to F6.3 at telephoto, limiting flexibility and speeding autofocus decline.
The Fujifilm, while less bright at wide, maintains a more consistent aperture and slightly longer reach (140 mm vs 125 mm), allowing better telephoto framing especially handy for travel and nature shots.
Macro performance: Sony can focus as close as 5 cm, slightly better than Fuji’s 9cm, letting W570 excel a bit in tight close-up work.
Autofocus System: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Usability
Here’s where the difference in shooting disciplines really shows.
Fujifilm XP130 offers continuous autofocus (AF-C), face detection, center and multi-area AF modes, and even AF tracking. This makes it far more capable for moving subjects - think kids, pets, and casual sports. It also features contrast-detection AF but no phase detection.
The Sony W570 has a more basic contrast-detect AF without continuous focus or tracking, limiting its ability to capture motion and making it slower for spontaneity. It does have 9 focus points, whereas Fuji does not specify focus points in marketing, but focuses more on practical detection methods.
For wildlife, sports, or street photography where quick responsiveness matters, the XP130 has a plus.
Burst Shooting and Frame Rate: Catching the Action
Burst mode performance can be crucial for wildlife, sports, or dynamic street moments.
- Fujifilm XP130 manages up to 10 fps continuous shooting
- Sony W570 is limited to 1 fps burst
Quite a gap, thanks partly to newer sensor technology and processor efficiency in Fuji’s model. For photographers who anticipate action shot needs, XP130 clearly shines.
Weatherproofing and Build Quality: Who Can Go Where?
One huge distinction: the XP130 features true outdoor ruggedness - waterproof up to 15 meters (50ft), dustproof, shockproof from 1.75m drops, and freezeproof to –10°C.
The Sony W570 offers none of these features, built purely as an everyday pocket camera for gentle conditions.
If you’re into hiking, beach days, or adventurous travel photography, the XP130 becomes your obvious companion.
Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Steady
Both cameras have image stabilization but differ in execution:
- Fujifilm: Sensor-shift stabilization system (effective for shake correction)
- Sony: Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the lens
Both help reduce blur in handheld shots, especially at telephoto and slower shutter speeds. Real-world use shows Fuji’s sensor-shift IS to offer slightly better consistency across focal ranges, but Sony’s optical method is also effective. For video, Fuji’s stabilization provides smoother footage overall.
Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Features
Video enthusiasts will notice:
- Fujifilm XP130 records Full HD 1080p at 60fps, MOV format with H.264 compression and Linear PCM audio (no external mic)
- Sony W570 maxes out at 720p 30fps in MPEG-4 format
The XP130 is clearly superior for video - higher resolution, smoother motion with 60fps, and better codec support. Neither offers 4K or external mic ports, so for professional video work outside casual clips, these are limited, but Fuji gives more flexibility.
Connectivity and Power: Staying Powered and Connected
Fujifilm XP130 includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth - modern conveniences for quick photo transfers and wireless sharing via smartphone apps.
Sony W570, being older, only supports Eye-Fi wireless cards and does not have Bluetooth.
Battery life: Fuji’s rated at about 240 shots per charge using its rechargeable battery pack, while Sony's exact battery life is unspecified but generally lower given smaller battery size and age.
Storage Compatibility
Both cameras take SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Sony also supports Memory Stick variants, which are legacy choices less common today.
Real World Results: Images and Sample Shots
Notice the Fuji’s richer colors, better dynamic range, and cleaner low light shots versus Sony’s flatter rendering and visible noise.
In my tests, the XP130 delivered punchier skin tones, a more natural bokeh fade at telephoto, and less digital noise handheld indoors or dusk conditions. The W570 performs well in bright daylight but loses detail and color saturation more quickly in tricky lighting.
Which Camera Excels in Which Photography Genre?
- Portraits: XP130 pulls ahead with face detection AF and more pleasing skin tone reproduction.
- Landscape: Both can shoot decent landscapes, but XP130’s better dynamic range and weather sealing make it ideal outdoors.
- Wildlife: XP130’s faster AF and burst shooting make it a better choice.
- Sports: XP130 wins with 10fps burst and AF tracking.
- Street: W570’s compactness wins for discretion; XP130 better low light capability.
- Macro: Sony’s 5cm macro range has a slight edge.
- Night/Astro: XP130 is the better pick due to BSI-CMOS sensor and higher ISO performance.
- Video: XP130 is unequivocally superior.
- Travel: XP130’s versatility and ruggedness make it great for adventure travel; W570 for casual street travel and everyday use.
- Professional work: Both limited but XP130 offers better integration with workflows given Wi-Fi and better files.
Overall Ratings and Value Assessment
The Fujifilm XP130 surpasses the Sony W570 in most key areas - from ergonomics and build to sensor performance and feature set - despite a slight price premium around $170 versus $160 for the Sony.
Sony’s model is valid if ultimate pocket portability and very casual photography are your only goals, but you’ll trade off core image quality and durability.
Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Ultracompact for Your Needs
To wrap up, here are my tailored recommendations:
-
Choose Fujifilm FinePix XP130 if you want ruggedness, better image/video quality, improved autofocus for active subjects, outdoor reliability, and connectivity features. This camera is your go-to for travel adventure, wildlife, sports snapshots, or anyone wanting a solid, versatile ultracompact that punches above its weight.
-
Choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 if sheer pocketability and affordability with straightforward point-and-shoot simplicity is paramount. It suits casual users unaware or indifferent to environmental conditions, working mostly in good light, who prize sleek design over features.
A Photographer’s Personal Pick
After shooting with both extensively, I find myself reaching more often for the Fujifilm XP130. The rugged build and advanced AF make a world of difference when you’re outdoors and on the move, plus the sensor technology and video improvements significantly extend creative potential.
I do appreciate Sony’s compactness and lens brightness at wide-angle, but overall, XP130 presents a more serious enthusiast camera - and one that’s worth the small extra investment.
If you’re after an ultracompact that’s flexible, capable, and trustworthy in many shooting conditions, Fuji’s XP130 remains a compelling choice years after release. But for simple snapshots and maximum portability at an entry-level price, the Sony W570 keeps a modest charm.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you weigh the practical merits and make the best choice for your photography journey!
For continued updates and sample galleries on these models and more, you can check my video reviews and hands-on testing walkthroughs linked above.
Happy shooting!
Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony W570 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP130 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2018-01-24 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | YesUSB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 207 grams (0.46 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 91 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $171 | $159 |