Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was launched 2 years after the WG-1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PM2 grades versus the WG-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax WG-1
| E-PM2 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2013 | February 2011 | Newer by 28 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-PM2
| WG-1 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax WG-1
| E-PM2 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PM2 vs the WG-1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and WG-1 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and WG-1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger E-PM2 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2011-02-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $448 | $350 |