Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76


80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M5 III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M5 III (20MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was introduced 4 months after the E-M5 III so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the E-M5 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1740k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-M5 III | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2020 | ![]() | October 2019 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has specifications of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M5 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-M5 III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M5 III is 80 and 80 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M5 III.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2019-10-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,780 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 310 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $699 | $1,199 |