Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19744/19744d663e3063a9429b6242440944eaa666659e" alt="Fujifilm X-S10 front Fujifilm X-S10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Introduced October 2020
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-M10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-S10 was manufactured 6 years later than the E-M10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X-S10 scores versus the E-M10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus OM-D E-M10. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-M10
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2020 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 81 months |
Display type | Fully articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-M10 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M10
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S10 has got external dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") having a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 has specifications of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-M10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 compared to the E-M10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8be39/8be3947d5dfcbcbf0f154a494cadb2266213565b" alt="Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10 is 73 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76b7d/76b7d21101466f4445492bad870182d92f7239d6" alt="Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will render more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S10 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72981/72981aa78f995a1abe605afecd73f74f00877673" alt="Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fa13/2fa13bde6dc948909eecada0657d416eb5234b22" alt="Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-10-15 | 2014-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 465g (1.03 lbs) | 396g (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 320 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $999 | $600 |