Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
![Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III/Olympus-E-M5-III-front.jpg)
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M5 III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M5 III (20MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T200 was introduced 4 months after the E-M5 III so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the E-M5 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1740k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-M5 III | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2020 | ![]() | October 2019 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has specifications of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M5 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-M5 III.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M5 III is 80 and 80 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M5 III.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-III-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2019-10-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,780 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 310 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $699 | $1,199 |