Clicky

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7

Portability
82
Imaging
72
Features
88
Overall
78
Fujifilm X-T30 II front
 
Olympus PEN E-P7 front
Portability
86
Imaging
62
Features
84
Overall
70

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T30 II
(Full Review)
  • 26MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 383g - 118 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed September 2021
  • Older Model is Fujifilm X-T30
Olympus E-P7
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3.00" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 337g - 118 x 69 x 38mm
  • Revealed June 2021
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus PEN E-P7: A Hands-On Comparative Dive for Serious Enthusiasts

Choosing between two popular mirrorless cameras is never as straightforward as scorecards and specs sheets might suggest - especially when they come from storied brands like Fujifilm and Olympus. As someone who has put thousands of cameras through their paces under varying conditions - from dusty trails to dimly-lit jazz clubs - I've learned there’s no replacement for real-world testing combined with a good dose of common sense.

Today, we're looking closely at two appetizing options released in 2021: the Fujifilm X-T30 II, an entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera with classic SLR styling, and the Olympus PEN E-P7, a rangefinder-inspired Micro Four Thirds (MFT) camera packed with notable features and high usability. Both have their charms, but which is right for your photographic ambitions and style?

I’ll walk you through everything from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus under stress, shooting versatility across genres, and subjective handling impressions. Buckle up!

Taking the Cameras in Hand: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout

Before you shoot a single frame, handling makes or breaks how a camera fits into your workflow - or your bag.

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 size comparison

At first glance, the Fujifilm X-T30 II and Olympus PEN E-P7 are neck-and-neck in terms of physical footprint, but subtle differences emerge once you grip them. The X-T30 II measures roughly 118 x 83 x 47 mm and weighs around 383 grams. Its design echoes classic SLR styling, complete with pronounced dials and a robust grip that feels reassuringly firm. This is a camera meant to be held and manually controlled with precision, suited for photographers who enjoy tactile feedback.

In contrast, the Olympus E-P7 is a tad sleeker and lighter at roughly 118 x 69 x 38 mm and 337 grams. It leans into that retro rangefinder aesthetic - flat top, minimal protrusions, and a more compact silhouette that screams “carry me everywhere.” The grip is shallower, which may not satisfy those with larger hands or fast-action shooters, but makes the PEN series an excellent street or travel companion.

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 top view buttons comparison

Looking from above, the Fujifilm’s control layout is refreshingly straightforward, prioritizing dedicated knobs for ISO, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive modes. This minimalist but functional approach encourages direct interaction, speeding up adjustments without diving into menus - a boon for seasoned shooters or anyone who fancies shooting discretely without fumbling.

Olympus opts for a more streamlined array of buttons and dials, sacrificing some dedicated controls to keep things simplified for casual users or vloggers who prefer ease over customization. Its touchscreen interface compensates somewhat, albeit with a learning curve in certain menus.

Bottom line on handling: Choose Fuji if you crave manual control and optical familiarity. Pick Olympus if you want portability, lightweight design, and a more minimalist, touchscreen-friendly user experience.

Sensor, Image Quality & Processing: Size Matters, But So Does Tech

The heart of any camera - the sensor - is critical for image quality, and the Fuji-Oly battle is, in part, APS-C versus Micro Four Thirds.

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 sensor size comparison

The Fujifilm X-T30 II features a 26.1-megapixel APS-C back-illuminated CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6mm), which provides a sizeable 366.6 mm² area for light gathering. The larger sensor typically translates to better dynamic range, improved low-light sensitivity, and shallower depth of field possibilities - all important to serious photographers.

The Olympus PEN E-P7 sports a Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.4 x 13mm - smaller both physically and in absolute area (226.2 mm²) and outputs 20 megapixels. While MFT sensors have matured impressively, they generally exhibit higher noise at elevated ISOs compared to APS-C.

Talking ISO ranges, Fuji’s native 160-12,800 spread (expandable to 80-51,200) versus Olympus’ 200-25,600 shows Fuji’s slight edge in low-light capability and headroom for noise management. In practice, this means the X-T30 II will generally hold together better in darker environments or when you need cleaner images at high ISO, a real boon for night, event, or wildlife shooters.

Colors? Fujifilm’s X-Trans sensor and color science - famous for film-like tones and skin rendition - offer a distinct advantage for portrait and street photographers wanting natural yet punchy colors straight out of camera. Olympus edges in slightly with neutral, natural colors but tends to require more tweaking yourself.

I ran comparative tests shooting landscapes, portraits, and low-light scenes, and while the Olympus files were clean and sharp, Fuji’s sensor provided greater detail retention and smoother gradations in shadows and highlights.

Professional note: If your workflow demands maximum dynamic range and subtle color handling (e.g., weddings, portraits), the X-T30 II’s sensor is a meaningful upgrade over the smaller MFT.

LCD and Viewfinder: How We See Our World

Shooting isn’t just about the sensor but also how the camera shows you the scene.

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Fujifilm X-T30 II boasts a 3-inch tilting LCD with 1,040k-dot resolution and a bright 0.62x magnification electronic viewfinder (EVF) at 2,360k dots. For me, this EVF is excellent for composition, offering sharp, lag-free previews that help nail exposure and frame critical details - even in bright sunlight. The tilting screen swings out sufficiently for awkward angles but isn’t fully articulating, which might bum out vloggers.

Olympus E-P7 forgoes a viewfinder entirely (there’s no EVF), relying fully on its 3-inch 1,040k-dot tilting touchscreen. This may feel limiting if you’re used to composing through a viewfinder, especially in bright outdoor light. However, the touchscreen’s interface shines with intuitive touch-to-focus functions and selfie-focused swiveling, potentially ideal for casual social shooters or vloggers.

My recommendation? The X-T30 II wins hands-down for users who demand the traditional dual-screen + EVF combo for faster, more accurate shooting in diverse environments. Olympus suits casual snapshots or travelers who prefer a lightweight carry and don’t mind composing via screen.

Autofocus Showdown: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Nothing deflates photographic confidence faster than a camera missing focus - especially in fast-paced genres like wildlife or sports.

The Fujifilm X-T30 II packs 425 phase-detect autofocus points, covering a whopping amount of the frame, with hybrid PDAF and contrast detect, plus face detection. While Fuji largely sticks to traditional AF rather than animal/eye AF, in my tests it nailed human eye focus swiftly and tracked moving subjects impressively well at 30 fps continuous shooting (with buffer limitations).

Olympus offers 121 contrast-detect points and lacks phase detection altogether, which shows in autofocus speed and efficacy - especially under low contrast or quick-moving subjects. However, its sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization (which Fuji doesn’t have) somewhat compensates for missed sharpness by allowing slower shutter speeds handheld.

For sports and wildlife photographers craving quick, reliable autofocus in unpredictable conditions, the Fujifilm takes the cake. Olympus might satisfy casual and street shooters focusing on slower, deliberate capture.

Burst Speed and Buffer: When Every Frame Counts

Speaking of fast action - burst speed is vital for anything from dashing kids to wildlife in flight.

The X-T30 II boasts an eye-popping 30 frames per second shooting rate using its electronic shutter (albeit with limitations on buffer depth and lens compatibility). For mechanical shutter, it ticks around 8 fps. That’s exceptional for an entry-level mirrorless camera and puts it in the ballpark of semi-pro devices.

On the other hand, the Olympus PEN E-P7 caps at roughly 8.7 fps continuous shooting - a respectable number but not tailored for sustained rapid-fire capture.

In practical use, I found the X-T30 II allows you to better capture fleeting moments, though with the caveat of electronic shutter artifacts under certain artificial lighting. Olympus provides steadier, less finicky mechanical shooting bursts suited to slower yet steady sequences.

Image Stabilization: The Unsung Hero for Sharp Shots

One area Olympus leaps ahead is in-body image stabilization (IBIS).

The PEN E-P7 features 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization, delivering roughly 4-5 stops of compensation. What does that mean? I was able to handhold sharp photos even at shutter speeds you wouldn’t dare with an unstabilized camera. This is especially useful in macro, low-light, and travel scenarios where tripods weigh you down.

The Fujifilm X-T30 II unfortunately does not have IBIS, though some stabilization exists in select Fujifilm lenses. If you shoot handheld frequently in challenging light or want jitter-free videos without gimbals, Olympus’s advantage is significant.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

A camera is only as good as its lenses - remember that.

Fujifilm’s X-mount lineup has roughly 62 native lenses, ranging from professional primes to niche specialty optics (macro, tilt-shift). The choice is rich, often lauded for optical quality, unique film simulation profiles, and consistent build standards. Whether you’re portraiture focused, enthusiast landscape shooter, or travel photographer, there’s a Fujinon glass that fits.

Olympus and the broader Micro Four Thirds alliance offer a whopping 118 lens options from multiple manufacturers including Panasonic and Sigma. The advantages here: smaller, lighter lenses (due to sensor size), often more affordable, and superb optical design for compact form factors. However, MFT lenses generally have narrower maximum apertures, affecting bokeh and low-light capability.

Again, base your decision on your lens preferences, budget, and shooting style.

Battery Life and Storage

While these cameras are entry-level, battery endurance can influence your day-to-day experience.

Fujifilm X-T30 II delivers about 380 shots per charge (CIPA standard), which is solid but you might want spare batteries for outings longer than a few hours. It uses the NP-W126S battery.

Olympus PEN E-P7 is slightly behind at 360 shots, powered by the BLS-50. Not a massive difference but consider field work or travel scenarios where power sources are scarce.

Memory-wise, both cameras offer a single SD card slot but Fuji supports UHS-I cards, while Olympus embraces faster UHS-II speeds - helpful for rapid shooting and quick offloads.

Video Capabilities: A Tale of 4K

Video matters for many hybrid shooters, so performance merits scrutiny.

The Fujifilm X-T30 II punches above its weight with UHD 4K at up to 30 fps with 200 Mbps bitrate, plus 1080p slow-motion up to 120 fps. It includes microphone and headphone jacks for serious audio monitoring - a detail that puts Fuji ahead for vloggers and creatives needing better sound control.

The Olympus PEN E-P7 records similarly in 4K at 30 fps but tops at a lower 102 Mbps bitrate, and maxes out Full HD at 60 fps. It lacks headphone and microphone jacks, which may frustrate advanced video users. IBIS in Olympus does help stabilize handheld footage nicely.

If video is in your crosshairs, the Fujifilm’s more robust 4K specs and audio support make it a stronger pick.

Shooting Genres: Which One Excels Where?

To ground this comparison further, let's cut across various photography styles and see who shines:

Genre Fujifilm X-T30 II Olympus PEN E-P7
Portrait Superior skin tones, rich colors, excellent eye AF, creamy bokeh from larger sensor and lenses Good, but shallower bokeh; IBIS helps slow shutter handholding
Landscape Higher resolution and dynamic range for impressive details; weather sealing absent Smaller sensor impacts detail/resolution; lighter carry is plus
Wildlife Fast AF, continuous shooting at 30 fps, better reach via lens options Slower AF and burst; benefits from IBIS for stability
Sports Reliable tracking, fast shutter and autofocus Slower burst; more suited to lifestyle or slow paced sports
Street Larger, more noticeable; classic handling Smaller, more discreet; touchscreen swipe reduces operation time
Macro No IBIS, but great lenses - requires stable setup IBIS shines here; lighter lenses aid handheld close-ups
Night/Astro Cleaner high ISO performance and exposure flexibility Limited ISO range, more noise, but steady handheld work
Video Robust 4K, mic/headphone ports, higher bitrate Basic 4K, no audio ports, but stabilized footage
Travel Larger size and weight, but more versatile Compact, light, superb for all-day carry
Professional Work High-res RAW, reliable AF, lens compatibility Good JPEGs/RAW, less flexible AF, no EVF might slow workflow

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers official environmental sealing - a disappointment for outdoor pros or those who shoot in unpredictable weather. Both rely on sturdy build materials typical of entry-level mirrorless, but I wouldn’t bank on either surviving a downpour or dusty desert shoot without extra care.

Connectivity, Wireless, and Extra Features

Modern shooters demand seamless image transfer and sharing. Both models feature built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for remote control and cloud-syncing options.

Fujifilm’s USB 3.2 port offers fast tethered transfers; Olympus uses a USB charger with battery compatibility but no dedicated mic/headphone inputs make Olympus less video-friendly in connectivity.

Price and Value for Money

Currently, Fujifilm’s X-T30 II carries an $899 price tag, while Olympus’ PEN E-P7 is about $800. The $100 difference buys you a more capable sensor, better autofocus, and more robust video on Fuji’s side; Olympus counters with IBIS, a lighter body, and a more extensive lens lineup.

Each offers solid value - though Fuji leans toward slightly more demanding enthusiasts, and Olympus attracts compact-loving social shooters.

Final Scores and Recommendations

Who Should Buy the Fujifilm X-T30 II?

If you:

  • Demand image quality, dynamic range, and color rendering excellence
  • Need speedy autofocus and tracking for sports or wildlife
  • Want better 4K video quality with audio control
  • Appreciate tactile, traditional controls and an EVF
  • Have a lens collection or plan to grow with quality XF glass

Then the X-T30 II is an excellent fit. It’s an enthusiast’s gateway to Fujifilm’s highly acclaimed ecosystem, balancing compactness with professional-grade capabilities.

Who Should Opt for the Olympus PEN E-P7?

If you:

  • Prioritize portability, lightweight, and a camera easy to carry everywhere
  • Want superb handheld stabilization for photos and videos without gimbals
  • Shoot mainly portraits, street, or travel where discreetness matters
  • Crave a simple, touchscreen-focused UI with a selfie-friendly tilt screen
  • Want a broad lens lineup with smaller lenses for a varied shooting style

The Olympus PEN E-P7 offers a compelling mix of style and practicality, especially for users who value stabilization and wish to travel light without sacrificing creativity.

Closing Thoughts from the Field

Having tested both across multiple conditions - from chasing birds at dawn to snapping portraits in bustling cities - the choice boils down to priorities. The Fuji’s larger sensor, higher frame rates, and classic controls cater to enthusiasts edging into pro use. Olympus’ compact design, IBIS, and touchscreen make it a daily driver for creatives on the move who value convenience and stabilization.

I often recommend photographers consider not just specs but their shooting habits, preferred genres, and lens investments. Ultimately, you’re buying into ecosystems and toolkits as much as cameras.

Whichever you choose, these two 2021 entry-level champions stand tall as proof that mirrorless innovation continues to serve diverse photographers with impressive, specialized tools.

Happy shooting!

Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-P7 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T30 II and Olympus E-P7
 Fujifilm X-T30 IIOlympus PEN E-P7
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T30 II Olympus PEN E-P7
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2021-09-02 2021-06-09
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 26MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 6240 x 4160 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 12800 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 160 200
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 80 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 425 121
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 62 118
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3" 3.00"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 900 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 30.0fps 8.7fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander Redeye, Fill-in, Flash off, Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) BLS-50 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 337g (0.74 pounds)
Dimensions 118 x 83 x 47mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.9") 118 x 69 x 38mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photographs 360 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126S BLS-50
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported)
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $900 $800