Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Hasselblad X2D and Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Leica. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X2D was introduced 10 years later than the M Typ 240 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the X2D matches up against the M Typ 240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Leica M Typ 240. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Leica M Typ 240
X2D | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | September 2012 | More recent by 122 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Hasselblad X2D
M Typ 240 | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Leica M Typ 240
X2D | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D comes with outer dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Leica M Typ 240 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X2D and Leica M Typ 240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the X2D versus the M Typ 240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and M Typ 240 is 56 and 74 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and M Typ 240.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X2D having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will give you extra detail using its extra 76MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer X2D is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Leica M Typ 240 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5952 x 3976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Total lenses | 13 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 1% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lb) | 680 gr (1.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 500 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $8,199 | $5,479 |