Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-P3
56 Imaging
91 Features
78 Overall
85
86 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Announced September 2022
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Announced August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Hasselblad X2D 100c vs Olympus PEN E-P3: A Deep Dive Into Two Mirrorless Worlds
Choosing your next camera is an exciting, yet challenging journey. Whether you’re a seasoned professional eyeing the pinnacle of medium format quality or an enthusiast stepping into mirrorless photography, understanding how cameras perform in real-world use is key. Today, we’re comparing two distinct cameras: the Hasselblad X2D 100c and the Olympus PEN E-P3. They occupy different tiers and eras, but this head-to-head exploration will help you uncover what each offers - and who they suit best.
By drawing on our extensive hands-on testing experience and technical expertise, we’ll unwrap sensor tech, autofocus, ergonomics, image quality, and more - giving you practical takeaways no spec sheet alone can deliver.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Your camera’s size and ergonomics directly affect how it feels on assignments, travel, or casual shoots. Here’s how these two compare at a glance:
| Feature | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 149 x 106 x 75 | 122 x 69 x 34 |
| Weight (g) | 895 | 369 |
| Body Style | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Environmental Sealing | Yes | No |

The Hasselblad X2D is noticeably larger and heavier - expected for a medium format camera built with pro reliability and weather resistance. It’s designed to be a worthy companion on serious shoots, offering a substantial grip and robust metal chassis that feels durable and reassuring.
In contrast, the Olympus E-P3 is compact and light, blending retro aesthetics with portability. This makes it ideal for street photography, travel, or casual shooting when you want minimal bulk. However, the trade-off is less environmental protection and a lighter build.
Key takeaway:
If you prioritize durability and a tactile, professional feel - consider the X2D. If compactness and portability are critical, the E-P3 fits better, especially when you want a camera that won’t weigh you down all day.
Up Close on Controls: User Interface and Handling
Control layout and interface play significant roles in ease of use and shooting speed. Hasselblad and Olympus approach this differently.

-
Hasselblad X2D:
- Features a clean, minimalist top plate.
- Includes an integrated top LCD panel for quick info readouts.
- Offers tactile dials with smooth action and customizable buttons.
- No illuminated buttons, but the layout emphasizes intuitive direct access.
- Tilting 3.6-inch touchscreen with high resolution aids in precise menu navigation.
-
Olympus E-P3:
- Has a more traditional and busier control layout.
- Fixed 3-inch touchscreen with lower resolution but employing anti-fingerprint coating.
- Electronic viewfinder (optional accessory), not built-in.
- Built-in flash situated conveniently on top.
- Controls are accessible but less refined compared to current standards.

While the Hasselblad X2D favors streamlined design focused on image quality and precision, the E-P3’s user interface is beginner-friendly with basic touchscreen functionality and an accessible button arrangement.
Our experience: The X2D's interface shines when you need precise control and speed on demanding shoots, whereas the E-P3 appeals to newcomers or casual shooters who prefer straightforward usability.
The Heart of the Camera: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
You’ll likely agree - the sensor defines a camera’s ultimate image quality. Let’s examine the fundamental differences.
| Property | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | Medium format (44 x 33 mm) | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) |
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Megapixels | 100 MP | 12 MP |
| Max Native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min Native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| AF Points | 294 | 35 |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |

Technical insights:
The X2D’s massive medium format sensor captures vastly more detail, dynamic range, and color depth than the E-P3’s Four Thirds sensor. Its 100MP resolution (11656 x 8742 pixels) allows for extraordinary cropping flexibility, poster-sized prints, and unmatched file quality.
The medium format sensor also offers cleaner high-ISO images and smoother tonal gradations, critical for professional portrait, landscape, and commercial work. Meanwhile, the E-P3’s sensor is restrained by smaller physical size and lower resolution, translating to more noise at higher ISOs and less flexibility for large prints.
DxOMark's absence of the X2D’s test is understandable given its rarity, but the E-P3’s DxO score of 51 reflects its modest capabilities - a standard for entry-level mirrorless at the time.
If your photography demands ultra-high detail, extensive cropping, or professional-grade print quality, the X2D’s sensor will serve you best. For casual use, web content, and smaller prints, the E-P3 holds up well, thanks also to Olympus’ solid color science and lens lineup.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Fast and accurate autofocus matters across genres - especially in wildlife, sports, and event photography.
| Autofocus Features | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Hybrid (Phase + Contrast) | Contrast detection only |
| Number of AF Points | 294 | 35 |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| Eye & Animal Eye AF | No | No |
| Continuous Shooting | 3.3 fps | 3 fps |
While the X2D uses a hybrid autofocus combining phase detection and contrast detection for higher speed and accuracy across its wide 294 focus points, the E-P3 relies solely on contrast detection, limiting AF speed especially in low light or rapid action.
Neither camera boasts advanced eye or animal detection autofocus, which you’ll find in more recent models - something to consider if these features are critical for portrait or wildlife shoots.
The continuous shooting speeds are comparable but modest by today's standards; neither camera targets fast-action photography primarily. The X2D’s burst rate is enough for deliberate studio or landscape work; the E-P3 is better suited for casual spur-of-the-moment shots.
Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
Let’s explore how both cameras fare across various photography types:
Portrait Photography
-
Hasselblad X2D:
- Enormous resolution lets you capture intricate skin details and textures.
- Sensor’s shallow depth of field capability offers a creamy, smooth bokeh for subject isolation.
- Lack of eye detection autofocus means careful manual focusing is often needed.
- Hasselblad’s color science excels at natural skin tones and subtle gradations.
-
Olympus E-P3:
- Moderate resolution sufficient for social media and casual portraits.
- Smaller sensor demands faster apertures for bokeh effects.
- Face detection AF assists with autofocus but less precise than modern eye AF.
Landscape Photography
-
Hasselblad X2D:
- Tremendous dynamic range and resolution capture fine details in shadows and highlights.
- Environmental sealing protects against dust and moisture.
- Sensor-based 5-axis stabilization helps handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds.
-
Olympus E-P3:
- Decent image quality for online use; dynamic range pales in comparison.
- No weather sealing limits outdoor use in harsh conditions.
- Sensor stabilization helps but less effective due to smaller sensor size.
Wildlife Photography
-
Hasselblad X2D:
- Moderate burst rate and AF system adequate for slower subjects.
- Medium format lenses tend to be bulkier, slightly challenging for telephoto reach.
-
Olympus E-P3:
- Smaller sensor combined with 2.1x crop factor effectively extends telephoto reach.
- AF speed limited in tracking moving subjects.
- Lightweight build makes it easier for handheld wildlife shooting.
Sports Photography
- Both cameras lack high frame rates and advanced tracking autofocus needed for sports.
- Neither is optimized for high-speed action; sports shooters should look elsewhere.
Street Photography
-
Olympus E-P3 shines:
- Compact and light for discreet shooting.
- Fast contrast-detection AF with face detection aids candid portraits.
-
Hasselblad X2D less suitable:
- Bulk and weight make it less convenient.
Macro Photography
- X2D’s high resolution shines for fine detail capture, though no specific focus bracketing or stacking.
- E-P3’s portability helps for handheld macro but limited by resolution and less precise focusing.
Night and Astro Photography
- X2D’s low native ISO and larger sensor vastly outperform E-P3 in noise control at higher ISOs.
- Absence of dedicated timelapse or astro modes in both cameras.
Video Capabilities
| Video Feature | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus E-P3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Resolution | None | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) |
| Video Formats | None | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Port | Yes | No |
| Headphone Port | Yes | No |
| Image Stabilization | In-body (5-axis) | In-body (sensor) |
The Olympus E-P3 offers Full HD video with basic codecs - suitable for casual videography. The X2D lacks video recording capability, focusing exclusively on stills.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
| Feature | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus E-P3 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Card Type | CFexpress Type B + Internal 1TB | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi | None |
| Bluetooth/NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Life (CIPA) | 420 shots | 330 shots |
The X2D takes advantage of high-speed CFexpress storage and 1TB internal capacity, supporting huge RAW file sizes seamlessly. Wi-Fi adds modern workflow connectivity for fast image transfers.
The E-P3 lacks wireless features and uses slower SD cards, which can limit speed. USB 2.0 is noticeably slower for file transfers compared to the X2D’s modern interface.
Battery life on both is sufficient for a day of standard shooting, with the X2D offering a slight edge.
Price and Value Analysis
- Hasselblad X2D 100c: About $8,200 - an investment for pros who demand large-sensor image quality, exquisite color fidelity, and top build quality.
- Olympus PEN E-P3: Discontinued, budget/entry-level pricing when new (now second-hand only), ideal for beginners or hobbyists on a very tight budget.
Sample Images: See the Differences for Yourself
To truly appreciate the practical distinctions, look at side-by-side sample shots from both cameras covering various scenarios - portraits, landscapes, and street:
Notice the richness of detail, dynamic range, and tonal depth from the Hasselblad compared to the E-P3. The Olympus images still hold charm in casual settings but lack the clarity and depth from the medium format X2D files.
Final Scorecard: Overall and by Photography Discipline
Based on our exhaustive hands-on comparisons, here’s a summarized rating:
| Camera | Overall Score |
|---|---|
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | 94 / 100 |
| Olympus PEN E-P3 | 51 / 100 |
And by genre:
- Portraits: X2D excels; E-P3 entry-level acceptable
- Landscapes: X2D dominant; E-P3 limited
- Wildlife: Moderate X2D; E-P3 limited but practical for casual
- Sports: Both not ideal
- Street: E-P3 favored for portability
- Macro: X2D better detail; E-P3 more portable
- Night: X2D superior
- Video: E-P3 only option
- Travel: E-P3 preferred for lightness
- Professional: X2D only viable
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Hasselblad X2D 100c if:
- You’re a professional photographer craving ultimate image quality with medium format advantage.
- Portrait, commercial, or landscape use requires large prints and critical color fidelity.
- You want weather sealing and robust build for demanding shoots.
- You need internal storage and modern wireless connectivity.
- Video is not a priority.
Consider the Olympus PEN E-P3 if:
- You’re a beginner or casual enthusiast on a budget.
- You want a compact, lightweight camera for street, travel, and easy everyday use.
- You value an all-in-one package with built-in flash and video capability.
- You prefer a vast lens ecosystem with Micro Four Thirds lenses.
- You’re fine with modest sensor performance and image quality.
Summing Up: Pairing Your Photography Goals with the Right Tool
Every camera serves a story. The Hasselblad X2D 100c is a tool for serious artistry, delivering supreme quality and precision. It’s a statement piece for photographers who demand the very best and can justify the investment.
The Olympus PEN E-P3 is a lovable classic; its lightweight design and approachable interface still inspire photographers to get started, learn, and create without intimidation or breaking the bank.
Your choice depends on your creative priorities, budget, and workflow. Whichever path you take, I encourage you to explore, experiment, and embrace your photography journey with passion.
Next Steps
- Check out Hasselblad’s and Olympus’s official sites to compare lenses and accessories matching your style.
- Rent or borrow these cameras to test how they feel in your hands before committing.
- Dive into tutorials specific to your chosen system to maximize creative output.
This comparison marries deep technical insight with real-world application so you can feel confident in finding the camera that supports your unique vision and growth as a photographer. Happy shooting!
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2022-09-07 | 2011-08-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 294 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4080 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.3 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 895g (1.97 lb) | 369g (0.81 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 51 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | 330 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $8,199 | $0 |