Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Announced October 2020
- Successor is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-S10 was manufactured 3 years later than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X-S10 scores against the E-M10 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-S10 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | August 2017 | More recent by 39 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-M10 III | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S10 comes with exterior dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") and a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 against the E-M10 III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10 III is 73 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10 III.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will render extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-S10 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-10-15 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 465g (1.03 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $999 | $650 |