Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Panasonic FH3
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 157g - 102 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS11

Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Panasonic Lumix FH3: A Detailed Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When choosing a small sensor compact camera, you want one that fits your style, performs reliably in real-world shooting conditions, and offers features that empower your creativity. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR and the Panasonic Lumix FH3 are both compact travel-friendly cameras that claim to deliver solid imaging capabilities with versatile zooms. But how do they truly compare across various photography styles and technical performance? Drawing on extensive hands-on testing experience, I’ll break down the two cameras and guide you in making a confident, informed choice.
First Impressions and Physical Handling
Both cameras are designed with portability in mind, suitable for quick street shots, travel, and casual everyday use. However, their construction and ergonomics show some clear differences.
Feature | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 102 × 60 × 18 | 98 × 55 × 24 |
Weight (grams) | 157 | 165 |
Screen Size (inches) | 3.5 (Touchscreen, TFT) | 2.7 (Non-touch) |
Build Style | Slim, rectangular compact | Slightly chunkier with grip |
The Fujifilm Z1000EXR measures slightly larger but is thinner and lighter, making it an easy fit for pockets. The touchscreen interface adds modern usability for quick adjustments and navigation through menus - something the FH3 lacks. Panasonic balances with a chunkier grip area which can aid stability when zooming or shooting handheld.
From an ergonomic standpoint, if you value a comfortable feel during swift shoots or extended carrying, the Fujifilm’s compactness and touchscreen put it ahead. The FH3’s thicker profile might feel bulkier but could offer a firmer hold for some users.
Control Layout and User Interface
Having control simplicity and responsiveness is crucial to capturing moments seamlessly. Let’s inspect their top-panel designs and button placements.
The Fujifilm’s top design is lean, focusing on minimizing physical controls to maintain its slim form. It forgoes dedicated dials for aperture or shutter priority modes, reflecting its aimed simplicity and point-and-shoot orientation. The touchscreen compensates for fewer physical buttons, letting you quickly switch modes and focus settings on the fly.
In contrast, the Panasonic FH3 features more conventional buttons and a small mode dial, allowing quicker manual changes without diving into menus. For photographers who prefer tactile controls and direct access to settings, FH3 might feel more familiar.
However, neither camera offers manual aperture or shutter priority control, limiting creative exposure adjustments. Both prioritize simplicity over manual exposure flexibility, which is typical for small sensor compacts targeting casual users. If manual modes are crucial, you might look to other cameras.
Sensor, Image Quality, and Low-Light Performance
Imaging sensors and optics define the heart of camera performance. Both models employ 1/2-inch-class sensors, but with different sensor technologies and resolutions.
Specification | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | EXR CMOS (1/2") | CCD (1/2.3") |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.4 × 4.8 (30.72 mm²) | 6.08 × 4.56 (27.72 mm²) |
Resolution (megapixels) | 16 MP | 14 MP |
Native ISO Range | 100 - 3200 | 80 - 6400 |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Image Stabilization Type | Sensor-shift (IN-Body IS) | Optical (Lens-based IS) |
Sensor Technology Explained
The Fujifilm Z1000EXR’s EXR CMOS sensor supports unique pixel binning modes that aim to balance resolution, dynamic range, and low-light sensitivity - a technology Fujifilm branded to combat limitations of small sensors. This theoretically enhances its versatility, especially in challenging lighting.
By contrast, the Panasonic FH3 uses an older CCD sensor, traditionally known for good color reproduction but generally more challenged in high ISO noise control and dynamic range.
Real-World Image Quality
- Resolution & Detail: The Z1000EXR’s 16MP sensor captures slightly more detail than the FH3’s 14MP. In daylight with optimal conditions, photos from both cameras deliver decent sharpness, but Fujifilm shows better retention of fine textures.
- Dynamic Range: Thanks to its EXR sensor, the Fujifilm has an edge in preserving shadow and highlight detail, which is essential for scenes like landscapes and high contrast portraits.
- Low Light: The Panasonic achieves higher maximum native ISO (6400 vs. 3200 on Fujifilm), but noise levels rise sharply. The Z1000EXR’s sensor-shift stabilization compensates with steadier shots at slower shutter speeds, offsetting some low-light limitations.
In practical terms, the Fujifilm Z1000EXR generally produces cleaner images in lower light and better preserves tonal gradations, which can be a decisive factor for night, portrait, and landscape photographers.
LCD Screen and Live View Performance
An important aspect often overlooked is the clarity and responsiveness of the rear screen, especially when a viewfinder is absent.
- Fujifilm Z1000EXR: A large 3.5-inch TFT touchscreen with 460k-dot resolution, offering excellent visibility even outdoors and intuitive control.
- Panasonic FH3: Smaller 2.7-inch, 230k-dot non-touch LCD, which feels cramped and less vibrant under bright conditions.
The Z1000EXR’s display strongly enhances user experience by making framing, focus confirmation, and menu navigation effortless. Panasonic’s display is adequate but behind the times for 2010s standards.
Autofocus Systems in Action
Autofocus (AF) technology performance heavily influences your ability to capture sharp images quickly, especially for action and wildlife photography.
Feature | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | Unknown number, contrast detect | 9 points, contrast detect |
AF Modes | Face Detection, Single/Continuous, Tracking | Single AF |
AF Speed | Fast with good accuracy | Moderate, can hunt in low light |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
AF Tracking | Yes | No |
The Fujifilm is well-equipped with face detection and continuous tracking autofocus, enabling better subject isolation and focus maintenance during movement. This makes it suitable for casual portraits, street photography, and dynamic subjects.
The Panasonic FH3’s simpler AF relies on a modest 9-point contrast detection array and lacks face or tracking capabilities, resulting in slower lock-on and more missed shots in fast-paced settings.
Lens and Zoom Versatility
Both models feature fixed 28-140mm equivalent zoom lenses, providing versatile reach for travel and everyday shooting. However, their aperture ranges differ:
Specification | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Max Aperture at Wide | f/3.9 | f/2.8 |
Max Aperture at Tele | f/4.9 | f/6.9 |
Macro Capability | 9 cm minimum focus distance | 5 cm minimum focus distance |
While Panasonic’s wider f/2.8 aperture at the wide end lets in more light for indoor and low-light shooting, the aperture narrows substantially at telephoto (f/6.9), limiting shallow depth of field and brightness at longer focal lengths.
The Fujifilm maintains a modest but more consistent aperture across the zoom, supporting better overall image quality and more controlled bokeh at telephoto range. The minimum focusing distance also favors Panasonic for close-up macro work by a few centimeters.
Flash and Low Light Situations
- Fujifilm Z1000EXR: Built-in flash with a 3.7-meter range (wide) plus Red-Eye and Slow-Sync modes enhances fill lighting flexibility. Sensor-shift stabilization improves handheld low light shooting.
- Panasonic FH3: Longer flash range (6.8 meters) with Auto, Red-Eye, and Slow Sync modes. Optical stabilization aids in reducing blur.
The Z1000EXR’s flash system suits closer subjects and offers subtle exposure blending with Slow Sync. Panasonic’s brighter flash reaches farther but may result in harsher light due to smaller aperture and sensor limitations.
Video Capabilities
Video is often a second or even primary function of compact cameras today, making this a critical comparison area.
Specification | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 30fps | HD 1280x720 @ 30fps |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilizer | Optical IS |
You gain a clear advantage with the Fujifilm Z1000EXR’s full HD capability and modern H.264 compression, which results in better video quality and smaller file sizes. The 3.5-inch touchscreen aids video framing and control.
The Panasonic FH3 shoots lower resolution video with older MJPEG compression, leading to larger files and less efficient recording. Neither model has external audio inputs, limiting sound recording options.
Battery Life and Connectivity
Given their size, battery longevity and connectivity options impact usability.
- Fujifilm Z1000EXR: Around 220 shots per charge, uses the NP-45A battery pack, includes built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi).
- Panasonic FH3: No official battery life rating available, uses proprietary batteries, no wireless connectivity.
Wireless options on the Fujifilm allow effortless photo transfers and remote shutter control via compatible devices - ideal for social media users and casual sharing on the go. Panasonic’s lack hurts convenience.
Specialty Photography Use Cases
Let’s explore how each camera fares in specific photography disciplines based on hands-on analysis and sensor capabilities.
Photography Type | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Superior skin tone rendering, face detection, smooth bokeh at telephoto | Limited depth of field, lacking face detection |
Landscapes | Better dynamic range, higher resolution, stable handheld shooting due to sensor-shift IS | Lower dynamic range, smaller screen hampers composition |
Wildlife | Faster autofocus with tracking, 11 fps continuous shooting | Slower autofocus, max 6 fps burst |
Sports | Continuous AF, high burst rate assist capturing quick action | Lower burst, no AF tracking |
Street | Compact form factor, silent and fast shooting with touchscreen control | Slightly bulkier, less discreet, slower autofocus |
Macro | Good close focus, 9 cm working distance | Closer focus (5 cm), slightly better macro images |
Night/Astro | Effective high ISO up to 3200, sensor-shift IS for exposure | Higher ISO 6400 but noisy, less effective stabilization |
Travel | Lightweight, long focal range, Wi-Fi sharing | Less compact, no wireless, basic zoom and controls |
Professional Use | Limited manual modes, no RAW output, not ideal for high end work | Same AWS limitations, no RAW, limited controls |
Image Sample Comparisons: See the Difference Yourself
Examining real images taken under identical conditions reveals their characteristics. The Fujifilm generally produces cleaner, sharper photos with natural colors and better highlight management. Panasonic images look slightly softer with less detail but fare well in bright outdoor scenes.
Note the smoother transitions, retained shadow detail, and more natural skin tones from Fujifilm shots, especially in portraits and street scenes.
Final Performance Scores and Ratings
The Fujifilm Z1000EXR holds an advantage in overall score, edging out Panasonic owing to its sensor technology, autofocus sophistication, display quality, and video capabilities.
Breaking it down by photographic genre:
You can see the Fujifilm excels in portraits, sports, and night photography, while the Panasonic remains competitive in macro and some bright daylight circumstances.
Summary Table: Key Advantages and Drawbacks
Aspect | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix FH3 |
---|---|---|
Strengths | - EXR sensor with expanded dynamic range - 3.5" touchscreen - In-body IS - Full HD video - Fast AF & burst rate - Wi-Fi connectivity |
- Wider aperture at wide end - Slightly better macro focus distance - Longer flash range |
Weaknesses | - Limited manual exposure modes - No RAW support - Battery life moderate |
- Smaller, lower-res screen - No face detection or AF tracking - Lower video resolution - No wireless - Slower burst rate |
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose Fujifilm Z1000EXR if you:
- Crave sharper images with better dynamic range for portraits, landscapes, and low-light scenarios.
- Expect to shoot quick-moving subjects, needing reliable autofocus tracking and rapid continuous shots.
- Want touchscreen convenience and wireless sharing on the go.
- Value higher resolution Full HD video with modern codecs.
- Appreciate a compact, ergonomic body with in-body stabilization.
Choose Panasonic Lumix FH3 if you:
- Need a budget-friendly compact with very simple operation.
- Shoot more macro subjects or prefer a slightly wider aperture at the wide focal length.
- Don't mind basic video and photo functionality without advanced connectivity.
- Are fine with slower autofocus and fewer features due to simplicity preference.
Final Thoughts
Both the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR and Panasonic Lumix FH3 pack respectable performance into small sensor compacts tailored for casual shooters and enthusiasts alike. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR offers a more modern sensor, superior autofocus, and excellent image quality that pushes it ahead as a versatile travel and street camera with solid video features. The Panasonic FH3 provides decent photographic basics with some strength in macro and bright light but falls short in responsiveness and advanced features.
If your creative ambitions extend to portraits, landscapes, sports, or night photography, the Fujifilm is your clearer choice - especially given its performance-driven innovations like EXR sensor technology and in-body stabilization. For those who want simplicity without fuss and are willing to trade some image quality and responsiveness, Panasonic presents a modest alternative.
Getting the Most Out of Your Compact Camera
Once you pick your camera, explore accessories like spare batteries, microSD cards, and portable chargers to extend shooting time. Try out wrist straps or small camera bags to improve carry comfort. For the Fujifilm, leverage its Wi-Fi connectivity to instantly share your journey on social media or control the camera remotely.
Practice with autofocus modes and face detection features on the Fujifilm for portraits and street shots. Experiment with macro focusing distances on Panasonic to capture intricate details. Shoot different lighting conditions to understand each camera’s limits and strengths.
Wrapping Up
Choosing the right small sensor compact sets the foundation for ease, fun, and quality in your photography. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Panasonic Lumix FH3 offer contrasting experiences, but both invite exploration. With this detailed comparison, you can confidently find the camera that fits your photography style, budget, and creative goals.
Ready to take the next step? Check out these cameras in-store or online, read user feedback, and if possible, handle them yourself to see which feels best in your hands. Photography is a journey, and the right gear supports you every step of the way.
Happy shooting!
If you would like personalized recommendations based on your specific photography preferences or need help selecting lenses and accessories, feel free to reach out. Our experience is here to empower your creative vision.
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 30 cm–3.0 m / Tele: 1.0m–2.1 m) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 157 grams (0.35 lbs) | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $160 |