Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
80 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 450g - 140 x 82 x 43mm
- Launched June 2012
- New Model is Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro1 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe Fujifilm X-Pro1 was revealed 8 years prior to the X1D II 50C and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-Pro1 matches up vs the X1D II 50C in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-Pro1 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-Pro1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-Pro1
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | June 2012 | Fresher by 84 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1230k | Clearer screen (+1130k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-Pro1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-Pro1 enjoys outer measurements of 140mm x 82mm x 43mm (5.5" x 3.2" x 1.7") along with a weight of 450 grams (0.99 lbs) while the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 compared to the X1D II 50C.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and X1D II 50C is 80 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The visual here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and X1D II 50C.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-Pro1 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you extra detail because of its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-Pro1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model type | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-06-28 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 117 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.60 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/10000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 2.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 450 gr (0.99 lb) | 725 gr (1.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 82 x 43mm (5.5" x 3.2" x 1.7") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Launch cost | $1,169 | $5,750 |