Panasonic GF5 vs Panasonic TS30
89 Imaging
48 Features
54 Overall
50


95 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Panasonic GF5 vs Panasonic TS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF3
- Replacement is Panasonic GF6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT30

Panasonic GF5 vs Panasonic TS30: A Deep Dive into Two Different Worlds of Photography
When choosing a camera, understanding your priorities and how a camera’s features align with them is crucial. Panasonic’s lineup offers everything from versatile mirrorless systems to rugged waterproof compacts designed for adventure. Today, I put the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 (an entry-level mirrorless from 2012) head-to-head against the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 (a waterproof compact introduced in 2015). These two cameras sit at opposite ends of the photographic spectrum, but both have their loyal followings.
After extensive hands-on experience with thousands of cameras across genres, I offer a thorough comparison emphasizing practical performance and real-world usability to help you choose the best fit for your photographic goals.
At a Glance: Styles and Intended Uses
First, note the fundamentally different philosophies these cameras embody.
-
Panasonic GF5: A rangefinder-style mirrorless camera with a Micro Four Thirds mount, aimed at beginners wanting flexibility, decent image quality, and manual controls in a compact form. It’s designed to be your step into serious photography, accommodating interchangeable lenses and standard controls.
-
Panasonic TS30: A ruggedized, waterproof compact with a fixed zoom lens, built for versatility under tough conditions - think beach, hiking, poolside adventures. Simplicity and durability are prioritized over image quality or manual control.
The size comparison above shows the GF5 is deeper and chunkier to accommodate lenses and controls, while the TS30 is sleek and pocketable. This sets the stage for the rest of our evaluation.
Sensor Technology and Core Image Quality
Image quality starts with sensor size and technology, and here, the gulf is stark.
-
GF5: Uses a 17.3 x 13 mm Four Thirds CMOS sensor at 12MP. This sensor size is substantially larger and allows for better light gathering, finer detail, and superior dynamic range than typical compacts.
-
TS30: Equipped with a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor at 16MP. While the resolution is higher, the sensor’s tiny physical size inherently limits image quality, especially in low light or high contrast scenes.
In my experience testing similar sensors, the GF5’s larger sensor yields cleaner images with richer colors and more nuanced tones - especially relevant in challenging lighting. The TS30’s sensor excels in good daylight but struggles considerably as ISO climbs past 400, with visible noise and detail loss.
-
Dynamic Range: The GF5 scores roughly 10 stops on DxOMark metrics - good for entry-level mirrorless - whereas the TS30’s compact sensor offers far less latitude, compressing highlights and crushing shadows more quickly.
-
Color Depth: GF5’s 20.5-bit color depth beats the limited expressiveness of the TS30’s CCD.
For photographers prioritizing image quality - portraiture, landscapes, even travel - the GF5’s sensor is a rock-solid choice. The TS30 is best restricted to casual snapshots or outdoor situations where durability trumps print quality.
Autofocus and Performance Under Pressure
Autofocus (AF) speed, accuracy, and tracking are critical in many photography disciplines - from wildlife to sports to street shooting.
-
GF5: Employs a contrast-detection AF system with 23 focus points, touch-to-focus, face detection, and continuous AF modes. While not cutting-edge by today’s standards, the GF5’s AF is relatively swift and reliable in good light, with decent tracking capabilities.
-
TS30: Also uses contrast-detection autofocus with 23 points but with a more simplified implementation. It has center-weighted AF, face detection, but no manual focus and reduced customization.
I tested both cameras in mixed lighting and found:
-
The GF5 locks focus faster and more accurately, particularly when using face detection or on subjects with low contrast.
-
The TS30’s AF is noticeably slower, especially in low light or on moving subjects. It often hunts visibly, frustrating users trying to capture quick moments.
-
Neither camera supports phase-detection AF or sophisticated tracking found in modern mirrorless bodies.
Results: For action photography - wildlife, sports - the GF5 has a clear edge. The TS30’s AF system favors static scenes or landscapes.
Build Quality, Ergonomics, and Controls
Build quality often determines how a camera feels during extended use - and whether it can withstand real-world conditions.
-
GF5: Solidly built with a plastic body, light but well-constructed. It lacks weather sealing, so avoid harsh rain or dusty environments. The ergonomics favor photographers accustomed to bigger cameras: a thumb rest, mode dial, clear button layout.
-
TS30: As a rugged compact, it features environmental sealing including waterproofing (up to 8m), shockproofing, freeze resistance, and crush resistance. Perfect for adventures, poolside, or hiking.
The GF5’s top controls give you direct access to exposure modes, ISO, and a hot shoe (not available on TS30). The TS30 keeps things minimalistic - fewer buttons, no manual exposure - optimized for ease and ruggedness.
The 3” touchscreen LCD on the GF5 (920k dots) allows straightforward menu navigation and focus selection. In contrast, the TS30 has a smaller, lower-res 2.7" fixed LCD with no touchscreen, limiting usability.
Ergonomically, the GF5 is better suited for those who want to manipulate settings on the fly, while the TS30 demands acceptance of fully automated shooting in exchange for durability.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility
One of the GF5’s best features is its compatibility with Panasonic’s robust Micro Four Thirds lens mount, offering over 100 lenses:
- Primes ranging from ultra-fast 20mm f/1.7 to versatile portraits and macros
- Zooms for wildlife, sports, and travel
- Specialty optics like fisheyes and tilt-shift adapters
This lens flexibility enables photographers to build a tailored kit to suit portrait, macro, landscape, or video ambitions.
The TS30, with its fixed 25–100mm f/3.9–5.7 zoom lens (equivalent to 140–560mm on full frame by 5.9x crop factor), is far more limited. While the zoom provides reasonable telephoto reach, the slow aperture means low-light or shallow depth-of-field work is compromised.
For users who want system extensibility, the GF5 shines. The TS30 is a desert island camera - great as an outdoor backup or travel proof shooter but far less adaptable.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Battery endurance and convenient storage are often overlooked but key considerations for real-world use.
-
GF5: Uses a proprietary battery with around 360 shots per charge (CIPA rating). This is decent but you’ll want a spare for all-day shoots. It uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and has a single slot.
-
TS30: Less power-hungry compact offering about 250 shots per charge. It supports SD cards as well as internal memory - a novelty but limited.
While neither camera rivals today’s flagship stamina, the GF5’s better processing power and larger sensor mean the higher battery drain is understandable.
Video Capabilities
Modern cameras juggle stills and moving images, so video features weigh heavily.
-
GF5: Offers Full HD 1080p recording at 60fps (NTSC) or 50fps (PAL) in both AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats. It supports manual exposure modes during video, an advantage for creative control. Lacking a microphone input does limit audio quality tinkering.
-
TS30: Maxes out at 720p HD at 30fps, MPEG-4 format. No manual exposure control or external mic input. It can record time-lapses but the low video specs reflect its casual target market.
If you plan on serious video work, the GF5’s more robust codec support, frame rates, and exposure controls will serve better.
Special Features and Connectivity
Neither camera features wireless connectivity (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC), so file transfers rely on USB or card readers. The GF5 does have HDMI out; the TS30 does not.
The TS30’s standout special features comprise waterproofing and shockproofing, alongside freezeproof capability - ideal for extreme conditions.
The GF5 leans on manual focus, aperture/shutter priority modes, and exposure compensation to provide creative flexibility missing in the TS30’s auto-centric design.
Genre-by-Genre Photography Performance
Now, let’s dive into how each camera performs across photography disciplines, guided by my experiences testing many bodies in these areas.
Photography Genre | Panasonic GF5 | Panasonic TS30 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Excellent skin tones, creamy bokeh with fast lenses, strong face and eye detection for sharper shots | Limited depth of field, softer images, struggles in low light |
Landscape | Good resolution and dynamic range, useful for detailed scenes; no weather sealing limits harsh environments | Moderate detail, waterproofing excels outdoors but dynamic range restricted by sensor |
Wildlife | Decent AF speed with tele lenses; higher burst rate (4 fps) captures action | Slow AF and 1.3 fps burst rate hamper action shots |
Sports | Better tracking with continuous AF; manual exposure control aids adapting to changing light | Poor burst and AF make sports shooting frustrating |
Street | Compact body aids discreet shooting; touch AF speeds operation | Very discrete and rugged but low image quality in dim light limits quality |
Macro | Works well with dedicated macro lenses, stable manual focus options | Macro focusing to 5 cm but limited resolution and control |
Night/Astro | High ISO performance superior; noise more manageable | Struggles past ISO 400; noise and detail degradation harmful |
Video | 1080p60 with manual exposure; no mic input still better for prosumer video | 720p30 limited clip quality; no audio input |
Travel | Versatile lens options and decent battery life; size moderate | Lightweight, waterproof, great travel companion but image quality suffers |
Professional Work | Raw support, manual controls, interchangeable lenses allow workflow integration | No raw, no manual modes, little appeal for professional use |
Real-World Sample Images and Comparison
Seeing is believing. I mixed real-world test images from both cameras, under diverse conditions.
Notice how the GF5 retains more fine detail, smoother gradations in shadow, and richer color saturation. The TS30’s shots are noisier, softer, and somewhat washed out. For portraits, GF5’s background blur helps isolate the subject, whereas the TS30’s deep depth of field keeps backgrounds busy.
Scoring and Value Assessment
Based on technical metrics, usability, and hands-on testing, the cumulative scores reflect the GF5’s superior photographic capabilities but higher cost.
Camera | Overall Score | Price | Verdict |
---|---|---|---|
GF5 | 50/100 | $600 | Best for enthusiasts and beginners serious about learning photography |
TS30 | N/A* | $180 | Best for rugged use, casual snaps, adventurers needing waterproof durability |
*DXOMark has not tested TS30 due to niche sensor and market segment.
Who Should Choose Which?
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix GF5 if:
- You want to actively learn photography fundamentals and expand your creative control.
- Image quality, portrait bokeh, detailed landscapes, and video capabilities matter.
- You are willing to invest in lenses and accessories over time.
- Battery life and ergonomics are important for extended shoots.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix TS30 if:
- Your primary concern is durability - waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof trusted in demanding environments.
- You’ll mostly shoot casual photos and videos without fussing over settings.
- Portability and compactness trump overall image quality.
- Budget is tight, and ruggedness is prioritized over photographic excellence.
Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Two Missions
In summary, putting these two Panasonic cameras side-by-side is an exercise in appreciating tailored design rather than direct competition. The GF5 excels as an accessible mirrorless camera that empowers photographers to explore manual control, sensitive AF, and interchangeable lenses. Its sensor and video capabilities keep it relevant for beginners and enthusiasts alike, even a decade after its launch.
The TS30, conversely, answers a very different call: a no-nonsense, adventure-proof point-and-shoot that offers rugged reliability where typical cameras would falter. While clearly limited in image quality and creative features, it holds its own as a trustworthy companion for outdoor sports, underwater scenes, or kids’ birthday pools.
Choosing between them boils down to purpose: do you want photographic versatility or everyday rugged dependability? Knowing this makes your decision clearer.
Thank you for reading this detailed comparison. I hope my expert insights have illuminated the strengths and tradeoffs so you can pick the best Panasonic camera for your photographic journey. If you have questions or want to discuss specific use cases, feel free to ask.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic GF5 vs Panasonic TS30 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FT30 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-04-05 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 267g (0.59 pounds) | 142g (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 50 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 250 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $600 | $180 |