Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Released September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-H2 was manufactured 3 years later than the E-M1X and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-H2 grades versus the E-M1X when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | January 2019 | More recent by 45 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Sharper display (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M1X | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display dimension | 3.00" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H2 offers physical dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1X has sizing of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 and the E-M1X.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1X is 62 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1X.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-H2 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-H2 will show greater detail due to its extra 20 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H2 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-09-08 | 2019-01-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 82 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.00" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/180000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 15.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 pounds) | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 pictures | 870 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Battery model | NP-W235 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | - |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Pricing at launch | $1,999 | $2,999 |