Fujifilm X-S1 vs Panasonic FZ300: The Ultimate Bridge Camera Face-Off for Enthusiasts and Pros

It’s funny how time changes our gear preferences. The Fujifilm X-S1 dropped back in 2011, while the Panasonic FZ300 showed up in 2015, yet both remain relevant contenders in the bridge camera world for shooters craving long zooms and all-in-one versatility without lugging interchangeable glass. Having handled both extensively in real-world shoots and lab-style ISO, dynamic range, and autofocus tests (yes, I’m that nerdy about pixel-level sharpness and AF microadjustments), I’m here to give you the scoop on these two small sensor superzooms.

Let’s break them down - physically, technically, and creatively - so you can decide which is the better fit for your style, budget, and ambitions. I'll also share when you might want to pass, and what features truly impact daily shooting performance.

Size and Handling: Clubs for Your Thumbs or Pocket-Friendly?

Starting with the obvious: these two SLR-esque bridge cameras look deceptively bulky given their sensor size. But that heft has its perks for those who want solid grip and stable handling without a full DSLR rig.

Here’s what struck me first: the Fujifilm X-S1 is visibly larger and heavier at 920g versus the FZ300’s 691g, and its chunkier dimensions give a solid feeling but risk fatigue on all-day outings. The Panasonic is more compact (132x92x117mm versus 135x107x149mm) and lighter - a welcome relief during travel or street shooting where subtlety and portability are priorities.

Both offer SLR-style grips, but the X-S1 has a deeper, more pronounced hold - perfect if you have sizeable mitts. Panasonic’s grip is ergonomic but less pronounced, helping keep the footprint smaller without sacrificing much comfort. Controls on both are logically placed, yet the Fujifilm's larger size accommodates slightly bigger buttons, which I found easier to manipulate with gloves on.

So, if your hands like a club, or you’re shooting long sessions on landscape trips, the X-S1 feels like a rugged workhorse. But if you want a nimble travel buddy that won’t call attention in city streets, lean toward the FZ300.

Design and Control Layout: Intuitive or Button Overload?

Taking a peek from the top down reveals intriguing design philosophies.

The X-S1 keeps to analog dials for shutter speed and aperture - lovers of classic control will appreciate this, as immediate tactile feedback is king during manual exposures. The mode dial and zoom rocker are chunky, easy to find by touch, which is a huge plus in fast-changing light or action scenes.

The Panasonic FZ300 opts for a more modern approach: button-heavy, with a touchscreen-enabled 3" LCD that’s fully articulating (more on screens in a bit). Its control layout is tighter, and while all essential settings are accessible, the smaller buttons take getting used to. The FZ300 does pack a dedicated 4K Photo mode button - tempting for those wanting burst-like frame grabs - though that’s a niche use case.

In daily shooting, I found the Fuji’s analog clubs easier to dial in quickly, especially in dim light or for those manual exposure veterans. That said, the FZ300's touchscreen lets you tap-to-focus and swipe menus faster once accustomed.

Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger Isn’t Always Better - But Often It Helps

Both cameras sport small sensors, but the Fujifilm X-S1 boasts a 2/3" EXR CMOS sensor measuring 8.8mm x 6.6mm, nearly double the area of Panasonic’s 1/2.3" 6.17mm x 4.55mm CMOS chip.

This size difference (58.1 mm² vs 28.1 mm²) plays a crucial role in image quality, especially in noise handling and dynamic range. Fuji’s 12MP resolution is identical to Panasonic’s, so pixel pitch is larger on the X-S1, which theoretically should yield less noise and better tonal gradation.

At base ISO 100, both cameras deliver detailed images, but push beyond ISO 800 and the Fuji maintains cleaner shadows and smoother gradation thanks to larger pixel wells. The X-S1’s DxOmark color depth of 20.4 bits and dynamic range of 11.2 EVs confirm its sensor’s strong rendering capabilities, compared to Panasonic’s untested standing, though user tests show more aggressive noise reduction on the FZ300.

In field conditions - say cloudy landscapes or dim indoor portraits - the Fuji renders skin tones with richer warmth and smoother transitions. The Panasonic’s images skew a tad cooler and have marginally harsher midtone noise.

At the telephoto end of their zooms (24x+), the Fuji’s image stabilization paired with its sensor size produces sharper results, which brings me to the next point.

Autofocus and Stabilization: Raptors in the Bush or Tortoises at the Track?

Both cameras feature contrast-detection AF with 49 focus points, face detection, and continuous AF modes - pretty standard, but practical.

The Fujifilm moves briskly for a 2011 model, locking onto still subjects reliably and tracking moderately fast-moving ones fairly well. However, its continuous AF in burst mode can occasionally hesitate in low-contrast scenes, requiring manual intervention.

Panasonic’s FZ300 has fresher guts and benefits from a more responsive AF system with touch AF and custom focus area selection; its continuous AF tracking is nippier, especially useful for erratic wildlife or street subjects. The camera's burst rate pushes up to 12 fps (versus X-S1's 10 fps), which could be a deciding factor for some sports/action shooters.

Both have formidable optical image stabilization systems that shine especially at long focal lengths, significantly reducing shake. With a bulky lens range like these models have, I strongly recommend turning on stabilization for any hand-held work to maintain crispness. The Fuji’s stabilizer helps balance the heavier lens better, but the Panasonic’s balance and stabilization help you hang onto shots during quick pans.

Screen and Viewfinder Quality: See What You Shoot in Style

The rear screens offer two different approaches to usability.

The X-S1 boasts a 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with a modest resolution of 460k dots, which feels quaint compared to the FZ300’s gloriously sharp 3-inch fully articulating touchscreen at 1040k dots. The difference in brightness and clarity is very evident - important when composing in bright sunlight.

Fuji’s rear screen is decent but clearly dated; fine for framing, less so for checking sharpness critically on location. The FZ300's touchscreen brings much-needed versatility, especially for macro shots or awkward-angle street photography. It’s rare in bridge cameras of this era to find full articulation and touch integration, and Panasonic’s offering feels like a modern boon.

Both models sport electronic viewfinders with 100% coverage, but Panasonic wins easily with a 1440k-dot EVF versus the X-S1’s unspecified low-res EVF. Eye-level composition, especially in bright sun, is more reliable on the FZ300, but the Fuji’s EVF still offers a competent framing experience.

Versatility in Photography Genres: Where Does Each Camera Shine?

To better visualize practical strengths, I dug into how these cameras stack up across major photographic disciplines.

Fujifilm X S1 front Fujifilm X S1 screen back Panasonic FZ300 front Panasonic FZ300 screen back

Portraits

Fujifilm X-S1: The warm color science and smooth skin rendition made portraits pop convincingly. Coupled with its fast f/2.8 aperture at wide end and subtle bokeh (though limited by sensor size), it’s a solid choice for casual portraits. Eye detection works reliably enough for sharp critical focus on faces.

Panasonic FZ300: The consistent f/2.8 aperture throughout the zoom range helps deliver creamy backgrounds even at longer focal lengths - not bad for candid portraits on the go. The touch AF improves handshake on framing eyes quickly.

Landscapes

Fujifilm X-S1: Higher dynamic range and larger sensor trump Panasonic here. The X-S1's 12MP files show nuanced detail in shadows and highlights - great for HDR or handheld wide-angle landscapes.

Panasonic FZ300: Still capable, especially in good light, but it’s more prone to highlight clipping and noisier shadow areas when pushing exposure post-processing. Weather sealing gives it an edge in harsher outdoor conditions, enabling worry-free shooting in rain or dust.

Wildlife

Fujifilm X-S1: The massive 26x zoom (24-624mm equivalent) packs serious reach, but autofocus lags on erratic subjects, and burst rate is respectable but not class-leading.

Panasonic FZ300: Shorter zoom at 24x (25-600mm) is close, but faster AF and higher burst speed make this better for lively animals or birds in flight. Plus, weather sealing helps with rugged field use.

Sports

FZ300’s touch AF and 12fps burst mean it takes the minor nod here for capturing fast action. X-S1’s performance is decent but can falter on autofocus tracking in complex scenes.

Street

Panasonic’s smaller size, quieter operation, and articulating touchscreen make it slightly more discreet and versatile for street photography. The X-S1 feels bulky and less nimble, but its slow sync flash options can be creatively exploited.

Macro

Both offer a 1cm macro focus range, but the FZ300’s articulating display and touch AF provide a practical advantage in close-up work, letting you shoot from awkward angles effectively.

Night/Astro

The X-S1’s sensor excels in low light, pushing usable ISOs higher with less noise. Noisy shadows on the FZ300 limit astro dreams somewhat, despite good shutter speed range.

Video

The FZ300 clearly dominates: 4K recording at 30p/24p and 1080p at up to 60fps versus X-S1’s capped 1080p at 30fps. Panasonic also mounts stereo mic input, and its advanced in-body stabilization benefits handheld video shots. The Fuji’s video is serviceable for casual clips but lacks modern video features that videographers seek.

Travel

Battery life favors the FZ300, rated at approximately 380 shots (based on CIPA standards) versus the X-S1’s unknown but generally lower endurance. The Panasonic’s smaller, lighter build and weatherproofing make it the better travel mate. The Fuji’s bulk and lack of environmental sealing may deter some explorers.

Professional Work

Neither are full-on “prosumer” tools, but the Fuji’s RAW files have slightly more editing latitude, and its rugged form suggests more reliability over time. Panasonic’s modern feature set and wireless connectivity also appeal to content creators needing easy sharing. Both cameras support SD cards with similar capacity and speed.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Rough and Ready?

Panasonic announced the FZ300 with an environmental sealing that covers dust, moisture, and splash resistance. The body feels tough, evidenced by its rubberized grips and tight body plates.

By contrast, Fuji’s X-S1 lacks official weather sealing, which makes it less reliable for adventure or inclement weather shoots. Its build is solid, but you’ll want to be cautious with exposure to harsh elements.

So if you’re outdoorsy and want fewer worries about the weather, the FZ300 takes the clear crown here.

Lens and Zoom: Power Versus Speed

Both feature fixed lenses with substantial zoom ranges that dwarf standard DSLRs with kit lenses.

The X-S1 wins in reach with an almost extra 20mm at the long end - potentially invaluable for wildlife or distant subjects. The downside is the slower aperture progressively at telephoto (f/5.6), which challenges low-light shooting.

Panasonic’s constant f/2.8 allows better control over depth of field throughout, enabling better selectivity and exposure in varying light. Yet the slightly shorter max zoom may matter for some tele-enthusiasts.

Battery and Storage: Keep Shooting, Keep Going

Battery life is a make-or-break feature in bridge cameras designed for all-day outings.

Panasonic’s FZ300 boasts a respectable 380 shots per charge using the battery pack. Fujifilm’s X-S1 battery life is unspecified (likely fewer shots given older tech), and its NP-95 battery can be somewhat costly to replace.

Both cameras use a single SD card slot supporting SDHC and SDXC cards, offering plenty of storage flexibility.

Connectivity and Extras: Sharing Without Wires?

Connectivity-wise, the Panasonic FZ300 shines with built-in Wi-Fi for quick photo sharing and remote control via smartphone apps - a big win in our social media-savvy era.

The Fuji X-S1, however, has no wireless features - a limitation for content creators who want rapid uploads.

Both feature USB 2.0 ports and HDMI outputs for tethered shooting or video playbacks.

Price and Value: Budget Talk

At launch prices, the Fuji X-S1 was more affordable (~$399) compared to Panasonic’s FZ300 ($598). Today, both are aging models with varying street prices, often discounted or available used.

For a cheapskate who values reach and decent IQ in daylight landscapes or wildlife, the Fujifilm still holds merit.

If you want more modern photo and video features, weather sealing, and touchscreen control, the Panasonic justifies its premium, especially for hybrid shooters who video blog or shoot event videos.

Summary Table: Quick Pros and Cons

Who Should Buy Which? Tailored Recommendations

Choose the Fujifilm X-S1 if:

• Your heart beats for longest possible zoom reach in a bridge camera.
• You appreciate traditional dials and tactile manual exposure control.
• You shoot mostly in good light and want better image quality at base ISO.
• You prefer a chunkier body with solid grip for landscape or wildlife.
• Your video needs are minimal or casual.

Choose the Panasonic FZ300 if:

• You want a well-rounded modern superzoom with excellent video credentials.
• Weather sealing and ruggedness are priorities.
• Touchscreen and articulating display enhance your shooting flexibility.
• You favor faster autofocus for action, birding, or street work.
• Connectivity and easy social media sharing matter.
• You value a lighter, smaller camera for travel.

Final Verdict: The Bridge of Your Dreams or a Solid Workhorse?

After clocking many hours with both, I’m inclined to lean toward the Panasonic FZ300 as the more versatile, future-proof option, especially for hybrid shooters who blend stills and video, or who venture outside in less-than-ideal conditions. Its more modern design and features provide a more satisfying day-to-day shooting experience.

That said, the Fujifilm X-S1 holds its ground as an excellent choice if your focus is still photography with reach and image quality taking precedence over bells and whistles. There’s a throwback charm in its analog controls and heft, which some will find invigorating.

On a final note - if you’re a budget-conscious enthusiast seeking maximum zoom for casual use with decent fidelity, the X-S1 still punches above its weight. If you can stretch your budget a bit, the FZ300 is an investment in improved handling, speed, and multimedia delivery.

Wrapping Up with Scores and Genre Suitability

Let’s lock these insights into a quick visual summary of their overall and genre-specific performance based on hands-on testing and technical benchmarks.

Those charts confirm what our deep dive affirms: Fuji’s edge in image quality and telephoto reach contrasts with Panasonic’s superior autofocus, video, and ruggedness.

If you’re still chewing on which camera fits your photography life, drop me a line with your favorite shooting style and budget, and I’ll help you narrow down choices tighter. Because at the end of the day, the “best” camera is the one that makes you want to shoot more, more often.

Safe shooting, and happy clicking!

Article Images used:

• size-comparison.jpg
• top-view-compare.jpg
• sensor-size-compare.jpg
• back-screen.jpg
• cameras-galley.jpg
• camera-scores.jpg
• photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg