Fujifilm Z33WP vs Leica V-Lux 30
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
90 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Leica V-Lux 30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 43mm
- Introduced May 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Beyond the Specs: A Hands-On Comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP and Leica V-Lux 30
When it comes to compact cameras, the options run a wide gamut, from rugged waterproof models to versatile superzooms. Today, I've lined up a thorough comparison between two interesting entries from slightly different eras and categories: the Fujifilm Z33WP, a 2009 rugged waterproof compact, and the Leica V-Lux 30, a 2011 small sensor superzoom with much higher versatility. With over a decade of photography equipment testing under my belt, I’m diving beyond the bullet points to bring you practical insights drawn from hands-on experience with cameras in this class.
If you’re curious how these two stack up across different photographic genres and real-world scenarios, or whether the Leica’s premium price tag justifies itself against the Fuji’s budget-friendly ruggedness – this article is crafted precisely for you.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Physical design lays the foundation for user experience in the field. The Fujifilm Z33WP comes across as a tiny, tough little warrior. Its fully waterproof design makes it a dependable companion for wet environments, beach trips, or poolside documentation. The Leica V-Lux 30, meanwhile, looks more like a traditional compact superzoom, bigger and heavier, but with that unmistakable Leica build quality and classic styling.

From my hands-on testing, the Fuji’s compact chassis (92x60x21 mm, 110 g) fits easily in a jacket pocket or even a life vest pocket if you’re boating. Ergonomics are minimal but intuitive; the fixed lens and limited buttons keep things simple, which I appreciated when shooting underwater or with gloves on.
The Leica (105x58x43 mm, 219 g) commands more presence. It feels solid and reassuring - a typical Leica hallmark. Its enlarged grip and more extensive control layout offer notable advantages for extended handheld shooting. However, you will likely need a dedicated bag or strap for prolonged carry, which may impact spontaneous street or travel photography.
Overall, while the Z33WP excels in portability and protection, the V-Lux 30 steps up comfort and handling for more demanding photography sessions.
Control Layout and User Interface: Simplicity vs. Sophistication
Leveraging the physical dimensions to their fullest, control arrangements make all the difference in camera responsiveness. While the Fuji keeps things straightforward, the Leica provides more nuanced control options.

The Fujifilm Z33WP offers minimal buttons - no aperture or shutter priority, no exposure compensation, no manual focus. It’s designed so that you can point and shoot with limited distractions. The absence of a viewfinder or even a tilting screen channels interaction mostly through the rear fixed 2.7-inch screen (more on that below).
The Leica V-Lux 30 adopts a classic button-oriented interface with a decent-sized 3-inch fixed LCD and an intuitive menu system powered by the Venus Engine FHD processor. Aperture priority, shutter priority, manual exposure, exposure compensation, and customizable white balance all make an appearance. The touch-enabled screen adds flair, albeit a bit of a novelty given the compact category constraints.
In my experience, the Leica’s finer control network benefits photographers stepping beyond casual snaps toward creative, controlled image-making, something limited by Fuji’s barebones design.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Core Difference
Diving into the heart of image quality, both cameras utilize 1/2.3" sensors - small by today’s standards, but typical for their categories. However, differences in resolution, sensor technology, and processing shape their photographic output considerably.

The Fujifilm employs a CCD sensor with 10 megapixels, aiming for clean output but limited by dated technology. The maximum native ISO caps at 1600, with no RAW support or advanced noise reduction features. Images have modest dynamic range, limited color depth, and noticeable noise when pushed beyond ISO 400 in my testing.
By contrast, the Leica uses a more modern CMOS sensor delivering 14 megapixels with a broader ISO range (80-6400 native). Despite the small sensor size similarity, the Venus Engine FHD processor enhances noise handling and dynamic range through improved in-camera processing.
For landscape and travel photography, this translates into richer colors, better shadow recovery, and cleaner images in the Leica samples. The Fuji’s output, while acceptable for casual sharing, feels constrained for fine art or professional applications.
LCD Screen and Interface: Breaking It Down
The rear display is your direct visual interface and plays a major role in framing and reviewing shots.

The Z33WP’s 2.7" LCD offers 230k dots resolution, which suffices for quick checks but lacks sharpness and brightness, particularly in strong daylight. Its fixed, non-touch design limits interactivity.
Leica’s V-Lux 30 steps up with a 3" 460k dot screen with touch functionality. The higher resolution significantly aids critical focusing and image evaluation in the field. Touch focus and menu navigation (despite some delays) contribute to user-friendliness, especially beneficial for beginners stepping up their game.
If you often shoot outdoors or need immediate, detailed image review, the Leica’s screen offers a clear advantage.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Versatility
Auto-focusing capabilities are where the cameras diverge sharply, reflecting their design intents.
The Fujifilm Z33WP uses contrast-detection AF with a single focus mode and no tracking or face detection. Autofocus speed is generally slow - around one second or longer under low light - and accuracy can be inconsistent, requiring patience with moving subjects.
Leica’s V-Lux 30 also relies on contrast-detection AF but implements 11 focus points, face-detection, continuous autofocus, and tracking. In practice, I found this setup more responsive and reliable, capable of following runners or wildlife with relative ease. The burst shooting speed of 10fps complements this for action sequences.
For photographing wildlife, sports, or dynamic scenarios, Leica’s autofocus system is far more capable. The Fuji is best suited to static subjects and relaxed casual shooting.
Lens and Zoom Reach: Flexibility in Frame Composition
Lens versatility can shape the breadth of your photographic exploration.
- Fujifilm Z33WP: Fixed 35-105mm equivalent zoom, 3x optical zoom, aperture F3.7-4.2.
- Leica V-Lux 30: Fixed 24-384mm equivalent, a whopping 16x optical zoom, aperture F3.3-5.9.
This gives the Leica a breathtaking reach for everything from wide landscapes to distant subjects. The macro focusing distance is slightly better too (3cm vs. Fuji’s 8cm), enabling more creative close-up shots.
Optical image stabilization in the Leica further supports handholding at long focal lengths, whereas the Fuji lacks any form of stabilization, which can prove challenging in low light or telephoto framing.
If you crave a compact with far-reaching zoom capability for travel, wildlife, or sports, the V-Lux 30 stands out hands down.
Special Features: Waterproofing vs. Enhancements
Each model brings unique strengths tied to its target market.
The Fujifilm Z33WP is fully waterproof - capable of immersion (exact specifications consistent with waterproof design), making it your go-to underwater or beach camera safe from splashes and rain. It boasts an internal flash with multiple modes, including slow sync for creative night photography, and a shutter speed range of 8 to 1/2000 seconds.
The Leica V-Lux 30 focuses less on ruggedness and more on imaging features: optical image stabilization, custom white balance, exposure compensation, and a built-in GPS for geotagging. This latter feature is a boon for travel shooters seeking to catalog locations precisely.
There’s a trade-off: if your adventures frequently take you into wet or rough environments, the Fujifilm’s sealed body is invaluable. Otherwise, the Leica offers richer photographic options.
Video Capabilities: From Basic to Full HD
If video is on your radar, the two models cater to very different expectations.
The Fujifilm Z33WP records in 640x480 VGA at 30fps using Motion JPEG format - functional for casual recording but disappointing by modern standards. No microphone port or advanced recording options restrict creative control.
Leica’s V-Lux 30 offers 1920x1080 Full HD video at 60fps, giving smooth motion and higher resolution. Supported formats include MPEG-4 and AVCHD, suitable for editing workflows. Touch AF during video recording offers smooth focus transitions, although no external microphone input limits audio quality enhancement.
Practically speaking, the Leica suits casual videographers and hybrid shooters better, while the Fuji suffices for simple movie moments.
Battery Life and Storage
Longevity on a single charge matters greatly when shooting on location.
The Leica V-Lux 30 boasts an official battery life of around 260 shots per charge, powered by a proprietary lithium-ion pack - adequate for a day’s usage but requiring spares for extended shoots.
The Fujifilm Z33WP’s battery life is unspecified but, from practice, it’s close to 200 shots per charge with its NP-45 battery, balanced by low power use from the simpler electronics.
Both employ a single SD/SDHC slot with internal memory for emergency storage.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera supports wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth - fairly standard omissions for their production timeframes. Both have HDMI output and USB 2.0 for data transfer.
The Leica includes built-in GPS, which is rare and useful for geo-tagging your photos automatically - a valuable feature for travel photographers and archivists.
Sample Images: Real-World Shooting Results
Enough technical talk - how do these cameras stack up in actual image quality?
Here you can observe Fujifilm’s output showing muted colors and softer details especially in low light, with visible noise creeping in past ISO 400. Its lens produces decent bokeh but limited by focal length and aperture constraints.
Leica’s shots reveal sharper details, richer tonality, and wider dynamic range. The extended zoom shows little degradation at longer focal lengths, aided by optical image stabilization.
In portrait shots, Leica’s better color rendering and autofocus precision capture more natural skin tones and crisp eyes. Meanwhile, Fuji Z33WP’s fixed lens and basic AF limit portrait expressiveness.
Performance Ratings: Overall and by Photography Genre
An objective device rating puts all factors into perspective.
- Fujifilm Z33WP: Scores solidly on waterproofing and compactness but trails in image quality, autofocus, and video.
- Leica V-Lux 30: Excels for image quality, lens versatility, and controls but lacks environmental sealing.
Breaking it down:
- Portrait: Leica wins due to AF and color rendering.
- Landscape: Leica’s resolution and dynamic range shine.
- Wildlife/Sports: Leica’s zoom and burst shooting prevail.
- Street: Fuji’s small size has some advantage but limited by slow AF.
- Macro: Leica’s closer focusing and stabilization make it better.
- Night/Astro: Neither ideal - Leica’s higher ISO helps slightly.
- Video: Leica handily outperforms.
- Travel: Leica’s zoom and GPS tip the scale; Fuji’s ruggedness aids in tough conditions.
- Professional: Leica suits critical work with more control; Fuji is mostly for casual.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Fujifilm Z33WP if:
- You want a tough, waterproof camera for beach, pool, or rainy weather.
- You prioritize portability and simplicity over features.
- Your photography is casual, snapshot-driven, and low-budget.
- You rarely shoot fast-moving subjects or require manual controls.
Choose the Leica V-Lux 30 if:
- You seek a versatile superzoom with strong image quality for multiple genres.
- You require creative control with aperture/shutter priority and manual modes.
- You want decent Full HD video capabilities.
- Weight and size are not critical constraints.
- You value built-in GPS for organized travel photography.
- Price is less of a concern compared to capabilities.
Final Thoughts: Matching Camera to Your Vision
Both the Fujifilm Z33WP and Leica V-Lux 30 reflect their design philosophies poignantly. The Fuji offers rugged simplicity, easy to carry and worry-free in wet conditions, appealing to casual shooters who want a dependable companion free from fuss. The Leica, while doubling the price, delivers a camera much more capable and flexible, bridging the gap between point-and-shoot convenience and enthusiast ambition.
From my years of experience, I urge photographers to carefully match the camera not just to specs but to how and where you’ll shoot. If your adventures involve water, the Z33WP is hard to beat for peace of mind. If you crave versatility, greater control, and image quality without stepping into interchangeable lens territory, the V-Lux 30 still holds its own remarkably well today.
Hope this detailed breakdown helps you navigate the trade-offs and find the right tool for your photographic journey!
If you want to explore more of my detailed tests or see these cameras in action, check my video review linked above. Meanwhile, happy shooting!
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Leica V-Lux 30 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Leica V-Lux 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Leica |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Leica V-Lux 30 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2011-05-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 219 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 105 x 58 x 43mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $197 | $900 |