Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak C140, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") posses different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 4 years after the C140 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the C140 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Kodak EasyShare C140. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak C140
| Fujifilm XP200 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 52 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Fujifilm XP200
| C140 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak C140
| Fujifilm XP200 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak C140 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the C140.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and C140 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and C140.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm XP200 will resolve more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $80 |
