Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 4 years prior to the E-520 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores vs the E-520 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus E-520. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-520
E-300 | E-520 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-300
E-520 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2008 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-520
E-300 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 offers external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-300 and the E-520.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61c8/c61c8a40e1496de337c9778440b850766235b54b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-520 is 67 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce15/7ce1572934aa8e27e6611fd171b5ff0f65832d72" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and E-520.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-520 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5432/f543205c1713619fbcbb2463906c705dc3b52483" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f6dc/5f6dcaca902faa65247b8d56156b4719e9e3b35b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-520 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-520 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2008-08-20 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | None | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 552g (1.22 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 548 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $800 | $400 |