Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6000
- Successor is Sony A6500

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6300, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and A6300 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 3 years after the A6300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the A6300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony A6300
X1D II 50C | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2016 | More modern by 42 months |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+1438k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
A6300 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6300
X1D II 50C | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C against the A6300.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and A6300 is 60 and 83 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and A6300.
As you can see, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in more detail due to its extra 27 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Total lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 404 grams (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $5,750 | $889 |