Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ed8/e0ed852c676dcf5cca69873fd065bab3f3131ad6" alt="Olympus FE-3010 front Olympus FE-3010 front"
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced April 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and FE-3010 (12MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and FE-3010 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z900EXR was released 2 years later than the FE-3010 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR scores versus the FE-3010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR & Olympus FE-3010. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery & Olympus FE-3010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Olympus FE-3010
Fujifilm Z900EXR | FE-3010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
FE-3010 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Olympus FE-3010
Fujifilm Z900EXR | FE-3010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR enjoys exterior dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-3010 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus the FE-3010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ea/350ea11808948cf88d1a3e19c6f1fc705f80559f" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and FE-3010 is 95 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3116b/3116b80aef258ddac2e38408e3b8f10ab668bc60" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and FE-3010.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z900EXR due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm Z900EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bad8c/bad8cf5be5818329e48588813fc0dcf240f8639c" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ad1e/1ad1ea0ff5a5bb7e5ce2a2dc2665c7347f92e330" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Olympus FE-3010 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Olympus FE-3010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Olympus FE-3010 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-04-05 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 108 gr (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $140 |