Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Superseded the Fujifilm XQ1
Panasonic FP1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1, both Ultracompact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the FP1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and FP1 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XQ2 was released 5 years after the FP1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up vs the FP1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery and Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Panasonic FP1
| Fujifilm XQ2 | FP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 62 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| FP1 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Panasonic FP1
| Fujifilm XQ2 | FP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ2 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Panasonic FP1 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 versus the FP1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ2 and FP1 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ2 and FP1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ2 includes the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The newer Fujifilm XQ2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm XQ2
Portrait photography with Panasonic FP1
you can focus manually
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Street photography information
Panasonic FP1 Street photography information
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (2/3")
more heavy than others in class (206g)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (151g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Sports photography features
Panasonic FP1 Sports photography features
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery power (240 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FP1 Travel photography factors
better than average battery power (240 shots)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (206 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (151g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FP1 Landscape photography information
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (240 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FP1 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than others in class (206 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (151 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 151g (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $153 |