Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
![Fujifilm XF1 front Fujifilm XF1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XF1/Fujifilm-XF1-front.jpg)
![Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX4/Ricoh-CX4-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and CX4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm XF1 was brought out 2 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores versus the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm XF1 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm XF1
CX4 | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm XF1 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XF1 has physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the CX4.
![Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF1-vs-Ricoh-CX4-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF1-vs-Ricoh-CX4-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and CX4.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XF1 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm XF1 will resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XF1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-XF1-vs-Ricoh-CX4-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF1-vs-Ricoh-CX4-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Fujifilm XF1 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm XF1 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 199 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $380 | $211 |