Clicky

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000

Portability
85
Imaging
67
Features
78
Overall
71
Fujifilm X-E3 front
 
Sony Alpha A3000 front
Portability
69
Imaging
62
Features
54
Overall
58

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-E3
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 337g - 121 x 74 x 43mm
  • Released September 2017
  • Old Model is Fujifilm X-E2S
  • Later Model is Fujifilm X-E4
Sony A3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
  • Introduced August 2013
  • Updated by Sony a3500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000: An Expert Comparison for Your Next Mirrorless Camera

Choosing the right camera is a pivotal step in your photography journey, whether you're a seasoned professional looking to expand your kit or an enthusiast eager to upgrade. Two entry-level mirrorless contenders that often come up are the Fujifilm X-E3 and the Sony Alpha A3000. Both cater to similar user bases but showcase distinct philosophies in design, technology, and overall performance.

Having rigorously tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years across a broad range of genres, this comparison offers you a transparent, in-depth look at how these two models stack up in real-world use and technical merit. Our goal? To help you make a confident choice tailored to your photographic style, budget, and creative ambitions.

Hold It in Your Hands: Size and Ergonomics

Before diving into sensor specs and autofocus tech, how a camera feels when you hold it matters tremendously - especially if you shoot on the move or for long periods.

Feature Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Dimensions (mm) 121 x 74 x 43 128 x 91 x 85
Weight (g) 337 411
Body Style Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Grip Comfort Small but well-contoured Larger grip, more bulky feel

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 size comparison

The Fujifilm X-E3 impresses with its rangefinder-style compactness and light weight, making it ideal for travel and street photography where discretion and portability are paramount. Its smaller form factor means you can slip it into a small bag with ease.

The Sony A3000, on the other hand, takes a more traditional SLR-style approach. It’s bulkier and heavier, reflecting an earlier design era but providing a more substantial grip that might feel reassuring for those transitioning from DSLRs.

Practical takeaway: If portability and quick handling matter - say, for candid street shots or travel - the X-E3 gives you that edge. If you prefer a heftier feel and don’t mind the extra size, the A3000's grip may feel more natural, especially for wildlife or sports where stability helps.

Control Layout and User Interface: Intuitive or Overwhelming?

Your interaction with camera controls shapes the shooting experience. A thoughtful design can accelerate learning and unleash creativity.

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison

You’ll notice that the Fujifilm X-E3 sports a minimalist yet functional layout, featuring:

  • A touchscreen LCD with intuitive tap focus and menu navigation
  • Dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation, echoing classic photographic controls
  • Electronic viewfinder with 2.36M-dot resolution, providing bright and accurate framing

By contrast, the Sony A3000 offers:

  • A fixed non-touch 3-inch TFT LCD with a much lower 230k-dot resolution
  • Fewer physical controls, leaning on on-screen menus and basic dial adjustment
  • A more basic electronic viewfinder with no indicated resolution and smaller magnification (0.47x vs 0.62x on the X-E3)

For photographers accustomed to tactile controls or those seeking quick manual adjustments without menu diving, the X-E3 stands out. Its interface feels modern and responsive, especially with touch capability, which the Sony A3000 lacks.

The Heart of the Machine: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

A camera’s sensor defines the baseline for image quality, dynamic range, noise performance, and color rendition. Here, the Fujifilm and Sony differ not only in resolution but sensor architecture.

Feature Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Sensor Type APS-C X-Trans CMOS III APS-C CMOS
Sensor Dimensions 23.6 x 15.6 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Effective Pixels 24 MP 20 MP
AA Filter No (better sharpness) Yes (reduces moiré, softens)
Max ISO 51200 (boosted) 16000
Native ISO Range 200 – 12800 100 – 16000

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm’s X-Trans III sensor is notable for its unique color filter array that reduces moiré effects without needing an optical low pass (anti-alias) filter. The result is impressively sharp details and richer colors right out of the camera. Thanks to newer sensor tech and processor (EXR Processor III), the X-E3 produces images with finely controlled noise even at high ISO settings up to 12800 native and 51200 boosted.

The Sony A3000’s sensor uses a conventional Bayer filter with an anti-alias filter to minimize false color artifacts but at a slight cost to micro-detail sharpness. Its 20 MP resolution is sufficient for most general photography but shows more noise and color smearing at high ISO compared to the Fujifilm.

Real-world testing confirms the X-E3 delivers better dynamic range and cleaner high-ISO images, beneficial for low-light, indoor portraits, or event photography.

Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Focus Hunting

Fast and reliable autofocus (AF) is critical, especially for action, wildlife, or street photography where moments last milliseconds.

Aspect Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
AF System Hybrid: 325 phase & contrast Contrast-detection only
AF Points 325 25
AF Modes Face detection, AF-C, AF-S AF-C, AF-S
Eye AF & Animal AF Eye detection AF No
Continuous Shooting 14 fps 3 fps

With its 325-point hybrid autofocus system, the X-E3 combines phase and contrast detection to lock focus swiftly and accurately. This is especially valuable for tracking moving subjects - as in wildlife or sports photography. Moreover, the X-E3’s eye detection AF ensures sharper portraits by keeping critical focus on the subject’s eyes, a feature missing on the A3000.

In contrast, the Sony A3000 uses an older contrast-detection autofocus system with only 25 AF points. While respectable for static or slow-moving subjects, it struggles with fast action or tracking, and its burst shooting mode at 3 fps is somewhat limiting.

For photographers focused on people, animals, or dynamic scenes, the X-E3’s AF system offers clear advantages that translate into more successful shots.

What You See Is What You Get: Viewfinder and Rear Screen Experience

Having a bright, sharp viewfinder and a responsive LCD screen is essential for composing confidently in various light conditions.

Feature Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
EVF Resolution 2.36M dots Not specified, lower quality
EVF Coverage 100% 100%
EVF Magnification 0.62x 0.47x
Rear Screen Size 3 in. 3 in.
Rear Screen Resolution 1.04M dots 230k dots
Touchscreen Yes No

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The X-E3 features a high-res fixed 3-inch touchscreen (1040k dots) that supports touch focus and menu navigation, which greatly enhances usability and speed. Its EVF is one of the best in its class - bright, detailed, and with a realistic color balance, replicating an optical viewfinder feel.

The A3000's screen and EVF lag behind. The LCD's low resolution results in a less crisp playback experience, and the small four-sevenths magnification electronic viewfinder gives a less immersive framing environment. Lack of touchscreen limits quick focusing, a potential bottleneck in fast situations.

Build and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Outdoors?

For landscape, wildlife, and travel photographers, durability and some form of weather sealing can make or break the choice.

Feature Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Build Material Magnesium alloy body Polycarbonate/plastic
Weather Sealing No No
Durability Solid construction Less robust
Shockproof, Waterproof No No

Neither camera offers formal weather sealing or ruggedization, though the X-E3’s metal body conveys a more reassuring solidity than the plastic-heavy A3000. For serious outdoor or adventure use, you’d need third-party protection with either.

Lens Ecosystems and Compatibility: Unlocking Creativity

Perhaps one of the most vital considerations is the breadth and quality of lenses available for your system.

Attribute Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Lens Mount Fujifilm X mount Sony E mount
Native Lens Options 54 as of 2017 121 as of 2013
Prime & Zoom Choices Focused on high-quality primes Broader but includes older APS-C, E-mount lenses
Vintage Lens Support Wide via adapters Also extensive with adapters

Sony’s E mount has a much larger lens selection, spanning from budget-friendly third-party options to high-end professional glass. The A3000’s compatibility with this lineup allows for flexibility across genres, from wide landscapes to super-telephoto wildlife setups.

Conversely, the Fujifilm X mount lenses are noted for their optical excellence and beautiful color rendition, especially their fast primes that are beloved for portrait and street photography. Though fewer in number, the quality can outweigh quantity depending on your preference.

Battery Life and Storage: Shoot Longer with Less Worry

Aspect Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Battery Type NP-W126S (Lithium Ion) NP-FW50 (Lithium Ion)
Battery Life (CIPA) ~350 shots per charge ~470 shots per charge
Storage Options Single SD/SDHC/SDXC card Single SD (details unclear)

The Sony A3000 offers roughly 30% longer battery life per charge, which might be valuable for extended shooting without backup batteries. The X-E3’s touchscreen and higher-performance processor naturally consume more power but remain decent for typical everyday shooting scenarios.

Video Capabilities: For Hybrid Shooters and Content Creators

Feature Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000
Max Video Resolution 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 20-25 fps Full HD 1080p
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, H.264, MP4
Audio Inputs External mic port No microphone port
In-body Stabilization No No
Slow Motion or 4K Photo No No

Video shooters will appreciate the X-E3’s ability to record 4K footage, albeit at 20-25 fps, suitable for travel vlogging or social media content. The microphone input allows for superior audio capture, critically lacking on the Sony A3000. For casual video, the A3000’s 1080p output suffices, but it’s limited compared to the Fujifilm.

Performance in Different Photography Disciplines

One of the best ways to gauge a camera’s overall value is by how well it supports your preferred photography genres.

Genre Fujifilm X-E3 Sony A3000 Who Should Prefer
Portrait Excellent eye AF, rich colors Adequate, less sharp Portrait lovers favor X-E3
Landscape Sharp sensor, good DR Decent, older sensor tech Both okay, slight X-E3 edge
Wildlife Fast AF, 14 fps burst Slow AF, 3 fps burst X-E3 for action emphasis
Sports Reliable tracking & speed Limited continuous shooting X-E3 for sports, A3000 for occasional sports
Street Compact, discreet, touch AF Bulkier, slower AF X-E3 preferred
Macro Manual focus aids, no IS Manual focus only, no IS Comparable; consider lens
Night/Astro High ISO capability More noise at high ISO X-E3 advantage
Travel Lightweight, 4K, touchscreen Longer battery, simple UI Depends on portability vs battery
Professional Work RAW, fine image quality RAW support; older tech X-E3 for higher-quality output

Examining sample images confirms the X-E3’s richer skin tones, cleaner high-ISO performance, and superior color rendition, making it more versatile across most photography styles. The Sony A3000 delivers acceptable quality but shows its age in autofocus and video capabilities.

Final Verdict and Recommendations


Considering each factor, the Fujifilm X-E3 emerges as the more modern, capable, and versatile mirrorless camera. Its superior sensor, robust autofocus with face and eye detection, touchscreen interface, and 4K video support make it an excellent choice for:

  • Enthusiasts wanting an upgrade with modern features
  • Portrait and street photographers valuing compactness and speed
  • Travel and event shooters requiring 4K and good low-light performance

On the flip side, the Sony A3000 remains a budget-friendly option with decent image quality and strong battery life. It might suit:

  • Beginners stepping into interchangeable lens systems on a tight budget
  • Users who prioritize simplicity over cutting-edge features
  • Those invested in the extensive Sony E-mount lens ecosystem seeking affordable bodies

Practical Next Steps: How to Choose and Explore

When deciding, test handling in-store if possible. Pay attention to how the camera feels in your hand and how intuitive the controls seem. Consider the lens investment you’re willing to commit to since optics shape your results far more than the body itself.

  • For Fujifilm X-E3, explore prime lenses like the compact 23mm f/2 for street and everyday shooting or the excellent 56mm f/1.2 for portraits.
  • For Sony A3000, evaluate affordable zoom lenses to cover versatile focal lengths, though newer Sony bodies have surpassed the A3000 in autofocus and functionality.

Also, think about your typical shooting scenarios. If video is an important part, the X-E3’s 4K mode and microphone input are compelling advantages.

Wrapping Up: Trusting Your Creative Vision

Both the Fujifilm X-E3 and Sony A3000 carry forward the legacy of democratizing mirrorless photography. The A3000 was a solid entry model in its time; however, the X-E3 embodies a refinement and technological leap that meets contemporary creative demands.

Your camera is the tool to realize your creative vision. The X-E3 provides the precision, image quality, and usability we consistently recommend for photographers who want a mirrorless system ready for diverse challenges - from portraits to landscapes, street photography to light video work.

Check out sample galleries, compare side-by-side handling, and if possible, rent or borrow both for a hands-on feel. Investing in a robust system that supports your photographic vision is worth the extra effort. Happy shooting!

If you found this thorough review helpful, keep exploring related lenses, accessories, and photography tutorials to unleash the full potential of your new mirrorless camera.

Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony A3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-E3 and Sony A3000
 Fujifilm X-E3Sony Alpha A3000
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Sony
Model Fujifilm X-E3 Sony Alpha A3000
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2017-09-07 2013-08-27
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor III BIONZ image
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS III CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 368.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 5456 x 3632
Max native ISO 12800 16000
Max enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 325 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X Sony E
Total lenses 54 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.47x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 14.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync.
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (20p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, H.264, MP4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 337 gr (0.74 pounds) 411 gr (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 74 x 43mm (4.8" x 2.9" x 1.7") 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.8
DXO Low light score not tested 1068
Other
Battery life 350 photos 470 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126S NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $700 $398