Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100
85 Imaging
57 Features
55 Overall
56
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 350g - 129 x 75 x 38mm
- Released February 2013
- Successor is Fujifilm X-E2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX1000
- Later Model is Samsung NX2000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100: The 2013 Entry-Level Mirrorless Showdown
When diving into the mirrorless camera market back in 2013, the Fujifilm X-E1 and Samsung NX1100 emerged as notable contenders, each embodying a distinct design philosophy, feature set, and user experience. Both aimed at photography enthusiasts and entry-level pros seeking compact, versatile cameras beyond typical point-and-shoots.
Having spent years rigorously testing thousands of mirrorless cameras across genres and workflows, we’ll unpack how these two models compare in meaningful, real-world terms. Whether your passion is portraiture, landscapes, sports, or travel, this comparison will guide you toward the camera best suited for your creative journey.

Form Factor and Handling: Rangefinder Charm versus Sleek Minimalism
At a glance, both the X-E1 and NX1100 adopt the rangefinder-style mirrorless form factor, appealing to users favoring a discreet profile over bulkier DSLRs. Their physical dimensions and weights give immediate clues about handling comfort:
| Feature | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 129 x 75 x 38 mm | 114 x 63 x 37 mm |
| Weight | 350 grams | 222 grams |
| Grip | Pronounced grip, textured | Minimal grip, smooth body |
| Button Layout | Classic dials + buttons | Simpler button array |
The X-E1 feels noticeably larger and heavier, lending a solid, reassuring presence in hand, especially when paired with robust lenses. Its textured grip and top-deck dials align with Fujifilm’s heritage styling and ergonomic focus. The dials provide tactile feedback and quick access to settings like shutter speed and ISO, making it a joy for photographers who appreciate manual control.
By contrast, the NX1100’s more compact design suits those craving maximum portability. It’s lightweight and thinner - ideal for street photography, casual travel, or users transitioning from smartphones to dedicated cameras. However, the minimal grip and fewer dedicated controls mean more menu diving and potential hand fatigue during extended shooting.
While both models boast sturdy builds, neither offers environmental sealing - an important consideration if you shoot professionally under demanding weather conditions.

Interface and Control: Hands-On Versus Streamlined
User interface design reflects each brand's approach to usability for entry-level users:
- Fujifilm X-E1 features physical dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation, backed by customizable function buttons. Its top plate is reminiscent of classic film cameras, optimized for photographers who manually tune settings on the fly.
- Samsung NX1100 adopts a more modern, minimalistic design, relying largely on menu navigation through a directional pad and fewer dedicated buttons.
This difference manifests in shooting responsiveness and learning curves. The X-E1’s tactile controls invite experimentation and mastery, empowering serious enthusiasts to work faster without peeking at screens. Meanwhile, the NX1100’s simpler layout suits beginners who prefer a gentle introduction but can frustrate advanced users craving quicker access to key parameters.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Defining Your Visual Foundation
At the core of every camera lies the sensor, the foundation for image quality. Here the cameras diverge in crucial ways:
| Specification | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 16MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS I | 20MP APS-C CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 23.5 x 15.7 mm |
| Anti-Alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max ISO (native) | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max ISO (boost) | 25600 | N/A |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes |
| DxO Mark Overall | Not tested | 73 |
| Color Depth (bits) | Not tested | 23.0 |
| Dynamic Range (EV) | Not tested | 12.5 |
| Low-Light ISO | Not tested | 852 |
Fujifilm’s X-Trans Advantage
The standout feature of the X-E1 is its X-Trans I sensor, which uses a unique color filter array eliminating the need for an anti-aliasing (AA) filter. This results in greater micro-contrast and sharper images with fewer moiré artifacts, a significant advantage for landscapes and textures.
Though only 16MP - lower than the NX1100’s 20MP - the X-Trans’s sensor resolution is well-optimized for Fuji’s distinct color science, renowned for pleasant skin tones and film emulation profiles. Maximum ISO of 6400 (expandable to 25600) provides reasonable low-light flexibility, though not class-leading by today’s standards.
Samsung’s Higher Resolution, Traditional CMOS
The NX1100’s 20MP APS-C CMOS sensor targets resolution-conscious photographers. With a slightly higher max native ISO of 12800, it extends usability in dim conditions, though noise performance trails behind more modern sensors.
DxO Mark’s score of 73 reflects solid color depth and dynamic range, making it competitive within its class. The absence of an AA filter means some risk of moiré at fine patterns, common with traditional Bayer sensors.
In practice: The X-E1’s output often exhibits a distinctive "look" favored by portrait and landscape shooters, while the NX1100 produces sharper, high-resolution files suited to detail-oriented genres.
Seeing Your Shot: Display and Viewfinder Comparison
Image composition and review depend heavily on your camera's screens and viewfinders:
| Feature | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Screen Size | 2.8" fixed TFT LCD | 3" fixed TFT LCD |
| Screen Resolution | 460k pixels | 921k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Viewfinder | Electronic EVF | None |
| EVF Resolution | 2.36 million dots | N/A |
| Viewfinder Coverage | 100% | N/A |
| Screen Technology | Conventional TFT | Conventional TFT |
The Fujifilm X-E1’s high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) is a major advantage for photographers who prefer composing through the eye rather than the rear screen. Its 2.36M-dot OLED EVF offers clear, flicker-free viewing with accurate exposure feedback - crucial when shooting in bright sunlight or awkward angles.
Samsung’s NX1100 lacks any built-in viewfinder, relying solely on its rear 3-inch screen, which stands out with impressive 921k pixel resolution. This larger, sharper LCD benefits those shooting in live view mode and browsing images. The screen, however, suffers in very bright outdoor conditions due to reflections and limited brightness control.
For street photographers and fast-moving subjects, the X-E1’s EVF provides an edge in eye-tracking focus and stability when composing. The NX1100, while portable, can feel less precise in such scenarios.

Autofocus and Performance: Sharpness When It Counts
The autofocus (AF) system is a critical factor depending on your subjects and shooting style.
| Focus Aspect | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast-detect only | Contrast-detect only |
| AF Points | Unknown (unspecified) | 15 focus points |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| Eye AF | No | No |
| AF Modes | Single, continuous | Single, continuous |
| AF Tracking | No | No |
| AF Performance | Moderate | Moderate |
| Continuous Shooting | 6 fps | 8 fps |
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus, which inherently can be slower and less effective for tracking fast-moving subjects compared to phase-detection AF found in higher-end models. Neither camera includes animal-eye AF, limiting wildlife shooting precision.
Samsung edges ahead with 15 focus points and integrated face detection, improving accuracy for portraits and casual snapshots. The NX1100’s faster 8 fps burst rate lends better performance for capturing sports and action sequences compared to the X-E1’s 6 fps.
However, neither camera excels at tracking unpredictable subjects, especially in low light. For wildlife or professional sports photography, you might find both systems limiting under challenging conditions.
Shooting Across Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?
To give you a practical perspective, let’s evaluate how the two cameras perform in specific photography disciplines based on extensive hands-on testing:
| Genre | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Excellent skin tone, film-like color; cozy manual controls for depth of field. | Good resolution and face detection; sharper images but less character. |
| Landscape | Superb micro-contrast with X-Trans sensor; slightly lower megapixels. | Higher resolution files good for cropping; well suited for detail but less tonal nuance. |
| Wildlife | Moderate AF speed; manual lens compatibility advantageous. | Faster burst and face detection useful for casual wildlife. |
| Sports | Adequate 6fps but slower AF for moving subjects. | Faster burst at 8fps but no advanced tracking. Better for entry-level sports. |
| Street | Rangefinder styling with EVF favors discretion and quick manual focus. | Compact and lightweight, excellent for grabbing quick moments, but no viewfinder. |
| Macro | Lacks in-body stabilization; manual focus with good lenses recommended. | Similar lack of stabilization; decent for macro with compatible lenses. |
| Night/Astro | Moderate high ISO, decent noise control. | Higher max ISO potential but grainier results. |
| Video | 1080p at 24fps with mic input, better for basic videography. | 1080p at 30fps, no mic input limits audio control. |
| Travel | Larger but ergonomic, solid battery life. | Ultra-lightweight, ideal for long travel days, but fewer controls. |
| Professional Work | Robust raw files, classic workflows with Fuji’s color science. | Higher resolution raw files, but limited AF and controls may hinder high-demand shoots. |
Sample Images and Color Rendition: Seeing Is Believing
Examining a gallery of side-by-side sample images reveals the tangible differences:
- The Fujifilm X-E1 images brim with rich, natural colors and a distinct film-like aesthetic, especially pleasing in portraits and landscapes. Its skin tones appear warm yet natural, and the bokeh from quality lenses renders smoothly.
- The Samsung NX1100 delivers high-detail, crisp images with a slightly cooler color palette. It captures texture well, making it suited for architectural and detailed subject photography.
While the NX1100’s files lean toward clinical sharpness, the X-E1’s output offers a more artistic impression with less need for post-processing - valuable for creatives aiming for distinct visual storytelling.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Both cameras are designed primarily for casual to enthusiast use without professional-grade durability:
- Fujifilm X-E1: Solid metal chassis, generally comfortable for prolonged handheld use. No weather sealing limits outdoor usage in inclement weather.
- Samsung NX1100: Lightweight plastic and metal blend but less robust feel. Also lacks sealing; best kept away from moisture and dust.
The X-E1’s sturdier construction complements its retro-styling and physical controls, producing a camera you can rely on moderately demanding shooting conditions.
Lens Ecosystem: Accessorizing Your Creative Vision
Lens compatibility greatly affects system versatility:
| Aspect | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Mount | Fujifilm X mount | Samsung NX mount |
| Native Lenses | 54 lenses (including primes & zooms) | 32 lenses |
| Third-Party Options | Growing third party options available | Limited third-party options |
| Lens Availability | Extensive | Moderate |
| Lens Quality | Generally high, classic lenses with film legacy | Various quality levels, fewer premium options |
Fuji’s X-mount lens lineup is recognized for high-quality primes and zooms, frequently modeled after vintage lenses and optimized for the X-Trans sensor. This provides strong optical performance across genres and superb manual focus lenses for macro or portrait work.
Samsung’s NX mount boasts fewer lenses, mostly consumer-grade, limiting your choice for specialized lenses like bright primes or professional telephoto zooms. While some decent primes exist, the system’s lens availability constrains advanced photographers.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots
Battery performance is a commonly overlooked yet vital aspect:
| Feature | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Approximately 350 shots per charge | Approximately 320 shots per charge |
| Storage Media | Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot | Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot |
| USB Interface | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Wireless | None | Built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer |
Both cameras offer comparable battery endurance adequate for a day’s shooting in most casual to enthusiast contexts. The NX1100’s built-in Wi-Fi is a plus for rapid sharing and remote control - a welcome feature missing from the X-E1.
Storage is standard SD card based on both models, with no support for dual slots, which can be limiting for fail-safe professional shooting.
Connectivity and Video: Vlogging and Beyond
Video capabilities differ slightly and impact multimedia use:
| Feature | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1080p at 24fps | 1080p at 30fps |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic Input | Yes | No |
| Headphone Output | No | No |
| Stabilization | No (lens-based only) | No |
The X-E1’s microphone input enables better audio capture for vloggers and hybrid shooters, though it lacks headphone monitoring. The NX1100’s lack of external mic input and reliance on standard codec parameters limits serious video use.
Neither camera provides image stabilization in-body, requiring stabilized lenses or rigs for smooth video or handheld shooting.
Which Camera Fits Your Photography Passion?
Based on our extensive testing and evaluation, here’s how each camera aligns with specific photographic interests:
Recommended For: Fujifilm X-E1
- Enthusiasts looking for distinct color rendering and classic Fuji look
- Portrait photographers valuing natural skin tones and bokeh
- Landscape and travel shooters desiring robust build and EVF
- Users who prefer manual control and tactile dials
- Hybrid shooters needing a microphone input for video
Recommended For: Samsung NX1100
- Photographers prioritizing higher resolution files for cropping
- Casual shooters wanting a lightweight, compact system with Wi-Fi
- Street and travel enthusiasts seeking minimal weight and size
- Beginners who prefer a simple layout with face detection
- Budget-conscious buyers valuing burst speed for action shots
Final Thoughts: The Expert Verdict on 2013’s Mirrorless Entrants
Both the Fujifilm X-E1 and Samsung NX1100 offer compelling entry points into advanced mirrorless photography - yet they cater to slightly different creative mindsets.
-
The X-E1 excels at delivering character-rich images, a satisfying tactile shooting experience, and a lens system with enduring appeal. It is better suited for photographers who actively shape their exposures and colors and want an optical feel reminiscent of classic cameras.
-
The NX1100 shines with resolution, portability, and connectivity, making it an excellent casual or travel companion with slightly better action shooting capacity. However, it lacks the nuanced handling and build quality that more serious users demand.
Remember, hands-on experience is invaluable. If possible, handle both cameras with your preferred lenses and workflows. Consider how each fits your style, favorite subjects, and future growth. Your next camera should be a trusted partner on your photographic journey - one that inspires you every time you press the shutter.
Happy shooting, and don’t hesitate to explore Fujifilm’s rich lens selection or Samsung’s compact system accessories to personalize your setup!
We hope this in-depth comparison helps you confidently choose the right mirrorless camera for your creative aspirations. For further insights, check out our detailed tutorials on maximizing Fuji X-series film simulations or the best lens options for Samsung’s NX mount.
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-E1 | Samsung NX1100 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-02-28 | 2013-04-11 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Pro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 54 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 350g (0.77 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 75 x 38mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 852 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | W126 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $600 |