Clicky

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100

Portability
85
Imaging
57
Features
55
Overall
56
Fujifilm X-E1 front
 
Samsung NX1100 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
60
Overall
60

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-E1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 350g - 129 x 75 x 38mm
  • Released February 2013
  • Successor is Fujifilm X-E2
Samsung NX1100
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Succeeded the Samsung NX1000
  • Later Model is Samsung NX2000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100: The 2013 Entry-Level Mirrorless Showdown

When diving into the mirrorless camera market back in 2013, the Fujifilm X-E1 and Samsung NX1100 emerged as notable contenders, each embodying a distinct design philosophy, feature set, and user experience. Both aimed at photography enthusiasts and entry-level pros seeking compact, versatile cameras beyond typical point-and-shoots.

Having spent years rigorously testing thousands of mirrorless cameras across genres and workflows, we’ll unpack how these two models compare in meaningful, real-world terms. Whether your passion is portraiture, landscapes, sports, or travel, this comparison will guide you toward the camera best suited for your creative journey.

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison

Form Factor and Handling: Rangefinder Charm versus Sleek Minimalism

At a glance, both the X-E1 and NX1100 adopt the rangefinder-style mirrorless form factor, appealing to users favoring a discreet profile over bulkier DSLRs. Their physical dimensions and weights give immediate clues about handling comfort:

Feature Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Dimensions 129 x 75 x 38 mm 114 x 63 x 37 mm
Weight 350 grams 222 grams
Grip Pronounced grip, textured Minimal grip, smooth body
Button Layout Classic dials + buttons Simpler button array

The X-E1 feels noticeably larger and heavier, lending a solid, reassuring presence in hand, especially when paired with robust lenses. Its textured grip and top-deck dials align with Fujifilm’s heritage styling and ergonomic focus. The dials provide tactile feedback and quick access to settings like shutter speed and ISO, making it a joy for photographers who appreciate manual control.

By contrast, the NX1100’s more compact design suits those craving maximum portability. It’s lightweight and thinner - ideal for street photography, casual travel, or users transitioning from smartphones to dedicated cameras. However, the minimal grip and fewer dedicated controls mean more menu diving and potential hand fatigue during extended shooting.

While both models boast sturdy builds, neither offers environmental sealing - an important consideration if you shoot professionally under demanding weather conditions.

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison

Interface and Control: Hands-On Versus Streamlined

User interface design reflects each brand's approach to usability for entry-level users:

  • Fujifilm X-E1 features physical dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation, backed by customizable function buttons. Its top plate is reminiscent of classic film cameras, optimized for photographers who manually tune settings on the fly.
  • Samsung NX1100 adopts a more modern, minimalistic design, relying largely on menu navigation through a directional pad and fewer dedicated buttons.

This difference manifests in shooting responsiveness and learning curves. The X-E1’s tactile controls invite experimentation and mastery, empowering serious enthusiasts to work faster without peeking at screens. Meanwhile, the NX1100’s simpler layout suits beginners who prefer a gentle introduction but can frustrate advanced users craving quicker access to key parameters.

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Defining Your Visual Foundation

At the core of every camera lies the sensor, the foundation for image quality. Here the cameras diverge in crucial ways:

Specification Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Sensor Type 16MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS I 20MP APS-C CMOS
Sensor Size 23.6 x 15.6 mm 23.5 x 15.7 mm
Anti-Alias Filter Yes Yes
Max ISO (native) 6400 12800
Max ISO (boost) 25600 N/A
Raw Support Yes Yes
DxO Mark Overall Not tested 73
Color Depth (bits) Not tested 23.0
Dynamic Range (EV) Not tested 12.5
Low-Light ISO Not tested 852

Fujifilm’s X-Trans Advantage

The standout feature of the X-E1 is its X-Trans I sensor, which uses a unique color filter array eliminating the need for an anti-aliasing (AA) filter. This results in greater micro-contrast and sharper images with fewer moiré artifacts, a significant advantage for landscapes and textures.

Though only 16MP - lower than the NX1100’s 20MP - the X-Trans’s sensor resolution is well-optimized for Fuji’s distinct color science, renowned for pleasant skin tones and film emulation profiles. Maximum ISO of 6400 (expandable to 25600) provides reasonable low-light flexibility, though not class-leading by today’s standards.

Samsung’s Higher Resolution, Traditional CMOS

The NX1100’s 20MP APS-C CMOS sensor targets resolution-conscious photographers. With a slightly higher max native ISO of 12800, it extends usability in dim conditions, though noise performance trails behind more modern sensors.

DxO Mark’s score of 73 reflects solid color depth and dynamic range, making it competitive within its class. The absence of an AA filter means some risk of moiré at fine patterns, common with traditional Bayer sensors.

In practice: The X-E1’s output often exhibits a distinctive "look" favored by portrait and landscape shooters, while the NX1100 produces sharper, high-resolution files suited to detail-oriented genres.

Seeing Your Shot: Display and Viewfinder Comparison

Image composition and review depend heavily on your camera's screens and viewfinders:

Feature Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Rear Screen Size 2.8" fixed TFT LCD 3" fixed TFT LCD
Screen Resolution 460k pixels 921k pixels
Touchscreen No No
Viewfinder Electronic EVF None
EVF Resolution 2.36 million dots N/A
Viewfinder Coverage 100% N/A
Screen Technology Conventional TFT Conventional TFT

The Fujifilm X-E1’s high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) is a major advantage for photographers who prefer composing through the eye rather than the rear screen. Its 2.36M-dot OLED EVF offers clear, flicker-free viewing with accurate exposure feedback - crucial when shooting in bright sunlight or awkward angles.

Samsung’s NX1100 lacks any built-in viewfinder, relying solely on its rear 3-inch screen, which stands out with impressive 921k pixel resolution. This larger, sharper LCD benefits those shooting in live view mode and browsing images. The screen, however, suffers in very bright outdoor conditions due to reflections and limited brightness control.

For street photographers and fast-moving subjects, the X-E1’s EVF provides an edge in eye-tracking focus and stability when composing. The NX1100, while portable, can feel less precise in such scenarios.

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Autofocus and Performance: Sharpness When It Counts

The autofocus (AF) system is a critical factor depending on your subjects and shooting style.

Focus Aspect Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
AF Type Contrast-detect only Contrast-detect only
AF Points Unknown (unspecified) 15 focus points
Face Detection No Yes
Eye AF No No
AF Modes Single, continuous Single, continuous
AF Tracking No No
AF Performance Moderate Moderate
Continuous Shooting 6 fps 8 fps

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus, which inherently can be slower and less effective for tracking fast-moving subjects compared to phase-detection AF found in higher-end models. Neither camera includes animal-eye AF, limiting wildlife shooting precision.

Samsung edges ahead with 15 focus points and integrated face detection, improving accuracy for portraits and casual snapshots. The NX1100’s faster 8 fps burst rate lends better performance for capturing sports and action sequences compared to the X-E1’s 6 fps.

However, neither camera excels at tracking unpredictable subjects, especially in low light. For wildlife or professional sports photography, you might find both systems limiting under challenging conditions.

Shooting Across Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

To give you a practical perspective, let’s evaluate how the two cameras perform in specific photography disciplines based on extensive hands-on testing:

Genre Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Portrait Excellent skin tone, film-like color; cozy manual controls for depth of field. Good resolution and face detection; sharper images but less character.
Landscape Superb micro-contrast with X-Trans sensor; slightly lower megapixels. Higher resolution files good for cropping; well suited for detail but less tonal nuance.
Wildlife Moderate AF speed; manual lens compatibility advantageous. Faster burst and face detection useful for casual wildlife.
Sports Adequate 6fps but slower AF for moving subjects. Faster burst at 8fps but no advanced tracking. Better for entry-level sports.
Street Rangefinder styling with EVF favors discretion and quick manual focus. Compact and lightweight, excellent for grabbing quick moments, but no viewfinder.
Macro Lacks in-body stabilization; manual focus with good lenses recommended. Similar lack of stabilization; decent for macro with compatible lenses.
Night/Astro Moderate high ISO, decent noise control. Higher max ISO potential but grainier results.
Video 1080p at 24fps with mic input, better for basic videography. 1080p at 30fps, no mic input limits audio control.
Travel Larger but ergonomic, solid battery life. Ultra-lightweight, ideal for long travel days, but fewer controls.
Professional Work Robust raw files, classic workflows with Fuji’s color science. Higher resolution raw files, but limited AF and controls may hinder high-demand shoots.

Sample Images and Color Rendition: Seeing Is Believing

Examining a gallery of side-by-side sample images reveals the tangible differences:

  • The Fujifilm X-E1 images brim with rich, natural colors and a distinct film-like aesthetic, especially pleasing in portraits and landscapes. Its skin tones appear warm yet natural, and the bokeh from quality lenses renders smoothly.
  • The Samsung NX1100 delivers high-detail, crisp images with a slightly cooler color palette. It captures texture well, making it suited for architectural and detailed subject photography.

While the NX1100’s files lean toward clinical sharpness, the X-E1’s output offers a more artistic impression with less need for post-processing - valuable for creatives aiming for distinct visual storytelling.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Both cameras are designed primarily for casual to enthusiast use without professional-grade durability:

  • Fujifilm X-E1: Solid metal chassis, generally comfortable for prolonged handheld use. No weather sealing limits outdoor usage in inclement weather.
  • Samsung NX1100: Lightweight plastic and metal blend but less robust feel. Also lacks sealing; best kept away from moisture and dust.

The X-E1’s sturdier construction complements its retro-styling and physical controls, producing a camera you can rely on moderately demanding shooting conditions.

Lens Ecosystem: Accessorizing Your Creative Vision

Lens compatibility greatly affects system versatility:

Aspect Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Lens Mount Fujifilm X mount Samsung NX mount
Native Lenses 54 lenses (including primes & zooms) 32 lenses
Third-Party Options Growing third party options available Limited third-party options
Lens Availability Extensive Moderate
Lens Quality Generally high, classic lenses with film legacy Various quality levels, fewer premium options

Fuji’s X-mount lens lineup is recognized for high-quality primes and zooms, frequently modeled after vintage lenses and optimized for the X-Trans sensor. This provides strong optical performance across genres and superb manual focus lenses for macro or portrait work.

Samsung’s NX mount boasts fewer lenses, mostly consumer-grade, limiting your choice for specialized lenses like bright primes or professional telephoto zooms. While some decent primes exist, the system’s lens availability constrains advanced photographers.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots

Battery performance is a commonly overlooked yet vital aspect:

Feature Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Battery Life Approximately 350 shots per charge Approximately 320 shots per charge
Storage Media Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot
USB Interface USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Wireless None Built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer

Both cameras offer comparable battery endurance adequate for a day’s shooting in most casual to enthusiast contexts. The NX1100’s built-in Wi-Fi is a plus for rapid sharing and remote control - a welcome feature missing from the X-E1.

Storage is standard SD card based on both models, with no support for dual slots, which can be limiting for fail-safe professional shooting.

Connectivity and Video: Vlogging and Beyond

Video capabilities differ slightly and impact multimedia use:

Feature Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Max Video Resolution 1080p at 24fps 1080p at 30fps
Video Formats H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic Input Yes No
Headphone Output No No
Stabilization No (lens-based only) No

The X-E1’s microphone input enables better audio capture for vloggers and hybrid shooters, though it lacks headphone monitoring. The NX1100’s lack of external mic input and reliance on standard codec parameters limits serious video use.

Neither camera provides image stabilization in-body, requiring stabilized lenses or rigs for smooth video or handheld shooting.

Which Camera Fits Your Photography Passion?

Based on our extensive testing and evaluation, here’s how each camera aligns with specific photographic interests:

Recommended For: Fujifilm X-E1

  • Enthusiasts looking for distinct color rendering and classic Fuji look
  • Portrait photographers valuing natural skin tones and bokeh
  • Landscape and travel shooters desiring robust build and EVF
  • Users who prefer manual control and tactile dials
  • Hybrid shooters needing a microphone input for video

Recommended For: Samsung NX1100

  • Photographers prioritizing higher resolution files for cropping
  • Casual shooters wanting a lightweight, compact system with Wi-Fi
  • Street and travel enthusiasts seeking minimal weight and size
  • Beginners who prefer a simple layout with face detection
  • Budget-conscious buyers valuing burst speed for action shots

Final Thoughts: The Expert Verdict on 2013’s Mirrorless Entrants

Both the Fujifilm X-E1 and Samsung NX1100 offer compelling entry points into advanced mirrorless photography - yet they cater to slightly different creative mindsets.

  • The X-E1 excels at delivering character-rich images, a satisfying tactile shooting experience, and a lens system with enduring appeal. It is better suited for photographers who actively shape their exposures and colors and want an optical feel reminiscent of classic cameras.

  • The NX1100 shines with resolution, portability, and connectivity, making it an excellent casual or travel companion with slightly better action shooting capacity. However, it lacks the nuanced handling and build quality that more serious users demand.

Remember, hands-on experience is invaluable. If possible, handle both cameras with your preferred lenses and workflows. Consider how each fits your style, favorite subjects, and future growth. Your next camera should be a trusted partner on your photographic journey - one that inspires you every time you press the shutter.

Happy shooting, and don’t hesitate to explore Fujifilm’s rich lens selection or Samsung’s compact system accessories to personalize your setup!

We hope this in-depth comparison helps you confidently choose the right mirrorless camera for your creative aspirations. For further insights, check out our detailed tutorials on maximizing Fuji X-series film simulations or the best lens options for Samsung’s NX mount.

Fujifilm X-E1 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-E1 and Samsung NX1100
 Fujifilm X-E1Samsung NX1100
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm X-E1 Samsung NX1100
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2013-02-28 2013-04-11
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Pro -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS I CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 368.2mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4896 x 3264 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 15
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Fujifilm X Samsung NX
Total lenses 54 32
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 6.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 350g (0.77 lb) 222g (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 129 x 75 x 38mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 852
Other
Battery life 350 shots 320 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID W126 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $600 $600