Fujifilm Z300 vs Sony WX1

The following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm Z300 versus Sony WX1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z300 (10MP) and the WX1 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm Z300 (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm Z300 was manufactured within a month of the WX1 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm Z300 scores versus the WX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z300 Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z300 features outside measurements of 92mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony WX1 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm Z300 versus Sony WX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z300 and the WX1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z300 and WX1 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z300 and WX1.

As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z300 has got the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler.